When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hey, just curious as to what's a better tranny. Ford C-6 or Dodge 727. It's not going to affect a decision or anything, but I have a 727 out back and I'm looking for a C-6 so it's a coincidence. I'm still stickin with ford though, the 727 is Dad's :-)
Both trannies are near indistructable for an auto. I'm not sure but I think the 727 may be a bit more effecient but its very easy to mob the C6 during a rebuild to be as effecient as any auto ever built.
I once heard that both were designed by the same person, who also designed the TH-400 for GM. They are both very strong trannies, but have disadvantages such as no overdrive, no lockup TC, and high 1st and reverse gears.
They are equally strong transmissions, both are bulletproof. So is the Th400. What I'm suprised at is the strengh of a 904, which is equal to a C4 or TH 350, for those who don't know. I swap powertrains from car to car for my demolition cars, and have a 904 that has been through 4 or 5 derbies, and still works fine.
I've had both. The 727 in a 69 Charger, highly modded 440, 14/1 compression, cam, headers, 10" slicks, going thru the clocks in the high 9's. For the most part, the tranny stayed with the huge horsepower and torque of the 440. Second gear was a problem occasionally. I have a 74 F-100 in the garage with a modded 391 making a little over 500 hp with a C-6 behind it with a shift kit. It holds the old FE block quite well. Either tranny is the best of each manufacturer. But in my experience, the 727 will hold up a little better to abuse. Why is it I get the feeling this is the old Ford/ Dodge arguement?
yep they're both stout.
i asked the guy where i had my C-6 built if it would handle the 460 i built for my truck. he just kind of chuckled and said it will handle just about anything you throw at it as long as you keep it cool. and it has so far.
i was able to kill a727 in my 70 super bee doing stupid kid stuff. had to drive home about five miles in reverse. good thing it was 2:00 am
I worked in my dad's transmission shop from the time I was 12 years old and ran it myself for a few years after he got to old to handle it. I have done work on a lot of both of these transmissions and saddly for me being a ford guy I have worked on a lot more C6 trannys than 727s. They are both very solid as is the GM THM400 but the C6 and its little brother the C4 had chonic problems with the valves sticking in the valve body and govenor if they ever got any debri in them, causing problems with fluid pressure, poor or no shifting and sometimes no down shifting which would often lead to burned up clutches. The fact that they had a wire mesh filter was no help in keeping trash out of the valve body. The 727 used a felt filter which would sometimes clog if the fluid got really dirty but it kept the valvedbody clean and you could replace it and keep truckin with no problems.
Only problem I ever had with a TF 727, is when I didn't hook up the kickdown linkage. I didn't know that it needed to be there, to control line pressure. I had all Hemi 727 internals, and it still fried.
the 727 was a great tranny, but the later C-6's are just as tough or tougher. I rebuilt aC-6 with 165,000 miles on it behind a 460 with 250 H.P. nos system on it. It was the easier to rebuild than the C-4 or C-5.
Last edited by IB Tim; Jan 27, 2005 at 11:20 AM.
Reason: SP
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.