Notices
Modular V10 (6.8l)  

2005 V-10 Mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 11:30 AM
  #31  
paulm's Avatar
paulm
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Cottondale, Texas
One thing I noticed when I bought my '03, I reset the mileage calculator and it registered 6-6.5 mpg for the first tank. After about 1,000 miles the mileage had come up into the 11s and it continued upward as the miles increased finally hitting 14.5 in combined driving at 95,000 miles. (I reset the calculator every time I refill) At 95,000 I took the truck in and had the plugs changed, throttle body and injectors cleaned and they found some cracked boots so those were changed out along with the fuel filter. My mileage immediately dropped into the 12s and now at 98,300 miles it's creeping back up toward 13.5. Not sure what they did, but whatever it was it affected the economy.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #32  
Texascadillac42's Avatar
Texascadillac42
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 563
Likes: 3
What rear end ratio are you guys runnin with these trucks? I just ordered an 05 V10 F250, SC, 4x4 SWB, 6spd, with 410s, and Im hoping my mileage is a little bit higher than whats being reported here. The truck should be lighter than most. Around town isnt really an issue, but on the highway it would be nice to get a few more miles out of a tank. I may end up swapping out the stock rubber for some bigger tires, to effectively get a higher (lower numerically) rear end ratio. Just lookin on specs such as cab and bed config, and rear end gear for what you guys are running. Thanks for the help.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 01:23 PM
  #33  
morcutt's Avatar
morcutt
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Hill, GA
I just drove from GA to NJ in my new truck (350 King Ranch, dually, 4.3 LS). I put two hundred miles of break-in mile on the engine with 'around town' stuff and then hit the road (200 miles was all I had time for). It was an 800 mile trip (so I've got 1000 mils on the truck now) and I average 11.2 MPG (highway).
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 01:29 PM
  #34  
SMiller's Avatar
SMiller
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: Kokomo
Hah, my 5.4 get's 11.3 on the highway, lol, it does kinda suck a little doesn't it...


Texas Cadilac you are going to be right there with us, those bigger tires will cost you a good mile per gallon, sorry buddy! The manual does put a little more power to the ground, hope for 15mpg on the highway, hope....
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 01:40 PM
  #35  
Texascadillac42's Avatar
Texascadillac42
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 563
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by SMiller
Hah, my 5.4 get's 11.3 on the highway, lol, it does kinda suck a little doesn't it...


Texas Cadilac you are going to be right there with us, those bigger tires will cost you a good mile per gallon, sorry buddy! The manual does put a little more power to the ground, hope for 15mpg on the highway, hope....
On the last pickup that I had, F150 4.6V8, I upgraded the standard tires to 265s and squeaked another 1mpg or so out of it. I understand the concept of needing more power to take off with, but with that much torque on tap, it shouldnt be of any concern. Past experience has shown me that a small increase in tire size to get lower RPMs on the highway will get better fuel mileage. Just like 3.73s (on the highway) will get better MPGs then 4.30s, or in my case 4.10s
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 04:42 PM
  #36  
SMiller's Avatar
SMiller
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 848
Likes: 3
From: Kokomo
I think it's the rolling resistance that gets you, I went from 265's to 295's and I could feel it suck some power and milage out of my truck. That truck will have some power!
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #37  
Texascadillac42's Avatar
Texascadillac42
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 563
Likes: 3
I agree 100%, It is definitely the rolling resistance that affects it. The 265s I had were the same width as the stockers. I ran 285s for a while, but they were very wide, and did indeed cut down on MPG. A taller, same width tire should help the MPG, within reason.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2005 | 05:47 PM
  #38  
psd4mike's Avatar
psd4mike
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Texascadillac, I got a 2005, 4.10 rear gears, F250 CC, SRW, LWB, V10/auto. Getting 10, almost 11 mpg.

mike
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #39  
labwillow's Avatar
labwillow
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Mackville,VT
Almost time for the next fillup on my 9300LB '05 4x4 6spd DRW Platform dump w/4.30 LS and it looks like I may get a whooping 8mpg this time. I can hope anyway!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 04:37 PM
  #40  
cwilli's Avatar
cwilli
Freshman User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
I did 8.5mpg on the last tank! Almost all city driving. What's strange to me is the way Ford has calibrated the gas guage. I think I have a 30g tank (250 SB CC) and yet I only have to put in 22g when the needle is on the Empty line. The 'refuel needed' indicater comes on ever earlier.

I guess when you get 8-10mpg, a 10g reserve is a good thing.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 08:04 PM
  #41  
DJR 17's Avatar
DJR 17
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 476
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
CWILLI, it's a well documented problem with the gas tank on the short bed trucks and not the gauge. The filler neck extends too far down into the tank. If you have the patience you can squeeze in an extra 5-6 gallons in the tank after it first shuts off.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 08:06 PM
  #42  
wbarber_07458's Avatar
wbarber_07458
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 164
Likes: 1
From: Upper Saddle River, NJ
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by cwilli
I guess when you get 8-10mpg, a 10g reserve is a good thing.
I guess so, but it sure can be annoying - especially with the 29 gallon tank on the short boxes.

I record every one of my fillups, and I have yet to put more than 24.5 gals into the tank, despite some of those being hard on empty with the warning light flashing for many miles.

Just the opposite of some of the small Japanese cars I have had, where empty means "time for a scenic walk".

Bill
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 08:09 PM
  #43  
wbarber_07458's Avatar
wbarber_07458
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 164
Likes: 1
From: Upper Saddle River, NJ
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by DJR 17
CWILLI, it's a well documented problem with the gas tank on the short bed trucks and not the gauge. The filler neck extends too far down into the tank. If you have the patience you can squeeze in an extra 5-6 gallons in the tank after it first shuts off.
I thought the foaming thing was a diesel problem - didn't know it occurred on gas trucks as well.

Bill
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 10:49 AM
  #44  
labwillow's Avatar
labwillow
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Mackville,VT
Just an update. 1535 miles driven to date and 6.89 average mpg. I think that I am going to try the battery disconnect option and see if it helps.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 02:46 PM
  #45  
nisiar's Avatar
nisiar
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 8
Ford lists the gas tank on the SB as 30.5.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE