Notices
Garage & Workshop Tips & Ideas for the garage or workshop. No Truck Tech Discussion   

Torque spec considerations?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2004 | 10:02 AM
  #1  
Ultraute's Avatar
Ultraute
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 290
Likes: 1
From: South TX
Question Torque spec considerations?

A lot of the fastners on our vehicles require fairly accurate torqueing (tightness) to perform properly and safely. Since a lot of the work I do here at home is seldom with all new fittings, I'm wondering if one should compensate for older or rusty threads? (more torque) OR lubricate and use less torque?

Case in point, I had my 8 lug aluminum wheels off yesterday, and the lug nuts and studs seemed kinda dry, and difficult to remove. Had to use a wrench most of the way off.(yes,by hand,waitig till X-mas for that new impact wrench) Now it wasn't very hard, but I couldn't spin them off with my fingers. SO- upon reinstallation I lubed them up with a shot of WD40 and a dab of grease. When I went to torque them down to spec (100fp) it seemed maybe too tight (the lube worked really well).
Also, not to long ago I had to remove a manifold stud nut that was rusty. It came off OK, and went back on OK, but it took a wrench and some effort to put it on. (again with WD40)

SO, my questions are this- Should torque be adjusted acording to conditions like these? (more for hard parts, less for lubed ones)
Are factory specs calculated for new unlubricated parts?

I believe that with all the aluminum and light weight materials going into todays vehicles, that proper torqueing is more inportant than ever.

Seems to me that well lubricated threads will turn much easier, and therefor require less force to get them to a given tightness (clamping force). Just like a fine thread bolt will clamp tighter than a standard bolt will at the same torque. After all, it's the clamping force we're trying to accomplish, using torque to get there.

Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Rob
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2004 | 11:54 AM
  #2  
78Explorer's Avatar
78Explorer
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 0
From: South...
Rob,

You bring up some interesting points...ones that I've never thought too much about until now.

My guess would be that since you're cleaning and lubing the fastener before reinstalling, that the specified torque would be accurate, providing the torque wrench is accurate. I'd say the specified torque applies to a clean, properly lubricated (or just clean) fastener. I use a dab of anti-seize on all wheel lugs and any other fastener that might be in danger of becoming hard to remove over time, before torquing.

I'm sure there are some engineers and folks with way more experience than mine who will be glad to add their opinions to this thread. I haven't experienced any failures with my torquing methods yet...so unless someone can show me the error of my ways, I guess I'll continue as I have.

Regards,
Scott
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2004 | 02:38 PM
  #3  
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,157
Likes: 1
From: Central Kali
I recall reading something about oiled versus non oiled bolts on engine headbolts regarding torque. I oil or use anti-sieze on everything I put back together. I hate rusty threads.
 
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 12:09 AM
  #4  
Sberry27's Avatar
Sberry27
Tuned
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 483
Likes: 1
Yup, torque specs are for clean lightly lubricated threads. John Deere tech has a school manual for mechanics that is specialized dealing with fastners. Its worth reading. Bolts can dry seize and friction weld together, permanantly fastened. A lot of times you think a lug nut is rusted on, many times it dry seized during installation. This happens a lot at tire stores, they zip the nuts on at hi speed, the heat and pressure welds them right on. Run them up slow with the gun. We oil every bolt we install here. I like Aero-Kroil better than WD-40, its a little oiler and comes out of the can a drop at a time if you want, but anything works. I dont use never sieze on wheels as its just too messy and slow, just a little shot of spray. On a National Coarse bolt about 40% of the torque is used up in thread friction, a dry bolt would go higher and will reduce the applied tension that the fastner is designed to provide. Use oil unless there is specific instructions not to.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 09:48 AM
  #5  
rebocardo's Avatar
rebocardo
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,873
Likes: 3
From: Atlanta GA
> Are factory specs calculated for new unlubricated parts?

Yes, though some are for lubed parts with 30 weight oil. It depends on the part. I usually use anti-seize and go for the lower value, except for internal engine parts, then I go strictly by the book.

On non-critical parts, bolts for MAP sensors as an example, I use anti-seize and then go hand tight because no way am I going to get an accurate reading on a bolt so small with anti-seize nor am I going to waste my time using a torque wrench for it.

On some parts that come with anti-seize on them (02 sensors) where you are not suppose to put anything on the threads or connectors, with pipe threads, I do good-n-tite because getting a torque wrench in there is impossible and they give the torque specs just to make the OEM engineers feel good.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
camodown
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
133
Sep 2, 2025 12:31 PM
banjopicker66
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
24
Apr 8, 2013 11:49 AM
46yblock
Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368)
8
Jul 19, 2007 11:28 AM
Gwilkrrs
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
36
Mar 28, 2005 09:49 AM
Greywolf
General NON-Automotive Conversation
9
Sep 21, 2001 08:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE