Notices

Deck Clearance Clarification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2004 | 12:06 PM
  #1  
Ryan356's Avatar
Ryan356
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Deck Clearance Clarification

I have been doing a lot of research on my engine rebuild....over a year now and im almost ready to get the parts. I am going to be taking my 88 351 block and putting a 393 stroker kit in it with gt40p heads on it for now that are parted and polished. The thing I have always been fuzzy on was what deck clearance actually was and what changed it. I originally thought that it depended on the block and year but someone at work told me that most blocks were the same and that the piston/crank setup is what determines the deck clearance. So am I right in thinking that two 351s with different deck clearances has the difference because the pistons themselves are different thicknesses? Im just not sure how this works. I was hoping someone could clarify. I do understand that deck clearance is the space at TDC between the top of the piston and the actual top of the cylinder. So maybe this is a dumb question. How is it effected....by the crank, rods, piston thickness, or all...and are all blocks generally the same? I was thinking the later was the case because piston companies can advertise the expected CR based on the block. Thanks for any help and I hope you can understand this.
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 07:40 PM
  #2  
ga302p's Avatar
ga302p
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
What determines deck clearance. Actual deck height of block, and rod length are the variable you will see change it most often. If a stroker crank was built to increase compression drastically, it would slightly change it. Piston affects deck clearance. Some pistons have the wrist pins moved down to increase compression ratio, some have the moved up to lower it.

The gt40-p head is extremely over rated. No way i would use it on a stroker unless it was "radically" ported. Not just a little port work, a lot.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 07:58 AM
  #3  
Ryan356's Avatar
Ryan356
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
So I was right in thinking that all those factors make a difference in the deck clearance... So if im building up my '88 351w do I need to find the deck height for that specific year or were they all the same on that block? Something tells me they are all gonna be the same and that the rotating assembly changes are what made the deck clearance numbers differ. The reason why I ask is because I want to run on pump gas and the stroker kit/w dished pistons says that I will be at 9.5 to 1 CR with a combustion chamber volume of 60cc's and it never mentions anything about deck clearance changing anything. The gt40's are right around there, so I think I might be ok. Also, the gt40p's are only temporary until I get some afrs or twisted wedge heads. Thanks for the help.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 09:12 AM
  #4  
Mike G's Avatar
Mike G
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,447
Likes: 1
From: Littleton, CO
The deck clearance "should" be the same on all motors, but then again each one is separately cast. Your assumptions are just that with the advertised information. The only truth will be to measure your individual deck height.... You can also change your formula by using different head gaskets. Most steel shim type are .020 and the heavier soft ones are .040. Do it and have fun, you can always adjust for too much compression with minimal changes.

--Mike
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 11:16 AM
  #5  
Ryan356's Avatar
Ryan356
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Thanks for the help guys. After some searching of the internet about this I found out that the deck height is the same for my block way back to 1971 when there was a small change. So my conclusion is that deck height changes from year to year are because of rotating assembly changes not the block like I was wondering. This is why companies can advertise the compression ratios expected from that block. I still dont know how to find the actual deck clearance on my motor. Im thinking I have to take the total deck height and subtract the height of the piston and the rod at centerline of crank... In any case it doesnt really matter I was just curious and it would be nice to understand things more in depth as I attempt my first buildup.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 11:51 AM
  #6  
Mike G's Avatar
Mike G
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,447
Likes: 1
From: Littleton, CO
Just so long as the valves don't hit the pistons, it'll run

You will need to mock up the engine and measure for exact deck clearance, other than that it's just formulas and no definites. Of course milling will also need to be taken into account if your deck has been resurfaced.

Enjoy --Mike
 

Last edited by Mike G; Jul 1, 2004 at 11:54 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 06:29 PM
  #7  
ga302p's Avatar
ga302p
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
IF you are considering updating to a twisted wedge head, be sure you use a piston that is made for them. I have never built an engine for the twisted wedge heads. Mainly because they are not as good as some of the other performance heads on the flow bench, and the are pricey. The valve reliefs have to be twisted in the piston also. In your stroker, the dish may be able to handle the valves without any reliefs, just something you would have to check.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 10:38 PM
  #8  
FEmtnmax's Avatar
FEmtnmax
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Montana
KB silvolite has a dynamic and static compression ratio calculator that will be a BIG help in determining what piston deck height you need to run on the octane fuel you want to choose. Other factors that are included are cylinder head combustion chamber cc, intake valve closing event, rod length, piston deck clearance, piston top dome or dish cc, head gasket thickness, etc.
For my FE410, I ended up with my pistons sticking out above the block deck by 0.003 to have a piston to cylinder head quench of 0.038 inch. My engines dynamic compression ratio is 7.9:1 and static compression ratio is 9.4:1. The engine runs on 85 octane and is smooth and a strong runner. Even for a 2.5 ton (empty) F250 4x4 the acceleration will really set you back in the seat. It took alot of extra time to machine everything to get the numbers to work out but it was worth it in the end. Using the calculator was a real help.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 04:57 PM
  #9  
ga302p's Avatar
ga302p
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
85 octane, you must live at pretty high altitude. You wouldn't get most stocke engines to run on 85 octane at sea level.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BigBlocker0248
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Jan 17, 2016 03:20 PM
RatRodAlex
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
5
Aug 21, 2015 08:04 PM
monkei
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
15
Apr 17, 2010 09:38 AM
monkei
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
9
Jan 20, 2009 08:01 PM
funfor
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
May 16, 2007 01:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE