When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Is there any evidence to the effect that bug deflectors increase air drag thereby decreasing fuel milage? I am considering removing all unnecessary items that might reduce milage, bug deflector, luggage racks, etc.
J in VA '94 Ex
I haven't seen any specifics, but from a couple of different 'motoring' shows I have watched on TV, they say it does increase drag, sometimes by quite a bit.
Originally Posted by jwirth
Is there any evidence to the effect that bug deflectors increase air drag thereby decreasing fuel milage? I am considering removing all unnecessary items that might reduce milage, bug deflector, luggage racks, etc.
J in VA '94 Ex
I'm not an expert in aerodynamics by any means, but I have a feeling that at normal highway speeds bug deflectors and luggage racks are not going to influence mileage all that much. My original equipment 98 Explorer luggage rack seems pretty streamlined anyway. I also have a bug deflector on my Explorer. I find that the utility of both far out weigh any gas mileage concerns. My luggage rack has come in handy many times on trips to the hardware store to pick up lumber, pipe, etc. I installed the bug deflector after getting tired of summer driving peering out at the highway through a smear of assorted bugs. Not to mention keeping them from chipping and staining the front of the hood. The bug deflector works well and has reduced these problems a lot. Me, I'm going to keep my racks and bug deflector and not worry about the drag.
JD
Last edited by 9explorer8; Apr 1, 2004 at 06:46 AM.
JD,
You make very valid points. Yet I have never used my luggage racks and figure if I really need them, I can get them back on in a couple of minutes. I think I will wait and see what an intake kit from Ifab does for economy. I need a new air filter anyway!
The bug deflectors do cause some strage things to happen. At 40 MPH on my 87 Ranger the aftermarket bug deflector caused the water from my windshield washer to go toward the front of the truck, not on the windshield. I could live with that, but the way it caused my aftermarket, western style mirrors to vibrate at high speeds is why I removed the deflector.
I have a 99 explorer 4.0 SOHC with a bug deflector. I am getting 12-13 mph with mixed driving. I'm not sure this is normal and would like any input from similar situations. Wouls like to know if I should be getting more or not.
I have been running about 38-40 in my tires. Probably a little high. Last check, I got about 18 MPG mixed driving.
Then I would say you are getting about the average in mileage. I wouldn't worry about the bug deflector as what it's saving you in stone chips/aggravation is worth more than any increased gas mileage you MIGHT get.
True! If I could just keep those darn little bumpers in place that protect the paint.
LOL, I had the same problem. They never stayed stuck to the hood. I solved it by taking off the cheap adhesive that was on the back of them and used a small amount of auto "Goop". I also stuck them to the back of the bug shield instead of the hood. Worked like a charm!
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.