Notices

All Guru's Question!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 10:07 AM
  #1  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
Thread Starter
|
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

Lightbulb All Guru's Question!!

OK..I have a 390... In a 70 F250/C6/Dana/Hedders and a 750 holley on a stock manifold...

Should I just drive the truck as is with the 390 in it...and try to find a 69 or 70 428 to make a little more HP?

Or just rebuild another 390?? I would like to make
Some where around 400HP ...so I guess that being said..

The truck wont be realy pulling much..A small boat on occation..
BUT!! I do live in a hilly area in SW..VA...

And Rat!! that dude down the block with the DOG Hemi...
Is realy OFF!!! LOL!!!

Thanks Guys!!! Russ!!
 

Last edited by Ratsmoker; Feb 18, 2004 at 11:33 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 10:31 AM
  #2  
Scouder's Avatar
Scouder
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
From: Evanston, WY
Club FTE Silver Member

If you are only trying to make 400HP the 390 is quite capable of that. The difference is going to be torque. The 428 is going to make more of it, and do it at lower RPM where it really helps, like cruising over hills on the highway.

If money is not the issue then it is a no brainer, build the 428. If it is an issue then build a nice 400HP 390 and enjoy it. As I have stated before, I think the 390 is a very underrated engine. As soon as people start talking performance they go the 428 route or bigger, when a 390 can be made to perform VERY well for less money.

-Scouder
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 11:10 AM
  #3  
Putt's Avatar
Putt
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 1
From: Colville, Washington
My previous engine was a .040 over 390 with forged pistons, Cam Dynamics 284 Energizer, cheap headers, Ford 4 bbl intake, home ported heads, MSD 6A and Pertronix ignition, 650 Holley dbl pumper, stock 2.03/1.56 valve sizes--hmmm don't remember anything else special. I towed a 16' gooseneck horse trailer(loaded~ 10,000 lbs.) over the highest pass in the state(Sherman Pass) and delighted in passing newer trucks. It ran very hard and never failed to impress others with it's willingness to tow and haul loads. It is important to properly gear the truck to keep the engine in its power band.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 11:30 AM
  #4  
Mike G's Avatar
Mike G
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,447
Likes: 1
From: Littleton, CO
What kind of $$ do you want to spend? A turn key 428 will cost you more than rebuilding a hot 390. If you go bare 428, then you will again need to spend $ to build/rebuild it...

--Mike G
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 11:56 AM
  #5  
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 4
From: Iowa
Here's the going hot setup for a 400+ hp 390ci:

1. Ported stock heads or Edelbrock FE heads
2. Crane 343941 cam
3. Edelbrock Performer RPM intake
4. ~9.7:1 compression
5. 750cfm Holley
6. Headers and dual exhaust, use short open glasspack type mufflers, like race bullets

This is what I'm building for my truck FWIW.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #6  
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
I really wish I had more budget builds on my dyno page. I can give you a cheaper recipie for a pretty hot 390 without breaking the bank. I don't know if I am making over 400HP. Desktop dyno says I am making 450 but who really knows. I don't think I am close to that. I will know in a couple months hopefully.

TRW L2291F Pistons
Stock rods with ARP bolts
ARP main bolts
Crane 343941 cam
Edelbrock Performer RPM intake
750 carb
Headers

The heads are going to be the limiting factor. You can have the bowls hogged, install CJ valves and polish the exhaust port. This will help a lot.

You can run a bigger cam but you will need to upgrade the rocker shafts and stands or buy end stands.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 11:58 AM
  #7  
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
Wow Rusty. We posted almost the same thing at the same time! Crazy.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 12:03 PM
  #8  
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 4
From: Iowa
Beat ya to it though!
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 02:58 PM
  #9  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 421
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally posted by Ratsmoker
Wow Rusty. We posted almost the same thing at the same time! Crazy.
I gotta ask you one thing - your web site says you have flat-top pistons, like I do, but I have C8AE heads, and the pistons I used should have been 10.5:1, not 10 like you're saying.

My machinist went over it one night (couldn't keep himself from touching it before I got there the next morning), and computed something like 10.9:1 with head mill and block decked to 0.

With the whacko cam I have, he degreed it so that I could run that high compression and still have low-end, and I gotta say he got it perfect for a 5400lbs highboy. Any pinging was spark-timing related and I was able to control it with 93 octane gas.

Anyway, where do you get the 10:1 figure? Did you really measure it or what?

I used the flat-top TRW forged pistons with valve-reliefs.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #10  
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
The TRW flat tops have a -9.2cc deduction for the valve reliefs. 67 cc heads will only make about 10:1 compression.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 03:36 PM
  #11  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
Thread Starter
|
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

LOL!!! OK Guys!!! Good info!!! And RAT!! you should collabirate with some of the other Guru's and come up with a HP Budget Build????? IMO...

I think I still have the 406 heads? And the 390 heads... 390 +.030 block...750 holley Dual feed..elec.choke....

And this one I cant believe 32 year old full lenght heddmans
into 2 1/2 " pipes... with crossover tube...

But I think its only 8.7 or 9.0 to pistons? I really dont know?

which pair of heads should be massaged? 406 I think? LOL

With what I gave to start with.. with the project Motor to get
400HP out of it between 375HP and 400HP...

What else should I buy and a list please... My memory at 50 aint what it use to be!!

PS..I have about $2000 to spend? maybe a little more?

Thanks all for your opions and input!!! Russ!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 04:51 PM
  #12  
fordman428's Avatar
fordman428
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 1
From: Iowa
im building a 375hp 390 right now if you want a parts list of my build i can surely post it for ya.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 05:17 PM
  #13  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 421
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally posted by Ratsmoker
The TRW flat tops have a -9.2cc deduction for the valve reliefs. 67 cc heads will only make about 10:1 compression.
Let's see if my math works out:

67cc head (C8AE?), 10cc head gasket (felpro) and 9.7 cc valve reliefs make 86.7cc

390 standard bore: 799cc per cylinder
390 @ .030" over: 811cc per cylinder.

Total volume at BDC:

390: 885.7cc/86.7cc = 10.2:1
390@+.030: 897.7cc/86.7cc = 10.35:1

So, without shaving the heads, I'm at 10.35, and they were shaved a bit - they were first cleaned up and squared, and then something like .030-.040" was taken off, so figuring standard bore and .030" off, that was 6.33cc, but more like 5 because the head chamber is not round...

gives: 10.987:1 - it may be less than that, given the head shaving may not have taken off 5cc, but my machinist physically measured, and it was "just under 11:1".

Block was decked to the top of the pistons.

Comments?
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 05:23 PM
  #14  
averagef250's Avatar
averagef250
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 794
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Hey there,
My truck weighs around 6800 lbs, just pulled a snow covered 72 highboy and trailer weighing just under 17,000 lbs over the snoqualmie pass. 4' of snow on top a truck makes it wiegh a bit more (8000 lb warn winch on trailer with ****** block barely pulled the snow covered truck on). That puts combined weight around 24,000+ lbs! I'm running 435 4 speed, 4.10 gears and 35" bfg's. I put it to the floorboard for a good 15 miles with no pinging whatsoever on 87 octane and holding rock solid at 2200 RPM and 55 mph. I could pull it right up to 70 in 3rd gear if I wanted, but felt better just lugging the motor. I also averaged 11.2 mpg in the 240 miles I trailered the truck. All in all, I'm very happy with my pretty much stock 390. Just d2 heads, performer intake, 901 cam, 9.5 hyper pistons, balanced and blueprinted, DUI, edel. 600. Oh yeah, I found 2 complete fe motors and 4 speeds in the bed of the truck I was towing once the snow melted off.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 09:01 PM
  #15  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
Thread Starter
|
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

Fordman!! I'd like to see your break down on your 375 HP build!!

I'll take and do some more research in the meantime??

Thanks!!!Russ

It sounds like Im going to have to change pistons tho?

Oh well !! thanks Guys!!!!!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE