Conspiracy theories
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Originally posted by AlexDeLarge
But there were no aircraft debris found nearby, were there any?
I mean, couldn't this Pentagon "air crash" be made up just for dramatical purposes?
The truth is out there... too bad we're sitting on the wrong side of the line
But there were no aircraft debris found nearby, were there any?
I mean, couldn't this Pentagon "air crash" be made up just for dramatical purposes?
The truth is out there... too bad we're sitting on the wrong side of the line
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Florida Hill Country
Originally posted by hang10
What makes you think Oswald wasn't the only shooter? I have seen a lot of shows where "experts" on both sides have analyzed the Zapruder film. If just going off of that film, I would have to believe that Oswald did fire the first throat shot and the final head shot.
What makes you think Oswald wasn't the only shooter? I have seen a lot of shows where "experts" on both sides have analyzed the Zapruder film. If just going off of that film, I would have to believe that Oswald did fire the first throat shot and the final head shot.
Oswald may have been guilty, but so was some other people. Gee, Ruby is dead to!
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
My computer has a camera in it right now. Every time I try to get on one of those naughty sites, it freezes. 
I think it's time to smash it. But then I wouldn't be able to get on FTE. Betcha they planned it that way. 
I think it's time to smash it. But then I wouldn't be able to get on FTE. Betcha they planned it that way.
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Originally posted by drunkenmonk
heres one to call me a nut over.
on 9/11, do you think its possible we shot down the fourth plane, but didn't want the PR nightmare, and said the passengers took it down?
heres one to call me a nut over.
on 9/11, do you think its possible we shot down the fourth plane, but didn't want the PR nightmare, and said the passengers took it down?
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,698
Likes: 4
From: Neenah, Wisconsin
well heres what i think about 9/11....you can't convince me that all the people who saw the plane hit the pentagon were "seeing" things.....and secondly i don't care how the fourth plane went down...i think everyone on board is still a hero.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
Elder User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Billings, MT
I recall watching the news on Sept. 12th-ish and I think it was ABC that interviewed 2 people who'd gotten called from Flight 93 (the Pennsylvania one) that each said the family member they'd talked to spoke of the wings getting shot at. I never heard anything else on the matter again.
Now on one hand, we do know that the Air Force scrambled a couple of fighters to intercept Flt. 93, and the wreckage was more consistent with a shot-down airplane, but on the other hand, I was under the impression that if you wanted to shoot down an air-liner, an air-to-air missile would be the way to go as opposed to punching holes in the wings with a jet fighter's machine gun.
Even though I doubt the AF tried to use the gun to take down the plane, it wouldn't surprise me if it was indeed shot down.
Now on one hand, we do know that the Air Force scrambled a couple of fighters to intercept Flt. 93, and the wreckage was more consistent with a shot-down airplane, but on the other hand, I was under the impression that if you wanted to shoot down an air-liner, an air-to-air missile would be the way to go as opposed to punching holes in the wings with a jet fighter's machine gun.
Even though I doubt the AF tried to use the gun to take down the plane, it wouldn't surprise me if it was indeed shot down.
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Originally posted by the law
I recall watching the news on Sept. 12th-ish and I think it was ABC that interviewed 2 people who'd gotten called from Flight 93 (the Pennsylvania one) that each said the family member they'd talked to spoke of the wings getting shot at. I never heard anything else on the matter again.
Now on one hand, we do know that the Air Force scrambled a couple of fighters to intercept Flt. 93, and the wreckage was more consistent with a shot-down airplane, but on the other hand, I was under the impression that if you wanted to shoot down an air-liner, an air-to-air missile would be the way to go as opposed to punching holes in the wings with a jet fighter's machine gun.
Even though I doubt the AF tried to use the gun to take down the plane, it wouldn't surprise me if it was indeed shot down.
I recall watching the news on Sept. 12th-ish and I think it was ABC that interviewed 2 people who'd gotten called from Flight 93 (the Pennsylvania one) that each said the family member they'd talked to spoke of the wings getting shot at. I never heard anything else on the matter again.
Now on one hand, we do know that the Air Force scrambled a couple of fighters to intercept Flt. 93, and the wreckage was more consistent with a shot-down airplane, but on the other hand, I was under the impression that if you wanted to shoot down an air-liner, an air-to-air missile would be the way to go as opposed to punching holes in the wings with a jet fighter's machine gun.
Even though I doubt the AF tried to use the gun to take down the plane, it wouldn't surprise me if it was indeed shot down.
They might use guns in an attempt to disable the plane in order to force a landing- thus saving some lives. A missle is much less precise.
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,736
Likes: 1
From: The County
hmmmmm
I never thought much about it but it did seem strange that that plane seemed to have come down at a strange angle.It didn,t skid like a lot of plane crashes.This conspiracy theory makes more sense than a lot of the other off the wall theories of weather machines,holograms of jesus,earthquake machines,etc.Theres a lot of vivid imaginations out there
New User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Re: Re: hmmmmm
Then, what's with the fighters that were dispatched over the airliner?
I don't believe they were sent there just to escort the plane but to take it down before it reached its target and cause a bigger mess... then again, that's MHO
I don't believe they were sent there just to escort the plane but to take it down before it reached its target and cause a bigger mess... then again, that's MHO
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Speaking of airliners- what was that flight that disentigrated while flying out of JFK in New York- also during the Olympics.
Government says wires in fuel tank caused it.
Then there are lots of people who claim to see missles going up towards the plane.
Government says wires in fuel tank caused it.
Then there are lots of people who claim to see missles going up towards the plane.