Notices
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  

238/80???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2026 | 04:31 PM
  #16  
fordman67's Avatar
fordman67
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14,375
Likes: 604
From: evansville in
I towed with 250/200 and an s467.7. it towed awesome,never hazed at idle and if I let it would have surely killed my stock 350k e4od (it's still alive with regular service btw).
Imo you have to have 4.10 gears to tow much. I had lots of issues with towing with 3.55s original to my truck. After the 4.10s I could tow at Interstate speed with cruise on and not kick out of Od in southern indiana.
To run a big set of stix you have to imo have enough turbo,gears,and fuel. Sure you can buy 400/400 but when you turn them down to a spit amount why have the big injectiors even? Unpopular opinion is 90% of the 7.3 have way larger than ever utilized injectors for absolutely no reason.Your stock connecting rods will fail before you actually use all the fuel you think you need. I killed my original short block . When I pulled it apart the rod that broke showed fatigue and there was another cracked half way thru just wating for its evacuation sequence. I also found severe main cap fretting due to main cap walk. If you want to build an engine to use much more fuel than a 160 then this build just got way more expensive .
Me personally,I sold the 250/200s put a good used engine in with some 160s and a gear head tune that tows fine and won't evacuate my crankcase. If I'm being mean to it I can put it in the old 250/200 tow tune and it makes all the boost and smoke I could ever need.Yes I am still running the s367.7 and it spools just great and I'm happier with my combo. I never put the head studs,valve springs,pushrods,t500 back in even

Save your money and just buy some 160s or spend that big money.
I'm NOT the first to have this but you can sure be the next .
If you want to see the fatigue pics of my broken rod I can share also.
 

Last edited by fordman67; May 5, 2026 at 04:35 PM.
Reply
Old May 7, 2026 | 09:14 AM
  #17  
Hit Man X's Avatar
Hit Man X
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,519
Likes: 2,028
From: North Texas
I always tell folks about your rod failure, believe he had them too @kameronth with a few bent. @427 fordman stated he did pure beef rods for that reason, due to fatigue and the build.

Curious the limit for a reliable, upgraded fairly stock 7.3 Maybe 325-350rwhp? Which I guess around 650-700rwtq.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2026 | 08:29 AM
  #18  
fordman67's Avatar
fordman67
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14,375
Likes: 604
From: evansville in
Originally Posted by Hit Man X
I always tell folks about your rod failure, believe he had them too @kameronth with a few bent. @427 fordman stated he did pure beef rods for that reason, due to fatigue and the build.

Curious the limit for a reliable, upgraded fairly stock 7.3 Maybe 325-350rwhp? Which I guess around 650-700rwtq.
That is a real good question that I'm not sure we could answer deftinitively. I just hate seeing people buy huge injectors,spend a bunch of money and kill their engine while having them turned down in the tune all for no more than what a 160 would do. We need to have much more air than most have with less fuel than everyone thinks they need. Yes we need more than stock inj can provide. I'm going to stop now because I could type another page of personal theory but nobody really wants to read that lol
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2026 | 08:35 AM
  #19  
fordman67's Avatar
fordman67
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14,375
Likes: 604
From: evansville in
Originally Posted by Hit Man X
I always tell folks about your rod failure, believe he had them too @kameronth with a few bent. @427 fordman stated he did pure beef rods for that reason, due to fatigue and the build.

Curious the limit for a reliable, upgraded fairly stock 7.3 Maybe 325-350rwhp? Which I guess around 650-700rwtq.
And "stainlesstroker95" Gabe killed his I'd dare say fatigue rod with 238/80 and an s366. He doesn't beat on it and it failed just cruising down the highway to work.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2026 | 07:59 PM
  #20  
427 fordman's Avatar
427 fordman
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 10,408
Likes: 75
From: Plankinton, SD
To be honest with you I'd be worried about the rods with anything much more than a chip on stock sticks. They are 30 years old. Fatigue sets in after a while. Heck, I had 160/0 stage ones and I hit over 40 lbs of boost. I blew my original motor up with those. Broke a piston. Rods survived but I wasn't trying my luck with them in my new build.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2026 | 06:05 PM
  #21  
fordman67's Avatar
fordman67
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14,375
Likes: 604
From: evansville in
Originally Posted by 427 fordman
To be honest with you I'd be worried about the rods with anything much more than a chip on stock sticks. They are 30 years old. Fatigue sets in after a while. Heck, I had 160/0 stage ones and I hit over 40 lbs of boost. I blew my original motor up with those. Broke a piston. Rods survived but I wasn't trying my luck with them in my new build.
I agree with you! I need to honestly concentrate some effort on a real engine build. That's why I never put head studs,vs,pushrods in this engine. Idk my ultimate plan tho with family demands,other projects etc that it'll be anytime soon. I just keep it on the gear head small tow tune and hope for the best by not beating on it.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bak20042
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
11
Jun 28, 2025 08:30 AM
kz908
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
25
Aug 7, 2021 07:56 AM
Colorado350
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
30
Dec 13, 2020 12:29 PM
fatrat
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
18
Jul 22, 2007 06:53 AM
Reidicus
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
15
Oct 26, 2006 07:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE