When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Another data point: I have had my CNC stage 1 since 3/3/2018. It has been driven 57,413 miles since then. It drives my 205/80 injectors just fine.
Perhaps we should start a HPOP Matrix. Paging @RacinJasonWV to the white courtesy phone please.
Well, my new data point for the new Stage 2 is install of 11/20/25 and the truck odometer is 400126. The old was 3/2023...I'd have to figure the miles out. I searched my FB for a picture of the odod.....300300 miles...5/17/2017. So that's 100k miles in 8.5 years, making the average 980miles/month. That would make the original Stage 2 have 31,360...assuming the average stayed the same....which I doubt it has.
Another data point: I have had my CNC stage 1 since 3/3/2018. It has been driven 57,413 miles since then. It drives my 205/80 injectors just fine.
Perhaps we should start a HPOP Matrix. Paging @RacinJasonWV to the white courtesy phone please.
You're welcome to download the turbo matrix excel file to use as a template.
I’m still rocking the original HPOP on mine with no real plans for an upgrade, so don’t really have anything to contribute to this. Happy to be a consultant though.
I think we can all agree that Performance/ upgrades come at several costs and a shorter life expectancy. There might be other factors in there like oil change intervals, oil filters used, how hard the truck is driven, etc, IDK
I do know, I haven't had the greatest of luck through the years but luckily, I don't drive too many miles per yr anymore
I think we can all agree that Performance/ upgrades come at several costs and a shorter life expectancy. There might be other factors in there like oil change intervals, oil filters used, how hard the truck is driven, etc, IDK
I do know, I haven't had the greatest of luck through the years but luckily, I don't drive too many miles per yr anymore
I have to agree with that,
just last night, I got to wondering how much my Excursion has been used this current year.
62 miles
My son scolded me but good on that, told me to start alternating what vehicle I drive to town. So, I got out today, and started the Excursion to Jump start the '99 Cummins, that battery was down to 11.95 and the starter just groaned but the 5.9 didn't start up.
So, after the Dodge had enough juice to whirl the starter, I drove both vehicles around the outside streets of town, to get them warmed up before shutting down for the night, both are on Battery Tenders now. The Excursion always is, the Dodge was out in the pasture in the South 40, no power there...
You're welcome to download the turbo matrix excel file to use as a template.
I’m still rocking the original HPOP on mine with no real plans for an upgrade, so don’t really have anything to contribute to this. Happy to be a consultant though.
I was a Program/Project Manager in a previous life. I’m really good at delegating.
I'm going to come back and tell you all the final resolution on the Stage 2 HPOP from CNC Fab.
I had chatted with Eric and he stated that CNC Fab was going to work something out on the replacement HPOP. I figured they might increase the core credit 100-200 more. That would have been fine as it was out of warranty...low miles but out of warranty.
I received a text from Eric yesterday stating that CNC Fab traced the serial number of the failed HPOP to a run of about 20 HPOP's that had a machining defect. So CNC Fab is straight up covering the replacement. That's pretty stand up in my opinion.
Not to be a sourpuss but why didn’t they inform all owners of the affected pumps before it left you stranded?
Out of that small batch of pumps, there were a very few early failures right away, like 3, that upon inspection it was determined those few swash housings had issue. The entire batch was not subjected to that issue. It has now been a year and a half since any other pump from that batch had issue.
As such, being that Dans hpop failure was not able to be directly determined, and showed zero signs of failure from issue other than the pump itself, and the fact it was part of that specific batch, it was decided the proper thing to do was to cover the replacement purchased to assist in lessening the cost he incurred from the failure.
I have to agree with that,
just last night, I got to wondering how much my Excursion has been used this current year.
62 miles
My son scolded me but good on that, told me to start alternating what vehicle I drive to town. So, I got out today, and started the Excursion to Jump start the '99 Cummins, that battery was down to 11.95 and the starter just groaned but the 5.9 didn't start up.
Poor Excursion...that's okay, you got a few miles on it last year
Yeah, probably a good idea to get them out at least once a month if you can.
I have the starter turning the engine over now. Looking for what parameters I should look for on my scan tool (AE) to diagnose the no start. As it stands right now, I have zero ICP when cranking. I'm going to check for fuel flow and cranking rpm, but would like the handy list.
Edit: I looked at three data
Cranking rpm = 200
IPR duty cycle = 64%
ICP - this would fluctuate between 0 and 12 psi. Unplugging I would see 2400 or whatever the default is.
I tested the ICP harness, I'm confident that everything is fine with that.
And the fuel pump is running. I have yet to put a gauge on that though.
Don’t mean to hijack your thread but this seems to be the exact topic I’m currently trying to understand about my crank, no start situation.
I’m wondering about my IPR not working properly. I pulled the solenoid and put 12v to it and it’s magnetizing that way.
But hooked to a scan tool I’m seeing the duty cycle in the 50s. Is that too high?
I don’t fully understand all of it but from my reading it shouldn’t be over 20% when cranking? Seems like I’m building enough oil pressure per what the scan tool says? I’m new to all of this, so forgive me if you have to break it down dummy style lol
IPR duty cycle is a commanded value from the PCM. It’s not showing actual IPR response, just what the PCM wants it to do.
Was your scan tool set to psi? It appears to show that as the units on the right. But those numbers look high.
I would try disconnecting the ICP sensor which will take it out of the equation. I don’t think it’s going to solve your issue but it’s a quick and free test.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.