When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
If I understand you right, you want (us) to prove something that is unprovable...right? Nice way to set up those who wish to bite at small bait. As someone who is as sure about the existance of GOD as you are sure about Him being false, I would like to pose a question to you:
Are you willing to accept a challenge? That is, do you really want to know?
So, Waxy you couldn't hold your own on a level playing field so you built a slanted one and want everyone to come on over? I wish I had thought of that. Since we beat this old horse to death already I hope you will excuse me if I have to yawn here. By the way I thought you were holding your own in the other thread. Lets find a new controversial topic. I was thinking gun control but there are just too many rabid anti guncontrol people that are too ignorant and emotional about it for us to have an intelligent discussion like we did on billsco's thread. Same with politics but not quite as bad. Just alot of people that hate the incumbant no matter who he is. I was thinking maybe something on the B.I.A. or some other Government agency. NAACP? KKK? How about the occupation of Wounded knee in 1974? Anyone remember Leonard Peltier? Maybe too obscure, I suppose. Any suggestions?
Last edited by willowbilly3; Nov 27, 2003 at 09:26 PM.
Originally posted by willowbilly3 So, Waxy you couldn't hold your own on a level playing field so you built a slanted one and want everyone to come on over? I wish I had thought of that.
WHERE IS EVERYONE GETTING THIS FROM? SHEEEEESH.
IT'S A JOKE PEOPLE. TONGUE IN CHEEK. SARCASM.
I thought the 3 or 4 other times I posted on it made that pretty clear.
Originally posted by willowbilly3 . . I was thinking gun control but there are just too many rabid anti guncontrol people that are too ignorant and emotional about it for us to have an intelligent discussion like we did on billsco's thread. . . .
Huuummmmm. ' guess I missed those Mr. Willowbilly3. Though, I have followed and contributed to most of the treads you speak of.
I wonder if you might be so kind as to substantiate your statement? I must admit, at first glance I find it profoundly offensive - for some reason.
Sorry if I offended you fuzzy. I am not a gun control advocate but I have found the very mention of it to send people clamouring for the gun slots in their fortress. I have questioned the need for semi automatic assault weapons in a couple other threads and was just glad an AR-15 couldn't fire through the internet. All I really wanted to do was discuss it intelligently and wasn't advocating anything.
Just something about the subject seems to turn many relativley normal peopel into paranoid hatemongers.
Why don't you throw something out there in a nuetral way and see for yourself what I mean.
Sorry Waxy, I was just pokin a little at you. I thought you would see it in the light I posted. I didn't mean to jump on the dogpile. I guess we both get seated in the misunderstood section.
waxy, I say things all the time that people take in a way I didn't intend. I shouldn't have been teasing you when you were already under attack and on the defensive. Thanks for backing me up.