When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
That's what I am thinking, but have not been able to confirm yet. There is some debate about the crank too. It is shorter stroke than the 7.3L but some sources say it's cast, some say forged.
That's what I am thinking, but have not been able to confirm yet. There is some debate about the crank too. It is shorter stroke than the 7.3L but some sources say it's cast, some say forged.
Crank is cast. No debate there.
The shorter stroke is from shorter rods. Deck height of blocks are probably the same.
Thanks for all the replys, it does appear the blocks are the same between the 7.3L and the 6.8L. The crank is the only notable difference. The 6.8L must either use a longer rod or a piston with the pin located lower to compensate for the shorter crank throws.
The other question I can't seem to find an answer to is how much does a bare 7.3L (or 6.8L) block weight? I can't believe no one has weighed one yet, but all I can find so far are inaccurate guesses.
Thanks for all the replys, it does appear the blocks are the same between the 7.3L and the 6.8L. The crank is the only notable difference. The 6.8L must either use a longer rod or a piston with the pin located lower to compensate for the shorter crank throws.
The other question I can't seem to find an answer to is how much does a bare 7.3L (or 6.8L) block weight? I can't believe no one has weighed one yet, but all I can find so far are inaccurate guesses.
10.8 compression on 6.8 vs 10.5 on the 7.3 is a difference, but why it is different is still unclear.
All I want in my 6.8 is not to have the 7.3 lifters.
I was planning to take my motor out and weigh it but I keep getting side tracked. Hopefully I will get this motor weighed soon.
I don't think it makes sense for Ford to redesign the head for a 6.8. The pistons are likely to be the same, with only the rods being a little longer. The little bump in compression is probably gained in rod length.
I don't think it makes sense for Ford to redesign the head for a 6.8. The pistons are likely to be the same, with only the rods being a little longer. The little bump in compression is probably gained in rod length.
Increasing rod length to increase compression assumes that the 7.3 piston surface is below the block deck surface which I don't think it is.