Quarterhorse vs Tweecar using Binary Editor?
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 508
Likes: 29
From: NE Ohio
Quarterhorse vs Tweecar using Binary Editor?
Been using Quarterhorse and Binary Editor for years. Well, when my brothers buddy went to open the hood with the engine running, he yanked on the USB connector thinking it was the hood release, yaked out the chip, and engine died. QH will no longer take a tune. Honest mistake, hell make it right.
That being said, QH seller shut down in the last year, and I'm getting a little run around from another seller. Debating on just going with Tweecar RT.
Can anyone confirm Tweecar with BE will still do live display, and allow to scale wideband through EGR pin input? Im hoping there's no difference in usage between the two chips when using Binary Editor, but would like to confirm if anyone has experience.
Thanks,
-glaser67
That being said, QH seller shut down in the last year, and I'm getting a little run around from another seller. Debating on just going with Tweecar RT.
Can anyone confirm Tweecar with BE will still do live display, and allow to scale wideband through EGR pin input? Im hoping there's no difference in usage between the two chips when using Binary Editor, but would like to confirm if anyone has experience.
Thanks,
-glaser67
FTE Legend
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Yes Tweecer RT does live data and a wideband can also be patched in.. can't remember exactly how I did that now but I know I had it working. I think the Tweecer has a limit on how many parameters can be monitored in real time while Quarterhorse can do more, but I think that is more because it uses more modern hardware.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pappys53
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
Dec 10, 2022 04:21 PM
GM in a Ford
2017 - 2022 Super Duty
49
Jan 20, 2022 04:20 PM
302FORDF100
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
114
Aug 2, 2005 09:16 PM
