Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

Tranny coolers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2021 | 09:20 AM
  #16  
hobohilton's Avatar
hobohilton
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 219
From: Northwest
This is the best FTE discussion of the week.... Continue on.

Hobo
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2021 | 09:59 AM
  #17  
BlueWhiteFord's Avatar
BlueWhiteFord
More Turbo
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 563
Likes: 4
From: Wolfsburg
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
Have you measured this, or just done a thought experiment? A thought experiment is where you just think through what will happen without testing it. When I was an automatic transmission cooling engineer I tested this extensively. THE RADIATOR *COOLER* NEVER WARMS THE ATF. The colder the ambient air the more the radiator *COOLER* cools the ATF. It never, ever, ever warms the ATF.
The radiator *COOLER* is in the side of the radiator where the engine coolant has already been cooled. At very low temps the engine thermostat only opens for a very short time. Hot coolant is sent to the radiator in spurts. The coolant spends a lot of time sitting in the radiator where it is cooled to near ambient temperatures. Then this near ambient coolant hits the trans cooler. How can coolant at or below 0°F heat the ATF? It can't happen.


Wrong. This shows a lack of understanding how the ATF is cooled. See above.


This is just plain wrong.
This is interesting. I am glad that someone that has in-depth experience is joining in. I stand corrected as well.
The only thing I would want to know is if there is a possibility for the ATF to get too cold? Judging by what you said that does not seem to be possible.

Applying that to the original question, is there anything speaking against running an external cooler, without tieing it into the radiator?

 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2021 | 10:13 AM
  #18  
rd65's Avatar
rd65
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 17
From: PNW-Western WA
Have you measured this, or just done a thought experiment? A thought experiment is where you just think through what will happen without testing it. When I was an automatic transmission cooling engineer I tested this extensively. THE RADIATOR *COOLER* NEVER WARMS THE ATF. The colder the ambient air the more the radiator *COOLER* cools the ATF. It never, ever, ever warms the ATF.
The radiator *COOLER* is in the side of the radiator where the engine coolant has already been cooled. At very low temps the engine thermostat only opens for a very short time. Hot coolant is sent to the radiator in spurts. The coolant spends a lot of time sitting in the radiator where it is cooled to near ambient temperatures. Then this near ambient coolant hits the trans cooler. How can coolant at or below 0°F heat the ATF? It can't happen.

So much good feedback on this post.
So back to my original question - Can I bypass the radiator cooler and just use the auxiliary cooler mounted in front of the radiator? I am new to this truck and know nothing of its past. The odo shows 92K and I am pretty sure that is true miles and not rolled over. The trans fluid that came out did not have any off smell to it. While it is a 40 yo rad I would rather not replace it just to replace it. If the rad develops a leak I would rather is leaked onto the ground vs into a trans line. If I need to continue to run trans through it I will but if it isn't necessary I say why risk it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2021 | 03:19 PM
  #19  
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Frmr Ford Trans Engr
25 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 24,725
Likes: 2,651
From: SE Florida
Originally Posted by BlueWhiteFord
This is interesting. I am glad that someone that has in-depth experience is joining in. I stand corrected as well.
The only thing I would want to know is if there is a possibility for the ATF to get too cold? Judging by what you said that does not seem to be possible.
Yes, that can happen. Later model transmissions have a thermostat that bypasses the coolers when the trans is cold. Ford's first trans with a thermostat was the 5R110W. It only sent 10% of the normal flow to the coolers until the trans was warmer than 165°F.

Before I left Ford we were talking about using hot engine coolant from the heater lines to heat the trans when cold. I left before we started testing this theory, and I haven't checked to see if they ever implemented this.

Originally Posted by BlueWhiteFord
Applying that to the original question, is there anything speaking against running an external cooler, without tieing it into the radiator?
Yes, there is. It's insufficient cooling. The radiator cooler does the majority of the heat extraction. Without this cooler, you lose a lot of cooling capacity. If you don't work the truck hard you will probably not have a problem. If you are running near its limits you will probably overheat the trans without the radiator cooler.

Originally Posted by rd65
So back to my original question - Can I bypass the radiator cooler and just use the auxiliary cooler mounted in front of the radiator?
You can, but see my caveat, above.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2021 | 10:42 PM
  #20  
rd65's Avatar
rd65
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 17
From: PNW-Western WA
What would be the correct fluid for this trans? Some say Type F, others Dexron III.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2021 | 08:24 AM
  #21  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,984
Likes: 2,738
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
The 1980-up transmissions used Dexron type fluid. Does it say anything stamped on the end of the dipstick? Sometimes they stamp the type of fluid it takes on it somewhere.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2021 | 12:41 PM
  #22  
rd65's Avatar
rd65
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 17
From: PNW-Western WA
Originally Posted by Franklin2
The 1980-up transmissions used Dexron type fluid. Does it say anything stamped on the end of the dipstick? Sometimes they stamp the type of fluid it takes on it somewhere.
Yes, it has something on it but the stick is rusty in that area so I will need to do a little clean up to read it. Looks like a Ford part number.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2021 | 11:07 PM
  #23  
rd65's Avatar
rd65
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 17
From: PNW-Western WA
Dipstick reads ESP-M2C138-CJ OIL
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 31, 2021 | 07:26 AM
  #24  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,984
Likes: 2,738
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by rd65
Dipstick reads ESP-M2C138-CJ OIL
And what did you get when you copied "ESP-M2C138-CJ OIL" and put it in a google search box?
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2021 | 08:28 AM
  #25  
hobohilton's Avatar
hobohilton
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 219
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by rd65
Dipstick reads ESP-M2C138-CJ OIL
_________________________

Older discussion on this topic:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/5...ternative.html

Hobo
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2021 | 03:23 PM
  #26  
rd65's Avatar
rd65
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 17
From: PNW-Western WA
Originally Posted by Franklin2
And what did you get when you copied "ESP-M2C138-CJ OIL" and put it in a google search box?
Comes up as Dex/Merc but that doesnt mean they F might not be better right?
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2021 | 08:43 AM
  #27  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,984
Likes: 2,738
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by rd65
Comes up as Dex/Merc but that doesnt mean they F might not be better right?
Do you have some logic behind that statement? I have heard you can swap fluids if you want the tranny to shift more firm, but I have forgotten which way you swap. You do not want to swap the wrong way or it will make the tranny slip. I would just stick with the recommended fluid.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2021 | 09:53 AM
  #28  
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Frmr Ford Trans Engr
25 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 24,725
Likes: 2,651
From: SE Florida
Originally Posted by rd65
Comes up as Dex/Merc but that doesnt mean they F might not be better right?
I'm sure you know which fluid is better more than Ford would know. I'm sure you have built many more transmissions than Ford could possibly have made.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2021 | 09:53 AM
  #29  
rd65's Avatar
rd65
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 17
From: PNW-Western WA
Originally Posted by Franklin2
Do you have some logic behind that statement? I have heard you can swap fluids if you want the tranny to shift more firm, but I have forgotten which way you swap. You do not want to swap the wrong way or it will make the tranny slip. I would just stick with the recommended fluid.
Just different people saying different things when I googled the number on the dipstick. I am fine with stock fluid, just wanting to be sure that was the best option since it was back when the change was first made. Look how well they did with emission controls back then. Everything was new and not necessarily better.
 
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2021 | 10:15 AM
  #30  
rd65's Avatar
rd65
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 17
From: PNW-Western WA
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
I'm sure you know which fluid is better more than Ford would know. I'm sure you have built many more transmissions than Ford could possibly have made.
Geez Mark, calm down. I didnt say I know anything. That is why I am asking. Maybe Ford rushed into something, maybe the old fluid worked better, things happen. No one is attacking anyone that I can see. I was hoping someone that is more of an expert would weigh in vs others that have posted on other sites when I googled the part number on the dipstick. Other things I have read lead me to think that maybe, just maybe the older Type F was a better way to go.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lud04X
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
9
Aug 15, 2016 09:21 AM
cohomology
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
1
Jun 24, 2016 12:18 PM
wastingas
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
14
Nov 25, 2012 04:24 PM
Franko72
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
3
Aug 11, 2010 05:12 PM
jackstraw
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
5
Dec 15, 2009 07:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE