Notices
Offroad & 4x4
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Auto Vs. Manual....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2020 | 10:12 AM
  #1  
PoorUserName's Avatar
PoorUserName
Thread Starter
|
5th Wheeling
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 41
Likes: 1
Auto Vs. Manual....

Need some expertise from someone better versed than myself. As I understand it, today, the auto is more valued for offroad due to improvements in gearing (ratios and # of gears), control over shifts, and internal Tq. multiplication.

As far as the Tq multiplication...How much advantage does an auto have over a manual if both have IDENTICAL ratios? Will a ZF6 with a 5.79 granny low still allow more efficient power application than a 6R140 with a 3.79 1st gear?

The reason I am asking is I want to find the most ideal combo possible for increasing tire size, maintaining good cruise performance while still having better than stock off-road gearing.

Am I missing anything? Overthinking this?

Been using this to comparing trannies, gearing, tire sizes etc...
Gear Ratio Calculator

Thanks all.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2020 | 09:25 PM
  #2  
Mickey Bitsko's Avatar
Mickey Bitsko
More Turbo
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 749
Likes: 93
From: Pagosa Springs CO.
Automatics have always been more desirable for rock crawling but they have limitations like overheating , there's nothing wrong with it manual either if you know how to use them.
pick your poison, which are you more comfortable with?

 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2020 | 08:41 AM
  #3  
PoorUserName's Avatar
PoorUserName
Thread Starter
|
5th Wheeling
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 41
Likes: 1
Yeah no rock crawling in my future. My main focus is though, the "TQ multiplication advantage" of autos and how that translates or compares to manuals. The ZF6-750 has like a low gear that is about 75% deeper numerically than the really low for an auto, 6R140... Does the "Tq multiplication" of the auto overcome that difference in the real world?

Even the ZF6 2nd gear is quite deeper than the 1st gear in my 4R100....

Originally Posted by Mickey Bitsko
Automatics have always been more desirable for rock crawling but they have limitations like overheating , there's nothing wrong with it manual either if you know how to use them.
pick your poison, which are you more comfortable with?
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2020 | 06:37 PM
  #4  
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,006
Likes: 71
From: Roseville, MN
I don't have much experience 'wheeling an auto, so take this for what it's worth. But what I've read is that the torque converter is equal to about a 2:1 gear reduction. If that holds true, then an auto with a 3:1 first gear would be about the equivalent of a manual with a 6:1 first gear.

That said, that's only when you are trying to put power down. An auto with a 3:1 first gear is worse at compression braking than a manual with a 3:1. Maybe the same 2:1 holds and it's equivalent to 1.5:1 with a manual???
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2020 | 11:56 PM
  #5  
Evan76's Avatar
Evan76
Laughing Gas
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 865
Likes: 157
But in first gear the transmission is fluid coupled as tourqe converter isn't lock. This produce essesive heat.

Low gears or normal 3.55 gears with.
BlackBox-i NP205 Titan Series

 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2021 | 06:12 AM
  #6  
Rovernut's Avatar
Rovernut
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 5
From: Georgia
I've had too many drained batteries or dead starters over the years to ever willingly buy an automatic.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
YoungFordAddict66
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
7
Dec 31, 2008 08:31 PM
eric777
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
45
Jan 17, 2008 11:25 PM
MW95F250
General Automotive Discussion
46
Jan 26, 2004 02:43 AM
D-mon
Offroad & 4x4
24
Sep 15, 2003 06:02 PM
wolfmanagh
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
16
Apr 22, 2002 11:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.