Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Panel Bond Testing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2019 | 12:28 PM
  #16  
bjmayberry2's Avatar
bjmayberry2
Lead Driver
Veteran: National Guard
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,735
Likes: 823
From: Wentzville, MO
Club FTE Gold Member
That definitely counters the argument that panel bond (at least what you used) is as good as a weld.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2019 | 02:08 PM
  #17  
CharlieLed's Avatar
CharlieLed
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,094
Likes: 654
From: Brentwood, TN
Club FTE Gold Member
Something is wrong with that adhesive, either that or there is just not enough of it in the joint. Whatever the case, testing should reflect the actual conditions under which the part is being used. Does this "peeling back" of the joined metal mimic the stresses that the part would be subjected to under normal use? The metals that I use are not so thin as to peel away. When a thin strip bends then all the force applied is concentrated at a single point/edge of adhesion instead of being distributed across a broad surface area. That is the beauty of panel adhesive over weld...more structural integrity is achieved due to a broader area of adhesion.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2019 | 04:49 PM
  #18  
gerrymoe's Avatar
gerrymoe
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 806
Likes: 95
From: Madera Ranchos
Club FTE Gold Member
Do a test with a pc 1x2x6 x same gauge as being used in the application. Do the pull test from the center for a more even pull. This should give you a closer strength test of the actual application.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2019 | 05:15 PM
  #19  
clintonvillian's Avatar
clintonvillian
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 20
From: West Virginia
Originally Posted by CharlieLed
Something is wrong with that adhesive, either that or there is just not enough of it in the joint. Whatever the case, testing should reflect the actual conditions under which the part is being used. Does this "peeling back" of the joined metal mimic the stresses that the part would be subjected to under normal use? The metals that I use are not so thin as to peel away. When a thin strip bends then all the force applied is concentrated at a single point/edge of adhesion instead of being distributed across a broad surface area. That is the beauty of panel adhesive over weld...more structural integrity is achieved due to a broader area of adhesion.
Originally Posted by gerrymoe
Do a test with a pc 1x2x6 x same gauge as being used in the application. Do the pull test from the center for a more even pull. This should give you a closer strength test of the actual application.
It is the same guage as most panels on our trucks.

Both pieces were squirted with a bead, and then brushed out. Look at the squeeze out on the edges. There was plenty of material. This is 3M 08115 purchases on a couple different dates. I really don't think there is anything wrong with it. If there was it would fail the sheer test.

I used 3/8" because that is the common overlap using a flange tool.

I do think the T-peel test is a pretty good representative of real world conditions. If a patch is hit in the middle it would put sheer force on the edges and be fine. HOWEVER, if one edge were to get hit or come loose the panel could be peeled off relatively easily.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2019 | 07:41 AM
  #20  
Greg Rogers's Avatar
Greg Rogers
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 295
From: Central Michigan
This is very interesting to me though I have never used panel adhesive yet. I think the test you are using would make any adhesive fail. Because you are bending the sheet metal as you pull it. This wouldn't happen in a real world situation, unless a collision, say another car trying to rip off your fender..? It seems if the load was all along the piece then it would hold. What I an saying is you are destroying the piece of sheet metal as you are bending it/ making it come apart- right? Say you had 2 flat pieces of steel you bonded together and some huge force came along and started to pull and bend one of the Pieces at the end. As it pulled it ruined the piece ( made it not flat) and separated the bond. So is it a moot point that the bond eventually failed as the piece was already bent and probably destroyed anyway? If you took 2 pieces of 2" square tubing and bonded them together and them tried to pull them apart evenly, I think that would be a more accurate test as you wouldn't have the bending first.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2019 | 12:26 PM
  #21  
CharlieLed's Avatar
CharlieLed
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,094
Likes: 654
From: Brentwood, TN
Club FTE Gold Member
It's your call...personally if I was looking to perform a meaningful test I would set up the test conditions to mirror my application. In your case, a section of hood metal and a section of louver panel and bond them together just the way they would be on your "production" hood. Apply forces to the test panel that you would expect to see on your "production" hood and see how the bond holds. An egg will support a lot more weight than any portion of it's shell alone.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rsh1966
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
18
Jul 4, 2018 07:12 PM
Twitchyleprechaun
Excursion - King of SUVs
3
Nov 16, 2014 01:28 PM
Indybeer
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
17
Sep 29, 2012 09:39 AM
whateg01
1947 and Older Ford Trucks
4
Aug 31, 2010 03:36 AM
nordvik72
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
24
Oct 19, 2009 04:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE