'79 F350, 400 ci Carburetor suggestions
#1
'79 F350, 400 ci Carburetor suggestions
Hey, Everybody.
I'm looking to replace/upgrade the current carburetor in my truck. The main problem is that I don't really know much about carburetors. I am really looking for someone to steer me in the right direction for what to buy, and also what the stock carburetor flange shape is?
I'm happy to post more info as needed, thanks.
I'm looking to replace/upgrade the current carburetor in my truck. The main problem is that I don't really know much about carburetors. I am really looking for someone to steer me in the right direction for what to buy, and also what the stock carburetor flange shape is?
I'm happy to post more info as needed, thanks.
#2
#4
Me personally, I changed mine to an edelbrock 4 barrel intake nd carburetor. I was having increasing problems with the heat riser spacer, and most of my related emissions stuff attached to that were missing. I upgraded to the edelbrock carb and intake and it has never run better, and I got a slight increase in MPG, as the primaries are smaller.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Unless you are going to do more work to the engine, the 2bbl in the correct size is just right.
Size guide. Going one bigger won't hurt.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...eral-info.html
Size guide. Going one bigger won't hurt.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...eral-info.html
#9
#10
#11
my first new rig was a '79 f150 SWB 4x4 I bought in 1980 with a 400 in it. the week I bought it I stripped all the smog crap off and put dual exhaust on it. I still remember racing my buddy who had a '66 chevy pickup with a stock 283 the day I bought it and he blew my doors off. that was humiliating . I still own 2 Fords my dad bought new but they've been converted to 385 series engines and we still use them on the ranch.
I'll never understand why Ford chose to ditch the FE in favor of the vastly inferior 351-400 but I assume it was for cost savings. I've head emissions was the reason but that makes no sense they could have done the same thing to the FE.
I'll never understand why Ford chose to ditch the FE in favor of the vastly inferior 351-400 but I assume it was for cost savings. I've head emissions was the reason but that makes no sense they could have done the same thing to the FE.
#12
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
13 Posts
The GM vs. Ford debate has been going on too long. Same as the 400 vs. 460. Another debate thread is the last thing this forum needs.
We're all driving Fords, we're all mostly using old technology too. In my books, it's a win-win regardless of whatever we're using for a power plant because we're driving something the EPA wants to get rid of. My point is, keep these old gems on the road. It doesn't matter what's under the hood.
#13
#14
I replaced mine because the 35 YO original was gunked up and running badly. '78 F250 with 400. An Autoline brand reman carb from Autozone has worked well for me... at least 6 years.
At some point I will re-build the engine for more power... more compression, cam headers ect. Then a 4 bbl or EFI. For now with stock type engine, the reman Ford carb works great.
At some point I will re-build the engine for more power... more compression, cam headers ect. Then a 4 bbl or EFI. For now with stock type engine, the reman Ford carb works great.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mr Brownsnake
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
09-07-2002 08:35 PM
john
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
08-18-1999 08:21 PM