Notices
7.3L / 6.8L V8 Gasoline Engines Discuss the new 7.3 and 6.8L Gasoline V8s

7.3L V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2019 | 09:51 AM
  #1  
someday's Avatar
someday
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 9
From: midwest
7.3L V8

heres hoping the new engine becomes an option?!
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2019 | 06:13 PM
  #2  
JKBrad's Avatar
JKBrad
Moderator
Veteran: Army
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,107
Likes: 1,171
From: San Antonio, TX
Club FTE Gold Member
What little specs I’ve seen suggests it will be a low rev push rod engine more suited for heavy duty use than high performance. But, everything is rumors now.

The old rumor was that the 6.2 OHC engine was going to be bumped up to a 7.0L, but that never happened.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2019 | 11:12 PM
  #3  
92F350CC's Avatar
92F350CC
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 5
From: Las Vegas
I don't think this will ever be seen in anything smaller than an F-250.

F-150 falls under CAFE and so Ford isn't going to stick a 10 mpg big block in it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2019 | 08:27 AM
  #4  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,478
Likes: 738
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
We can wish, but I don't think it's likely. 2015 marked a definite shift with the lightweighting of the body and the elimination of the 6.2 L engine as an option. The current available engines already produce far more power than the chassis can handle, so they perceived benefit of a 7.3 L option doesn't seem that great in my opinion. By every objective measure the HO 3.5L completely embarrasses the 6.2L in the previous Raptor, would a 7.3 I'll be any different? It would be substantially heavier, and weight isn't fast.

To put simply: what with the 7.3 L do that the 3.5L HO EcoBoost doesn't already do, but using significantly less gas?
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2019 | 03:20 PM
  #5  
someday's Avatar
someday
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 9
From: midwest
sound and no turbos for me. id buy a raptor with a 7.3l godzilla engine...rapgod...im not sure how cafe is calculated but raptor sales are probably such a small percentage

this was in another post

https://www.motor1.com/news/304772/f...-mustang-f150/
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2019 | 08:52 PM
  #6  
someday's Avatar
someday
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 9
From: midwest
originally started this thread in the f150 raptor forum.

i thought it was interesting that the new silverados have 10 speed 6.2ls with 420/460 while the HD 6 speed 6.6 have 401/464.

looks like ford should make the 6.2l available in the 150s again and bump up the power ratings. the 5.0l 395/400 is very similiar to SD 6.2l 385/430. i still think they should make the 7.3 available in the raptor or bring back the 6.2 with better than 411/434

im keeping low expectations for the 7.3 but this thing should have big power numbers ~450-500/600
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2019 | 11:01 AM
  #7  
dnewton3's Avatar
dnewton3
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 764
Likes: 30
someday - I think you're a bit over optimistic in your ratings, but it would be nice if so. 600 ft-lb on a production gas motor meeting emmisions? I don't believe it to be likely.

I'll guess HP at 400 +/- 10, somewhere around 4800 rpm.
I'll guess TQ at 520 +/- 10, somewhere around 3400rpm.

Anxiously waiting the official numbers.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2019 | 11:29 AM
  #8  
barry1me's Avatar
barry1me
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 255
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by dnewton3
someday - I think you're a bit over optimistic in your ratings, but it would be nice if so. 600 ft-lb on a production gas motor meeting emmisions? I don't believe it to be likely.

I'll guess HP at 400 +/- 10, somewhere around 4800 rpm.
I'll guess TQ at 520 +/- 10, somewhere around 3400rpm.

Anxiously waiting the official numbers.
I agree with you..I think it will be 425hp and 520 tq...if its at 3400rpms this will be a great towing motor.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2019 | 01:17 PM
  #9  
someday's Avatar
someday
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 9
From: midwest
if the 7.3l doesnt have 525+ ft lbs i will be disappointed
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2019 | 04:37 PM
  #10  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,478
Likes: 738
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by someday
if the 7.3l doesnt have 525+ ft lbs i will be disappointed
It would be nice, but I think that will be a bit of a stretch. Torque output is much more closely related to displacement than horsepower, as you can only shove so much air into those cylinders. Horsepower seems to vary significantly, because you can adjust the torque curve within the rpm band with cam profile and timing.

A lot of modern engines make an incredible amount of torque and horsepower for their size, but do so using the advantage of independent camshaft control for the intake and exhaust cams. Which is something that no Super Duty engine has ever had the benefit of.

We shall see, I hope I'm wrong!
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2019 | 07:03 PM
  #11  
someday's Avatar
someday
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 9
From: midwest
the 3.5l rator has 450/510!

if the new powerstroke is gonna be over 1000 ft lbs and the 7.3 is supposed to be in the middle somewhere...i think 600 should be a start towing 20,000# trailers
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2019 | 08:05 PM
  #12  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,478
Likes: 738
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by someday
the 3.5l rator has 450/510!

if the new powerstroke is gonna be over 1000 ft lbs and the 7.3 is supposed to be in the middle somewhere...i think 600 should be a start towing 20,000# trailers
The 3.5L Raptor isn't rated to survive towing those kinds of weights, either. Most semi trucks have less than 500 HP.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2019 | 08:25 PM
  #13  
someday's Avatar
someday
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 9
From: midwest
600 torque...id be happy with 400/600
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2019 | 10:56 PM
  #14  
onug's Avatar
onug
Cargo Master
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 4
From: Seattle area
Hp and Tq are one thing, price is another. Give me 450hp and 500ft-lbs for $1,000 and I start shopping for a SD.

Economy numbers will also be interesting. Hopefully the 10-speed tranny can keep them near the 6.2.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2019 | 11:18 PM
  #15  
SDDL-UP's Avatar
SDDL-UP
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 98
From: North Idaho
No way is Ford going to offer the 6.2 in more F150s IMO. Be glad they offer a V8 at all!

I'm hoping for 425HP / 535TQ in the new 7.3. There should be a TON of potential regardless if initial rated output. I want to know what the heads flow!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.