Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Getting messy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2018 | 05:24 PM
  #1  
swoosh1958's Avatar
swoosh1958
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Omaha,NE
Getting messy

I have a 1966 Ford F100 styleside. Trying to get it to fit on a 79 F150. The frame and springs being wider on the 79 poses issues with the back sides of the bed and fenders. I had put a 4" suspension lift on it. I thought if I do a rear shackle hanger flip 4.5" it would solve the clearance issue.It does,but causes other issues. With the 4" leaf springs and stock block the transfer case is 0 degree and 8.5" lift. The rear axle is 26 degree. So I took out the stock block( which was the plan) and added a 1.5"-2" 0 degree block I had laying around. Now the pinion angle is 20 degree. Getting closer. What is really starting to bug me is the lowest leaf on the spring pack really angles down and sticks out. I know I have to move the front rear hanger back about 2" to get the shackle angled correctly.So, what are my options?Move the front hanger back.Remove the 1.5"-2" 0 degree block and add a 20 degree block? Is that doable? Remove the lowest leaf? Get new stock leaf springs?Supposedly with the rear hanger flip and stock springs a 4 degree shim is needed. This just seems to be getting messy. Any input would be favored. Thanks

See the lowest leaf angled and sticking out? Hate that.

Stock hanger and shackle would run right into the bottom of the bed and the bolt head right into the inside of the rear fender. And that is with the bed raised 2". The flipped hanger helps with this and lets me lower the bed onto the frame, which lines it back up with the cab.
 

Last edited by swoosh1958; Oct 30, 2018 at 05:26 PM. Reason: No edit
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2018 | 05:29 PM
  #2  
swoosh1958's Avatar
swoosh1958
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Omaha,NE

See how the bolt and shackle would hit the bed and fender. The flip 4.5 hanger helped it not do this.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2018 | 07:25 PM
  #3  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,915
Likes: 4,123
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
Ok you want the out put of the trany / transfer case to be parallel to that of the pinion on the rear axle.
So if the trany / transfer case is pointing 4* down then the pinion has to point 4* up
You CAN NOT have the trany / transfer case at 0* and the pinion at 4* or you could run into issues with vibrations with the Ujoints spinning at different rates.

Now your spring issues. It looks like you don't have all the weight on the wheels as I think I see a horse with wood blocks under the frame in 1 of the pictures.
Now having all the weight on the suspension you CAN NOT tell what the springs / suspension will sit.
I bet once you get weight on the wheels that spring that is sticking out will not be that bad.
Also that shackle will push back more.

You also don't want to move the front spring hanger forward / back from factory as it will change the wheel base.
You are using a 4" lift spring and a rear spring hanger flip? If so what is the total lift and what are you doing up front?
Does the rear hanger flip have a front hanger flip to go with it that you are not using?

When you start swapping frames that are wider than the stock frame you will have to do some body fitting. In your case it looks like you will need to trim and finish the fenders and ? to clear the hanger / shackle.
I used a long bed style side metal floor in place of a short bed flare side wood bed on my 81 F100. Not as bad as trying to fit wider frame under it but still not a "bolt on" at either end either.
Dave ----
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2018 | 08:59 PM
  #4  
swoosh1958's Avatar
swoosh1958
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Omaha,NE
FuzzFace2,I understand that the transfer case angle and the pinion angle should be the same or within a couple degrees. But a 20* shim? I see 4x4 pics all the time that I know the pinion angle can't be any where near correct.
As for all the weight on the truck,it is not sitting on the stands,it is on the ground. It is missing the fenders,steps,a couple bed supports and a floor.I would assume I weigh more than all of that. If I lean on the truck it moves maybe a 1/4" on the shackle. Manufacturer recommends to move the front hanger back 2" for proper angle on the shackle. And I know from the original 4" lift that a lift moves the axle forward. I can't determine where the axle goes until I figure out exactly what I am doing with the lift and hanger.
I used the flip rear hanger to take care of the body suspension problem. That is not really any problem right now. The pictures above show the interference with the suspension with the bed raised 2" off the frame. Now the bed is sitting on the frame with the flip blocks installed.
I guess what I am asking is:
Do people really use 20* shims
Is there an alternative to the lowest spring leaf. Can it be removed? Could I use a leaf spring from another truck that is 2" longer? Same arch as the stock spring just longer instead of moving the front hanger back? Maybe a different configuration. Like one that doesn't have the long flat piece on the bottom. I can just imagine backing up and spearing something with that leaf.
If I could move the bolt to the back hole on the hanger, looks like another 1.5". And get a three or four inch longer spring that might work the best and solve all of the body issues.Or move the front hanger back approximately 3.5". That may work also.
I was just hoping someone had gone through what I have and came up with the ideal configuration.
Thanks for your input Dave.
P.S. I have 4" springs up front.
 

Last edited by swoosh1958; Oct 30, 2018 at 09:02 PM. Reason: P.S.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2018 | 12:34 AM
  #5  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
33 1/2" between the inner frame rails behind the cab: 1961/72 F100/350; 1973/77 F250 4WD (High Boys); 1973/79 F350 Cab & Chassis and Regular Cabs on the 140" wheelbase.

37 1/2" between the inner frame rails behind the cab: 1973/79 F100 2WD/4WD; 1973/79 F250 2WD; 1975/79 F150 2WD/4WD; 1977/79 F250 4WD (not High Boys); 1973/79 F350's except as noted above.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2018 | 07:14 AM
  #6  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,915
Likes: 4,123
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
It almost sounds like the springs are made for something else if the front hanger should be moved back 2".
If you had the stock spring in and moving it back 2" changes the wheel base. If the rear hanger was changed why not move it so the shackles are right?

As for the "speer" I can't see why you couldn't remove it. When stock springs are used and you had a heavy load in the bed then they would flatten out to hit that bottom spring. I don't think you will have that heavy of a load so away it goes.
Now you may need to get a new center bolt as it maybe to long.

Do the springs have a front n back to them?
Some have the same eye bushing size but measure different from eye to center bolt front to back.
If the spring was installed backwards that may throw off the angle of the pinion.
If the rear hanger was stock does that put it at a better angle?
Did you want the lift and flip kit or had to to clear the bed?
For me it is hard to picture in my small head what all is going on with the springs, lift, flip kit and body to suspension deal to give muchore info.
Dave - - - -
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2018 | 09:51 AM
  #7  
skyhawc's Avatar
skyhawc
Tuned
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 357
Likes: 11
From: Roanoke, VA
What vehicle was the lift designed for? As Dave said, you can't get accurate measurements (pinion angle, shackle angles) without the expected weight on the rear suspension.

My recommendations with a custom build such as this to cut off the factory spring perches from the axles, order a new set, and set pinion angle correctly without the need of wedges. You can fine tune it to perfection based of your amount of lift, driveshaft style (as a shaft with single u-joints on each side requires different settings than one with a double cardan joint at the trans/tcase)

If I remember correctly when I did the lift on my 78, the centering pin is offset on the springs, so if you have them backwards it will alter your wheelbase approximately 1-2".
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2018 | 06:30 PM
  #8  
swoosh1958's Avatar
swoosh1958
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Omaha,NE
My original lift kit was supposedly made for my truck.Smaller end of the spring goes forward.Since I need that flipped hanger to get body clearance, I think I will go back to stock springs. Then see what I have to do. The new mounts sound like a good idea.Thanks
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rezza56
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
Jul 9, 2018 10:20 PM
jonf
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
Aug 20, 2014 04:52 PM
whiteisright
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
16
Apr 29, 2012 05:04 PM
dentsideranger
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
Aug 4, 2008 04:22 PM
rebocardo
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
1
Jul 8, 2004 11:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE