Any ideas for a 2 barrel intake for a 390?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-02-2018, 11:06 AM
landono's Avatar
landono
landono is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any ideas for a 2 barrel intake for a 390?

I had a brainstorm about a torquey intake when I saw some single barrel carbs for sale. Is there any good options for mounting a couple of those YFA carters onto a 390? I'm planning on the motor living in the idle to 3500 rpm range. I have a stock 2barrel intake on now and will prolly end up with a 2100 on there.

It just seemed fun to wonder ...
 
  #2  
Old 10-02-2018, 11:24 AM
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
ford390gashog is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brentwood,CA
Posts: 26,006
Received 521 Likes on 400 Posts
A YFA carb isn't a good choice on a FE. The requirement of idle to 3500 rom isn't really good either. At that range you are not in the powerband, what cam are you going to use? I could see idle to 4500 rpm or 1500rpm- 6500rpm but not the requirement you have mentioned.

 
  #3  
Old 10-02-2018, 07:44 PM
landono's Avatar
landono
landono is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes I saw the Edelbrock performer claiming idle to 5500. But realistically I wasn't planning on using anything over 4000. I'm looking for torque. My newer diesel pickups spoiled me. I wanted to stay in the two barrel low rpm torque range. I saw those carter YFA's and thought it'd be really cool to start with one of those and when floored the secondary would open up. So WOT would be 2 single carbs.

It's a pickup, not really the place for one of those 8 pack setups. Well maybe, but I can't afford that right now. And the motor wouldn't be ready for it.
 
  #4  
Old 10-02-2018, 08:43 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,962
Received 1,636 Likes on 1,334 Posts
We had a 390 2v in the '66 wagon. Pretty sure that was done by 4500, may never have gone over 4100.

For what you are doing, the stock 2bbl manifold and the Autolite 2bbl is about as good as it's going to get. Simple, reliable, safe.

You can get the tiniest one off a Falcon or some other mini-mobile with a 260 or 289. At the top of this forum it explains CFM and code/venture size cast into the carb. Get a .98 for it, you'll have your 3500 rpm limit.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...eral-info.html
 
  #5  
Old 10-03-2018, 10:40 AM
landono's Avatar
landono
landono is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess I'm rather looking for low rpm torque. Rather than finding some handmade single barrel intake. Are the .98 throated 2100s going to be best for that?
If I do use the Edel performer 4v intake, would I get better tq numbers from a edelbrock 1403 500cfm with a heavy spring delaying the secondaries? Or an adapter plate allowing an autolite 2100?
 
  #6  
Old 10-03-2018, 05:28 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,962
Received 1,636 Likes on 1,334 Posts
What you want is the cylinders filled as full as possible at low rpms. So you need a balance between venturi size and intake velocity. Too small on the carb, you add pumping losses and don't allow enough air/fuel into the motor. Too large, lower velocity at low engine speeds, and thus the cylinders aren't filled.

You get a nice amount of torque here because of the size of the engine. Up to a point, the smaller carb will still give you that, but power will drop off earlier. Properly tuned, the other combinations will also result in low rpm torque, and allow more power at higher revs.

Serving suggestion: Use the 2bbl manifold and find a .98 to 1.08 carb and run it. If you like it, bingo. If not, try something else. Unless you have a dyno under controlled conditions, you aren't really going to be able to pin it down.

Again, don't try to reinvent the wheel. The stock 2bbl manifold and Autolite carbs fit, are safe if properly assembled and installed, and are reliable.

Read through this. Short version, the larger the motor, the more torque.

https://www.hotrod.com/articles/hrdp...sepower-guide/

It's all about filling the cylinders. That's why a lot of turbo motors make and hold their peak torque at 1500 rpm, or some other fairly low number compared to NA motors.
 
  #7  
Old 10-05-2018, 11:12 AM
landono's Avatar
landono
landono is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks, I'll do some more reading.
 
  #8  
Old 10-06-2018, 03:22 AM
SoCal69's Avatar
SoCal69
SoCal69 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 332
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
carb cfm

I'm still learning about the 390 I had my 69 F250 running for only a few months now after rebuilt everything , it has the stock 2bbl intake on it the previous owner had a 4412 Holly with a 1" spacer it was completely stock at rebuild i added a comp 265/275 dual energy Cam that's as big as I could go with stock heads according to the rebuild shop .
Just installed Patriot H 8046 headers I replaced the older version of the 4412 with the newer one 2017 it's a monster burns the tires , a little off topic but I never had a 2100 or a motorcraft don't know how it would compare to the 4412 I also have a 350Holly 7448 I wanted to try I know it's not a hot Rod but can't help letting her rip ....
 
  #9  
Old 10-09-2018, 12:01 PM
landono's Avatar
landono
landono is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I looked up numbers, it seemed you might've meant 8406 headers. But that seems like a slick set.
 
  #10  
Old 10-09-2018, 11:25 PM
SoCal69's Avatar
SoCal69
SoCal69 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 332
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
there sick .......

Originally Posted by landono
When I looked up numbers, it seemed you might've meant 8406 headers. But that seems like a slick set.
H8406 ....H8406-1 are ceramic coated well worth it my engine bay is way cooler than those cast iron logs yeah there pretty sick for the money I'm Happy with them ..

 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jav409
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
1
12-29-2005 10:06 PM
dj53
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
12
11-23-2005 08:25 PM
Madmike33
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
9
11-02-2004 04:47 PM
morganburger
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
13
08-26-2003 11:49 AM
77ford
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
04-04-2001 11:55 PM



Quick Reply: Any ideas for a 2 barrel intake for a 390?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 AM.