7.0 is coming
#376
#377
Originally Posted by ford5.8
7.3 445ci pushrod engine, 2V aluminum heads with 2.2" intake valves, direct injected. Will be in 2020 model yr F-Series.
And my "sources" have said all along it's plan was 7.3L and definitely a pushrod motor.
I can't disclose mine due to confidentiality reasons. Patiently awaiting it to keep leaking out. What I haven't heard in certainty is platforms it will be powering.
#378
Really puts me in a dilemma. I'll be coming back to the States sometime in the first half of next year and I need a new truck (it will be a gasser and 99% sure it will be a Ford) to tow our travel trailer, etc. Assuming this new motor is going into the 250/350 platform, I would love to take advantage of the better capabilities, but would also likely have to wait several months for it to arrive in the 2020 models.
However, the 6.2 is tried and true, would be immediately available, and will not have any first-year teething issues.
What to do, what to do.
However, the 6.2 is tried and true, would be immediately available, and will not have any first-year teething issues.
What to do, what to do.
#379
Details are SLOWLY leaking out at a glacial pace:
https://www.svtperformance.com/forum...-name.1162603/
Rumor is the kids over at GM are finally going to be ditching the 6.0 in the HD line.
2020 GM Heavy-Duty Pickups: Spied - PickupTrucks.com News
Read about a possible GM 7.0 seems like 5 years ago...good news as that means the future 7.3 is more likely needed across the line for competitive reasons.
https://www.svtperformance.com/forum...-name.1162603/
Rumor is the kids over at GM are finally going to be ditching the 6.0 in the HD line.
2020 GM Heavy-Duty Pickups: Spied - PickupTrucks.com News
Read about a possible GM 7.0 seems like 5 years ago...good news as that means the future 7.3 is more likely needed across the line for competitive reasons.
#380
It's been covered before, but the GM 6.2 L86 is not a HD truck engine; it's an aluminum block and head design. Not good for everyday extended heavy use.
#384
I thought the were still going to sale the mustang and focus in North America. But I agree, the entire purpose of stopping production of cars was to focus on trucks and suvs, which are selling better and are more profitable. Doesn't make since for them to delay any truck investments because they are ending car production. That would be stepping over a dollar to toss away a penny.
#385
https://www.tfltruck.com/2018/09/rum...rd-super-duty/
I'm not sure if this is truly a "confirmed" rumor. Seems like more of a continued rumor. But thought I'd share anyway.
I'm not sure if this is truly a "confirmed" rumor. Seems like more of a continued rumor. But thought I'd share anyway.
#386
https://www.tfltruck.com/2018/09/rum...rd-super-duty/
I'm not sure if this is truly a "confirmed" rumor. Seems like more of a continued rumor. But thought I'd share anyway.
I'm not sure if this is truly a "confirmed" rumor. Seems like more of a continued rumor. But thought I'd share anyway.
#387
So they are going backwards and going to pushrod engine. In other words they went with cheap to try and offset the price of the DI components. Not surprised really considering the direction Ford has been going. I have been seeing the quality of the components declining a lot over the last 20 years, especially in the powertrain and body. Build the powertrain and structure as cheap as possible and put the money into half a dozen trim levels, myriads of pretty much useless gadgets and a bunch of nanny systems so the driver can keep more attention to the gadgets rather than driving.
#388
So they are going backwards and going to pushrod engine. In other words they went with cheap to try and offset the price of the DI components. Not surprised really considering the direction Ford has been going. I have been seeing the quality of the components declining a lot over the last 20 years, especially in the powertrain and body. Build the powertrain and structure as cheap as possible and put the money into half a dozen trim levels, myriads of pretty much useless gadgets and a bunch of nanny systems so the driver can keep more attention to the gadgets rather than driving.
As far as overhead cam to pushrods I'm wondering if it's because of the engine foot print, overhead cams take a lot more room under the hood.
Denny
#389
So they are going backwards and going to pushrod engine. In other words they went with cheap to try and offset the price of the DI components. Not surprised really considering the direction Ford has been going. I have been seeing the quality of the components declining a lot over the last 20 years, especially in the powertrain and body. Build the powertrain and structure as cheap as possible and put the money into half a dozen trim levels, myriads of pretty much useless gadgets and a bunch of nanny systems so the driver can keep more attention to the gadgets rather than driving.
#390
I will have to disagree with you on that, when I get into my 03 F150 and then back into my 13 F350 the newer truck has way better quality, same with my 00 F350 to my 13 F350. I also love all my gadgets, sure makes long trips more enjoyable.
As far as overhead cam to pushrods I'm wondering if it's because of the engine foot print, overhead cams take a lot more room under the hood.
Denny
As far as overhead cam to pushrods I'm wondering if it's because of the engine foot print, overhead cams take a lot more room under the hood.
Denny
The 6.7l diesel takes up far more room than even a DOHC 7.3l V8 under the hood. The 7.3l OHV is cheaper to make than a SOHC or DOHC, Ford like cheap. Surprised they don't get it made in China.