7.3L / 6.8L V8 Gasoline Engines Discuss the new 7.3 and 6.8L Gasoline V8s

7.0 is coming

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #406  
Old 02-05-2019, 10:12 AM
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Chuck's First Ford is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: very South Texas
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
the news reports the "XL" will be 6.2 with a 6 speed...only.

< First year production.. is final prototype testing >
 
  #407  
Old 02-05-2019, 12:31 PM
Ron94150's Avatar
Ron94150
Ron94150 is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 3,146
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
  #408  
Old 02-05-2019, 01:47 PM
Dwightdr's Avatar
Dwightdr
Dwightdr is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 104
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn, and I just ordered my 6.2 with 4.30 beginning of Jan.
 
  #409  
Old 02-05-2019, 03:11 PM
kry226's Avatar
kry226
kry226 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,572
Received 386 Likes on 215 Posts
Originally Posted by Dwightdr
Damn, and I just ordered my 6.2 with 4.30 beginning of Jan.
Me too, and not one regret either.
 
  #410  
Old 02-05-2019, 04:43 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
What a cheapo engine, surprised they didn't put a plastic oil pan on it too. Looks like I have bought my last new truck.
 
  #411  
Old 02-05-2019, 05:02 PM
Dwightdr's Avatar
Dwightdr
Dwightdr is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 104
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dkf
What a cheapo engine, surprised they didn't put a plastic oil pan on it too. Looks like I have bought my last new truck.
Why, just curious?
 
  #412  
Old 02-05-2019, 06:37 PM
llmflyfisher's Avatar
llmflyfisher
llmflyfisher is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Corpus Christi TX
Posts: 452
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Maybe a little premature to judge the new engine yet? Damned thing not even out in the wild yet and no has driven one to report on it. Might be a really good engine.
Only problem now is anyone wanting to buy a truck has to decide to either be a guinea pig with a new drivetrain, or go with tried and true and be happy with that even if others are just gushing about the new engine / transmission etc.
Not an easy decision. I am not totally thrilled with the new grille. Not a big deal.
 
  #413  
Old 02-05-2019, 07:33 PM
ATP Pilot's Avatar
ATP Pilot
ATP Pilot is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 566
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Had a 6.2...not enough for me....I love my Cummins 6.7...but the 7.3 might be my next one....in a few years once it is proven

Nice job Ford
 
  #414  
Old 02-05-2019, 07:47 PM
Alaskan_Warbird's Avatar
Alaskan_Warbird
Alaskan_Warbird is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 1,962
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Chuck's First Ford
Winner, Winner...

the return of the 1950's..
I hope it has hydro roller lifters.. roller rockers. roller tips. carbon fiber push rods.
it does not matter to me.. my F 250 will last me. till I die.
interesting intake system.. I wonder if its the short/long runner system.. like the late 80's Acura v6...
#metoo! I'll likely be in my current truck for a few more years - long enough for them to iron out any bugs. But man does that 7.3L look sexy. Can't wait to see it's numbers.
 
  #415  
Old 02-05-2019, 08:39 PM
stephen.osborne1's Avatar
stephen.osborne1
stephen.osborne1 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Idaho
Posts: 2,350
Received 178 Likes on 126 Posts
Surprised they went back to an OHV design. Wonder why? I'm pretty happy with the 6.2 in my Rappy...
 
  #416  
Old 02-05-2019, 11:12 PM
someday's Avatar
someday
someday is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
DOHC are big, complex, and wide. OHV are simpler and easier to work on. if you ever had to mess with DOHC timing chains its a PITA. in a few years i can see ford adding DI for more power!

lastly, where is the 7.3l godzilla gasser forum?!

@17CCLB250

"Well, most prominently, the 6.0 gas engine in the Chevy HDs. There is a reason it's been the gasser motor for high duty cycle trucks for the last 17+ years. Adequate power, hilariously cheap to maintain, and will run nearly until the second coming. It is a great work truck motor, probably one of the best truck motors of all time. Less predominantly, the 5.7 and 6.4 Hemi, as well as the Ford 6.7 Diesel are also pushrod engine designs.

The benefit of the large displacement/pushrod design is it's easier to make power lower in the RPM band. You might be gimped a bit on total power output, but with proper gearing and transmission programming, it doesn't matter when you get a nice flat torque curve.

Outside of the HD territory, virtually every single hot rod on the planet runs a pushrod GM LS. The 6.2L in the GM half tons are pushrod. You'll probably hear a lot of people on here go on and on about the Ford 5.0 Coyote making it's way into the resto/racing scene, but for every 5.0 crate motor Ford sells, GM sells 1000 LS motors. And that isn't by mistake - cheap, easy, maintainable power. Nowadays they even get pretty decent gas mileage. Heck, a 700+ HP Corvette (pushrod) will give you 25-30 mpg if you keep your foot out of the loud pedal.

The truth is, since the 90s (with the exception of the last of the 460 big blocks), Ford makes revving (gas) motors. They are generally lacking on the low-rpm range, but they will be happy winding out to 6000 RPM all day long. That's just they way it is, and it isn't necessarily a better/worse approach. I LOVE the 6.2 in my truck. With the right gearing and a decent trans program in the 6R100, the truck doesn't feel sluggish at all. BUT getting a stump puller big block like the 7.3 hopefully will be would also be awesome. In summary, pushrods are great, they are in probably 98% of all trucks on the road, and the idea of moving away from the excellent and dependable 6.2 platform in the SuperDuties to a tried and true tractor motor philosophy with the 7.3 doesn't concern me at all."
 
  #417  
Old 02-06-2019, 04:01 AM
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Chuck's First Ford is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: very South Texas
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
the F53 groups should be happy..

I am OK with push-rod... been fixing them for 50 years. and YES, I was a Chevy mechanic.
many DISLIKE high rpm's. at all costs. but also dislikes diesel..

I see no one has paid any notice to the intake manifold.. throttle body is below/under... high arch long runners.
 
  #418  
Old 02-06-2019, 06:26 AM
ssls6's Avatar
ssls6
ssls6 is online now
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Park County, CO
Posts: 471
Received 114 Likes on 60 Posts
I commend Ford for the new power plant. If you want high work output and long life, you need displacement and simplicity.
 
  #419  
Old 02-06-2019, 07:20 AM
rvpuller's Avatar
rvpuller
rvpuller is online now
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Home Base Nebraska
Posts: 6,050
Received 443 Likes on 288 Posts
A 7.3 forum is in the making

Denny
 
  #420  
Old 02-06-2019, 08:36 AM
someday's Avatar
someday
someday is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
is the 6.2l block from the same 5.4 and 6.8l family?
 


Quick Reply: 7.0 is coming



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 PM.