Notices

Solid Lifter For Pushrod Measurement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2017 | 07:02 PM
  #1  
old28's Avatar
old28
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 29
From: Southern CA
Solid Lifter For Pushrod Measurement

Is it OK to use a solid lifter in place of the Hydraulic Lifter to get proper pushrod measurement with the Comp Cam pushrod checker?

How much would you add for preload measurement?
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2017 | 10:03 AM
  #2  
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,987
Likes: 104
From: Boise, Idaho
Club FTE Gold Member
When I did my engine last year, my machinist said the only way to properly do it was with a solid lifter in place of the hydraulic, since it simulates the measurement of a fully pumped up lifter.

I had one solid lifter and went down the valve train one by one and measured each push rod individually. (I ended up with 3 different lengths for what it's worth).

Cover the tip of the valve stem with a dry erase marker. Install the solid lifter. Install the pushrod length checker. Install the rocker arm and tighten it down just until there's zero lash. (Unlike a hydraulic, it'll be instant, so go slow). Then, roll the engine over a few times and remove the rocker. If the wear line is out toward the edge of the valve stem away from the pushrod, shorten the length checker. If it's toward the edge on the side of the pushrod, lengthen it. Repeat until the wear mark is within the center 3rd.



Do not take any preload into account when measuring. That's done when you adjust the valves after it's all said and done.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2017 | 11:06 AM
  #3  
The Frenchtown Flyer's Avatar
The Frenchtown Flyer
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 69
Why would your machinist want to simulate a "fully pumped up lifter" at the end of its travel? He must not understand that the way a hydraulic works is to have the pushrod / lifter plunger located somewhere in the middle of its travel in the lifter bore.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2017 | 11:12 AM
  #4  
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,987
Likes: 104
From: Boise, Idaho
Club FTE Gold Member
I just meant one that's pumped up, which is something you can't easily do with a hydraulic lifter when the engine isn't running. A solid lifter is set so that it's in that range that a hydraulic lifter would be when it's running, just without the cushion of oil.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2017 | 11:55 AM
  #5  
The Frenchtown Flyer's Avatar
The Frenchtown Flyer
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 69
I did not know that. I never measured the difference between the two. Thanks for enlightening me.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2017 | 06:00 PM
  #6  
old28's Avatar
old28
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 29
From: Southern CA
So do I hear this correct that if I use a solid lifter with my pushrod checker I do not add any preload to the pushrod measurement?
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2017 | 06:11 PM
  #7  
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,987
Likes: 104
From: Boise, Idaho
Club FTE Gold Member
I suppose you could, but it'd be a small amount.

I didn't on mine and I used roller rocker arms which require more precision than stamped steel.
After running them for a couple thousand miles, the wear mark on the valve stem is right in the middle.

If you were to do so, add around 0.050".

However, when I was measuring my push rods, I had to make changes of around 0.100" or so to really see any change in where the rocker tip was riding, so 0.050" isn't going to make a lot of difference.
Maybe if you were working on a race motor that saw 8000 RPMs or something, you'd want it to be that perfect.
 
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2017 | 06:47 PM
  #8  
old28's Avatar
old28
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 29
From: Southern CA
AB -- Thanks for the reply. I am going to run 1.7 roller rockers on this build, max RPM will be around 5700. I will do the same .050 & .100 check on my unit to see what the roller/valve tip pattern looks like.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-3

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
Old Dec 2, 2017 | 10:15 AM
  #9  
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,987
Likes: 104
From: Boise, Idaho
Club FTE Gold Member
That sounds like a good plan.

I'm really happy with the roller rockers on mine. I know it's built to go to around 5500 - 6000 RPMs, but I just haven't gotten myself to go over 5k yet.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BroncoBilli
Performance & General Engine Building
4
Dec 17, 2017 04:18 PM
73 fourxfour
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
38
Feb 20, 2011 02:55 PM
OldFordRacer
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
3
Apr 22, 2008 12:39 AM
Mud_Hunter
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
3
May 16, 2004 06:40 PM
Sedric
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
Dec 30, 2002 01:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.

story-0
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-2
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE