1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

Looking at a different clutch linkage, what do you recommend?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-28-2017, 12:28 AM
lvin4jc's Avatar
lvin4jc
lvin4jc is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rapid City, SoDak
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Looking at a different clutch linkage, what do you recommend?

I'm putting a different engine in my '69 f100. The new engine has a different boss on the block where the Z-bar clutch linkage would go. My linkage is very worn out anyway and with the new engine i'll need more room for exhaust on that side.

For those of you that have done a swap or just upgraded your clutch linkage, what did you go with, cable, hydraulic, other?

I have the 4 speed T-18 if that makes a difference.

Thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 10-28-2017, 09:18 AM
kenny nunez's Avatar
kenny nunez
kenny nunez is online now
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Kenner,La.
Posts: 1,886
Received 172 Likes on 133 Posts
Question Clutch linkage

Which engine are you installing ?
 
  #3  
Old 10-28-2017, 09:23 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 651 Likes on 546 Posts
Originally Posted by lvin4jc
I'm putting a different engine in my '69 f100.

The new engine has a different boss on the block where the Z-bar clutch linkage would go.
The clutch equalizer (Z) bar (7528 in pic) has nothing to do with the engine block.

 
  #4  
Old 10-28-2017, 12:08 PM
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
ultraranger is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Camden, Arkansas
Posts: 6,398
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
I only know of three clutch actuation types; mechanical linkage, cable or hydraulic.

The old mechanical linkages are a 'push' type setup --pushes the end of the clutch fork rearward. The cable setup is a 'pull' system --pulls the end of the clutch fork towards the front of the vehicle. Hydraulic could be either push or pull, depending on how the slave cylinder is mounted and how the clutch fork pivot is configured.--if it's a hydraulic throw out bearing, there won't be a clutch fork.

The pivot fulcrum for the clutch fork will be mounted to the bellhousing to the left side of the transmission input shaft, on a push type setup. On a pull type setup, the clutch fork fulcrum will be mounted to the right side of the transmission input shaft.

A pull type setup would require a different clutch fork that's longer. I don't know if such a thing exists for a T-18 transmission (?).

I'm not clear if your linkage rods are worn out, if the Z-bar is worn out or, both?

Whatever the case, you can make a new Z-bar and/or linkages, that are much improved, as I'm doing here.









I still have to cut and thread the linkage rods to the proper lengths but, you get the general idea of what's going on here.



 
  #5  
Old 10-28-2017, 12:26 PM
mrpotatohead's Avatar
mrpotatohead
mrpotatohead is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NAMPA, ID.
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Stay with the factory setup friend, it will simplify your life. Think about it; the original design lasted 50 years plus.
 
  #6  
Old 10-28-2017, 12:56 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 651 Likes on 546 Posts
The nylon clutch equalizer (z) bar nylon bushings (C1AA-7543-A) are available from Ford and all the repro parts sellers.

The weak point in the clutch linkage is the long clutch release rod and its (2) associated nylon bushings (C0AZ-7526-A - reproduced).

The rod has 90 degree ends, attaches to the clutch pedal bell crank, then routes thru the toe board to the clutch equalizer bar.

The bushings crack apart/disintegrate, the 90 degree ends begin to crack, eventually break off.

The clutch pedal drops to the floor, lays there like a drunken sailor. Not pleasant!
 
  #7  
Old 10-28-2017, 04:13 PM
kenny nunez's Avatar
kenny nunez
kenny nunez is online now
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Kenner,La.
Posts: 1,886
Received 172 Likes on 133 Posts
Clutch linkage

Wilwood makes a hydraulic slave that pulls. It only takes material to be 1/3 rd as strong to pull rather than push. I have a set up in my 67 XL that pulls the clutch cable. So far 30k miles and no problems. I am using the stock Mustang clutch cable and a spare in the trunk just in case. The Wilwood set up has 1.5” of travel for the master cylinder and slave.
 
  #8  
Old 10-29-2017, 01:06 AM
lvin4jc's Avatar
lvin4jc
lvin4jc is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rapid City, SoDak
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
The clutch equalizer (Z) bar (7528 in pic) has nothing to do with the engine block.

Part# 7A535 above is screwed into a boss in the block on my 240. It looks like that "Boss" is much larger on the 1969 240 block than the 1978 351W block. Suggestions?
 
  #9  
Old 10-29-2017, 01:10 AM
lvin4jc's Avatar
lvin4jc
lvin4jc is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rapid City, SoDak
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mrpotatohead
Stay with the factory setup friend, it will simplify your life. Think about it; the original design lasted 50 years plus.
I'm not against keeping the Z-bar. But since this truck had a 6cyl (single exhaust on pass. side) I'm not sure where the driver's side exhaust would go. I know that plenty of these trucks had V8's, does anyone have a picture of how the V8 exhaust routes around the steering box and Z-bar linkage?
 
  #10  
Old 10-29-2017, 10:02 AM
kenny nunez's Avatar
kenny nunez
kenny nunez is online now
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Kenner,La.
Posts: 1,886
Received 172 Likes on 133 Posts
Clutch linkage

I had a 460 with a wide ratio top loader in my 68 using stock manifolds with the original clutch linkage from the original 360. I had to fabricate a bracket for the engine side to support the Z bar. I still have the whole set up including the bell housing in the attic if anyone needs it.
 
  #11  
Old 10-29-2017, 12:09 PM
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FuzzFace2 is online now
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Angier, NC
Posts: 23,828
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,838 Posts
Originally Posted by lvin4jc
Part# 7A535 above is screwed into a boss in the block on my 240. It looks like that "Boss" is much larger on the 1969 240 block than the 1978 351W block. Suggestions?
It sounds like you need the block side of the Z bar pivot for the 78 351 and hope the bushing for it or your z bar bushing will play nice.

Originally Posted by kenny nunez
I had a 460 with a wide ratio top loader in my 68 using stock manifolds with the original clutch linkage from the original 360. I had to fabricate a bracket for the engine side to support the Z bar. I still have the whole set up including the bell housing in the attic if anyone needs it.
OR make a bracket to hold your 240 motor side pivot.


Are you sure the z bar frame side pivot bracket & the 351 motor side pivot are across from each other.
Dave ----
 
  #12  
Old 10-29-2017, 12:34 PM
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
ultraranger is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Camden, Arkansas
Posts: 6,398
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
The engine side Z-bar pivot on the 240/300 has a 9/16"-12 thread on one end and a 5/8" diameter pin on the other end.
 
  #13  
Old 10-29-2017, 01:57 PM
lvin4jc's Avatar
lvin4jc
lvin4jc is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rapid City, SoDak
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FuzzFace2
It sounds like you need the block side of the Z bar pivot for the 78 351 and hope the bushing for it or your z bar bushing will play nice.

OR make a bracket to hold your 240 motor side pivot.


Are you sure the z bar frame side pivot bracket & the 351 motor side pivot are across from each other.
Dave ----

Would this work? - 1965-1973 Shift Mounting Plate Kit - Cal Pony Cars


All helpful responses guys, I really appreciate it!
 
  #14  
Old 10-29-2017, 03:41 PM
lvin4jc's Avatar
lvin4jc
lvin4jc is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rapid City, SoDak
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FuzzFace2
Are you sure the z bar frame side pivot bracket & the 351 motor side pivot are across from each other.
Dave ----
I'm not sure of that. The "boss" looks to be in the same position on both blocks but I have not set the new engine down in the truck yet to verify that.

Any idea how to look up "block side of the Z bar pivot for the 78 351?" What would that be called and who would have it?
 
  #15  
Old 10-29-2017, 05:59 PM
RichS2659's Avatar
RichS2659
RichS2659 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 152 Likes on 132 Posts
It looks like the 7A535 boss is the same for both Six and 302 use. As the 351W is a Windsor and should be the same as a 302. I would pull it off your 240, and check it against the 351W thread size on the block. As the 351W was not used in trucks, but cars and vans, I would look for a van one and check the size of the Z-bar female end.
 


Quick Reply: Looking at a different clutch linkage, what do you recommend?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 PM.