1946 or 48?
#1
1946 or 48?
Hello guys, I am new to the site. I have what was believed to be a 1946 F5 ratrod truck. I recently wanted to convert to disc brakes but after further review im learning the F5 didn't come out till 48. the front half of the truck is stock framed other than being air bagged. it is a 6 lug which leads to believe it really is an F5. i cant find a disc brake conversion kit for the F5 so i was wondering if the spindles are the same from an F3 (5 LUG) so i can go that route? any help in identifying?
#3
You've got a cab from a '48-'50 F-5 plopped on - who knows what! The frame and front axle didn't come from a '48-'50 Ford. If it had, it would have 5 lugs instead of 6 on the wheels and the frame wouldn't have that pronounced sag to the ground forward of the firewall. The front frame section would be essentially straight.
#4
You've got a cab from a '48-'50 F-5 plopped on - who knows what! The frame and front axle didn't come from a '48-'50 Ford. If it had, it would have 5 lugs instead of 6 on the wheels and the frame wouldn't have that pronounced sag to the ground forward of the firewall. The front frame section would be essentially straight.
I figured that's what was going to be the outcome. I bought this as a project and am trying to figure out what the heck is going on here. im lost now.
#5
#6
I commented on this guy's posting on the 47 and under forum. Here's my comments. Stu
Trucks like this are hard to sort out. I see an F-5 badge on the door hinge panel, and, unless I'm seeing wrong, the cab looks to have a big back window signifying a 51/52 cab donor. (Edit - maybe it is 48-50, I'm changing my mind.). You might post more pics. The frame is anybody's guess. There is nothing I see that is Ford F-3. That would have 8 lug hubs rather than 5 lug.
What I am comfortable saying is that the 6 lug x 7.25" pattern tubeless wheels came from either a Ford F-350, 1956 to 1966, or similar Dodge or Studebaker. The fronts having six hand holes are Budd 71320s while the rears having three hand holes are Budd 79120s. They are 17.5" x 5.25", and appear to have metric radial tires that look too wide for the rims. The truck that donated the wheels probably also donated the front axle and hub components. I see a number on the backing plate in one picture that follows no Ford numbering sequence, and no Studebaker sequence that I've encountered. Might it be Dodge? I know that a member of the Studebaker Truck Talk forum has been attempting to engineer a disc brake system for their 6 x 7.25" bolt pattern hubs, but have seen nothing recently to show he's making progress on that. Stu
Trucks like this are hard to sort out. I see an F-5 badge on the door hinge panel, and, unless I'm seeing wrong, the cab looks to have a big back window signifying a 51/52 cab donor. (Edit - maybe it is 48-50, I'm changing my mind.). You might post more pics. The frame is anybody's guess. There is nothing I see that is Ford F-3. That would have 8 lug hubs rather than 5 lug.
What I am comfortable saying is that the 6 lug x 7.25" pattern tubeless wheels came from either a Ford F-350, 1956 to 1966, or similar Dodge or Studebaker. The fronts having six hand holes are Budd 71320s while the rears having three hand holes are Budd 79120s. They are 17.5" x 5.25", and appear to have metric radial tires that look too wide for the rims. The truck that donated the wheels probably also donated the front axle and hub components. I see a number on the backing plate in one picture that follows no Ford numbering sequence, and no Studebaker sequence that I've encountered. Might it be Dodge? I know that a member of the Studebaker Truck Talk forum has been attempting to engineer a disc brake system for their 6 x 7.25" bolt pattern hubs, but have seen nothing recently to show he's making progress on that. Stu
#7
Welcome to the forum! You have your work cut out for you!
I see a couple of things that seem to be worth investigating.
Is this rod end really seated fully?
This is not what I'd expect for a kingpin locking pin. It could be like this on the bigger trucks, but I doubt it.
This kingpin is way down in the spindle, that doesn't look right... Maybe the spindles were adapted to a bigger axle? Both brake hoses appear to have almost no slack to accommodate turns.
I see a couple of things that seem to be worth investigating.
Is this rod end really seated fully?
This is not what I'd expect for a kingpin locking pin. It could be like this on the bigger trucks, but I doubt it.
This kingpin is way down in the spindle, that doesn't look right... Maybe the spindles were adapted to a bigger axle? Both brake hoses appear to have almost no slack to accommodate turns.
Trending Topics
#8
#10
Hello guys, I am new to the site. I have what was believed to be a 1946 F5 ratrod truck.
I recently wanted to convert to disc brakes but after further review im learning the F5 didn't come out till 48.
F1 thru F8 introduced in 1948. Prior years did not use the F designation.
It is a 6 lug which leads to believe it really is an F5.
No F5 has 6 lug wheels.
I recently wanted to convert to disc brakes but after further review im learning the F5 didn't come out till 48.
F1 thru F8 introduced in 1948. Prior years did not use the F designation.
It is a 6 lug which leads to believe it really is an F5.
No F5 has 6 lug wheels.
Some 1954/56 F600's have 5 lug wheels on 8.00" bolt circle, some have 6 lug wheels on a 8.75" bolt circle.
1953/66 F350 & P350 (P Series Parcel Delivery) have 6 lug wheels on a 7.25" bolt circle.
1953/66 F350 & P350 have 13" x 2 1/2" rear brakes. 1956/66 F350 & P350 have 12 1/8" x 2" front brakes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1956f3504x4
1947 and Older Ford Trucks
18
08-24-2019 09:26 PM
Ancient Iron
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
28
10-25-2014 06:54 AM