Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

osc 561 radiator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2017 | 06:00 PM
  #1  
john carroll's Avatar
john carroll
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
osc 561 radiator

I'm searching for an affordable radiator for an 83 f150 with a 302. Nothing radical done with the motor. Redone E7TE heads, cam don't have much more than stock lift, 4bbl carb, 3 speed + OD toploader 4X4.

I'm eyeballing this OSC 561 on amazon right now for 92$. It matches core width and height. It also says 3 row "EQUIVALENT". What does the equivalent part mean? Maybe not really 3 rows, but rather equal in thickness with thicker tubes than a single row?

Also, not sure if I can trust an amazon seller selling a radiator for 92$ when summit wants 250ish for the same thing.

What are your thoughts?
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2017 | 09:46 PM
  #2  
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,171
Likes: 1,173
Originally Posted by john carroll
I'm eyeballing this OSC 561 on amazon right now for 92$. It matches core width and height. It also says 3 row "EQUIVALENT". What does the equivalent part mean? Maybe not really 3 rows, but rather equal in thickness with thicker tubes than a single row?

Also, not sure if I can trust an amazon seller selling a radiator for 92$ when summit wants 250ish for the same thing.
I remember seeing that radiator when searching for one for my '84. I eventually decided against it because it appears to have plastic side tanks. It's not super obvious from the description on Amazon. The only clue there is the mention of a "die cut gasket", which you wouldn't need with welded or brazed construction. Other vendors selling the same product had more pictures. Unless those were generic representations, they did show plastic side tanks.

I've had several vehicles equipped with plastic side tanks and have had exactly zero problems with them. Given my druthers, though, I just prefer the more traditional construction for durability. The choice is yours. Perhaps you could contact the seller (a third-party seller using Amazon) and check with them to be positive about the construction. Also ask about the return policy in case it doesn't fit or looks to be poorly constructed. Amazon has excellent customer service in case there's a problem, but definitely find out ahead of time what is and isn't covered with third-party returns.

My radiator saga here, including the medium-priced full-aluminum model I purchased. Despite a minor fitment issue, I am very pleased with it.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...lant-leak.html

As far as the "3-row equivalent", I suspect that is a marketing thing. The specs say the core is an industry standard 26mm thick, just a whisker over an inch. It must be a very efficient inch if the equivalent of 3 rows. Maybe it's like how heavy-duty tires have ply ratings for the load carrying ability. Years ago, a 10 ply rated tire actually had 10 plies. Nowadays a modern tire might only have 3 or 4 hi-tech plies (strictly guessing on the exact number) but still meet the standards for 10 old-fashioned plies.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2017 | 06:00 AM
  #3  
CountryBumkin's Avatar
CountryBumkin
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 5
From: Orlando area
3 row "equivalent" means it's not 3 row. Whether or not having a 3 row is important, is up to you. I would just buy locally (from Napa, O'Reilly, etc.) where you see the product before you buy.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2017 | 06:48 AM
  #4  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,980
Likes: 2,735
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
That is awfully cheap. Rockauto has the same exact part number for $194.79
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Padilla Shore
1947 and Older Ford Trucks
8
Mar 23, 2018 08:00 AM
yellow truck
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
11
Sep 17, 2015 12:32 PM
Radster
Cooling, Heating, Ventilation & A/C
3
Dec 17, 2014 09:05 AM
Whiplaunch
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Aug 19, 2014 11:54 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE