Notices
2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Control placement standards

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2017 | 10:52 PM
  #16  
miner999r's Avatar
miner999r
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 6
From: Alberta
aviation industry solved this problem with ARINC Standards.

didn't want pilots fumbling around at speed close to the ground while carrying multiple tonnes of meat and fuel
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2017 | 09:47 AM
  #17  
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,840
Likes: 350
From: Mts. S. of San Francisco
Originally Posted by miner999r
aviation industry solved this problem with ARINC Standards.
Of the six or seven different aircraft I have flown, no two were alike in almost any manner. Throttles in different places, sticks, yokes all different. And so on.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2017 | 11:07 AM
  #18  
Big-Foot's Avatar
Big-Foot
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 6,801
Likes: 7
From: DFW, TX-GoldCanyon, AZ
Originally Posted by GlueGuy
Of the six or seven different aircraft I have flown, no two were alike in almost any manner. Throttles in different places, sticks, yokes all different. And so on.
I was about to say close to the same thing. Other than the functions of pedals and yoke/stick, everything else is a cr@p-shoot. Well, at least throttle, prop and mixture controls have been somewhat close to center of the panel.. Trim is in various locations, instrumentation is no where near standardized.
Randy
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2017 | 11:09 AM
  #19  
leikos's Avatar
leikos
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
It really surprises me that all Fords aren't the same. That's just dumb. At least between my wife's Merc and my BMW, I can understand - German rivalry demands that all the controls be exactly the opposite. But I guess it's probably similar within Ford, each new design team trying to outdo the other.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2017 | 12:00 PM
  #20  
CR172's Avatar
CR172
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 82
From: N. Texas
I really don't see this as a problem. Kind of reminds me of a member on a Harley forum asking why Harley didn't put a warning light for when your forks are locked...... Really?
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2017 | 09:12 PM
  #21  
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,840
Likes: 350
From: Mts. S. of San Francisco
Originally Posted by Big-Foot
I was about to say close to the same thing. Other than the functions of pedals and yoke/stick, everything else is a cr@p-shoot. Well, at least throttle, prop and mixture controls have been somewhat close to center of the panel.. Trim is in various locations, instrumentation is no where near standardized.
Randy
Sort of. The colors of the throttle, carb heat, and mixture are all the same (white, red, blue), but the placement is all over the map. My Long-EZ had the stick on the right armrest, and the throttle/mixture/heat on the left armrest. In the center was the nose wheel retract and throttle/gear warning buttons/buzzer. Also had the speed brake and elevator trim on the left arm rest.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2017 | 09:19 PM
  #22  
Big-Foot's Avatar
Big-Foot
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 6,801
Likes: 7
From: DFW, TX-GoldCanyon, AZ
Originally Posted by GlueGuy
Sort of. The colors of the throttle, carb heat, and mixture are all the same (white, red, blue), but the placement is all over the map. My Long-EZ had the stick on the right armrest, and the throttle/mixture/heat on the left armrest. In the center was the nose wheel retract and throttle/gear warning buttons/buzzer. Also had the speed brake and elevator trim on the left arm rest.
Long-EZ was not really a production aircraft - but was sure a heart-throb of mine for a very long time....
I switched back and forth between various Piper / Cessna / BeechCraft but was very close to doing a kit plane..
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2017 | 09:28 PM
  #23  
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,840
Likes: 350
From: Mts. S. of San Francisco
Originally Posted by Big-Foot
Long-EZ was not really a production aircraft - but was sure a heart-throb of mine for a very long time....
I switched back and forth between various Piper / Cessna / BeechCraft but was very close to doing a kit plane..
Don't feel bad. 80% of all homebuilts never got finished. Mine took me 7 years. Of course I was working 80 hour weeks in Silicon Valley at the same time. And the Long-EZ was never a "kit"; you pretty much built everything with a few exceptions like engine, wheels/tires, canopy, propeller, engine mount, and several of the metal parts. None of those things came in a kit, you had to purchase them on the open market. It was the most fun to fly of any aircraft that I've flown in. I've had time in Cessnas, Pipers, Mooneys, and even a Rockwell Commander. The EZ was just way more fun.
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2017 | 06:42 PM
  #24  
miner999r's Avatar
miner999r
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 6
From: Alberta
you are correct the controls / instrumentation in general aviation aircraft especially the older ones is highly variable. I was thinking more of modern heavy commercial.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ytlogger
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
6
May 15, 2011 01:11 AM
wheelz
Aerostar
1
Aug 6, 2006 12:37 AM
88svt
Modular V10 (6.8l)
2
Jun 17, 2005 10:26 AM
PWRSTK2K
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
Oct 30, 2004 11:23 PM
nwajetmech
1997 - 2003 F150
3
Mar 13, 2004 07:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.