When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
While I was at the RV storage yard I was looking around and spotted a fifth wheel trailer with a gooseneck instead. It was interesting so I took a closer look and realized there were no safety chains. Is that normal? It did have a breakaway cable for the brakes.
So gooseneck conversions are bad. Do any "fifth wheel" trailers come with a gooseneck from the factory? A gooseneck system seems to be way more simple and weigh less.
To my knowledge, all goosenecks are required by law to have chains. Frankly I'm surprised that 5'ers are not. I'm not arguing either side of this, just surprised it's not a requirement in our super-litigious society.
As to the gooseneck adapter question... Oh boy, here we go again.
This always turns into a melee, but as someone who has spent the last 30(+) years fabricating hitches, trailers and farm implements, I would NOT just blindly throw a converter on a 5th wheel travel trailer. The forces and load paths are considerably different, and the trailer frame has to be designed accordingly. Also, I don't see the Reese GooseBox as any kind of solution. Yes, it eliminates the risk of snapping the kingpin, but does nothing for the trailer frame. Both the lateral and longitudinal forces applied to the upper trailer frame are greater with a gooseneck. Look up under the front of a GN livestock trailer (or low-bed) and you'll see a lot of extended gusseting and triangulation that a 5'er trailer doesn't have.
That hitch looks very tempting. If I had it to do over, that would be my choice. Presently I have the B&W with a Companion hitch. Its very well built but heavy. If it weren't for the structural concerns I'd convert the trailer to a gooseneck in a heartbeat.
In all fairness, it is NOT a gooseneck - we don't do ourselves any favors in calling it that (I do it too). Actually it is a ball mount conversion. Or, as Anderson says: Ultimate 5th Wheel Connection.
When we throw "GOOSENECK" into the mix it becomes an issue. Most RV'ers think of the standard horse trailer gooseneck and it certainly is NOT that.
BP, I dig ya'. I'm familiar with the Anderson. What I was saying was I'd very much like to have a traditional gooseneck on my trailer, since I already have a B&W Turnover in the truck, but I'm afraid of the structural concerns. I'd love to simply pluck the ball and have a clean bed. Looking back I can see how my last post could be read a couple different ways. The Anderson is appealing from a weight standpoint (footprint is basically the same as what I have now) because that Companion is heavy. Lugging it out of the shed and around the house is the one thing I DON'T look forward to when prepping for a trip. From a functional standpoint I'd say the Anderson is no different than a fully articulated 5'er.
another choice... is the Andersen.... (WHAT ??).....
I have a TT... thinking about a 5th Wheel toy hauler... 36 foot,
decided on the B/W Companion..16k.. then read here of the Andersen...
Now I do not know what to do..!!
Question::: does the shoe of a standard 5th wheel hitch CARRY!! much weight??.. as if the PIN hold most of the weight in the Claws???? UP/Down weight.. not just pull/brake weight.
and the adapter bending parts on pin box !!
I am not even close on Carry weight/pin weight..... 11k trailer.. and label states 2,200.. my truck will do 3,600 carry over rear axle.
BP, I dig ya'. I'm familiar with the Anderson. What I was saying was I'd very much like to have a traditional gooseneck on my trailer, since I already have a B&W Turnover in the truck, but I'm afraid of the structural concerns. I'd love to simply pluck the ball and have a clean bed. Looking back I can see how my last post could be read a couple different ways. The Anderson is appealing from a weight standpoint (footprint is basically the same as what I have now) because that Companion is heavy. Lugging it out of the shed and around the house is the one thing I DON'T look forward to when prepping for a trip. From a functional standpoint I'd say the Anderson is no different than a fully articulated 5'er.
What exactly are your structural concerns ? To the truck or the trailer? If you use the aluminum Anderson you are speaking of 40 # or less to remove it from the bed. Yes, the rails will remain, but so what? They don't bother using the bed that much at all.... surely not as much a one HEAVY Companion! Don't know if your truck has the ability to have the Ford puck system for the Goose ball - but if it does, the goose version of the Anderson leaves NOTHING in the bed.