When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm thinking of replacing my 2 barrel system w/a 4 barrel setup on the 292 in my 57 truck. Engine is stock except for installing headers and noisemaker mufflers. I've been checking out manifolds and carbs on EBAY, supposing all y block manifolds will swap out w/each other. Anybody got any recommendations for a carb? I'm not sure what a good cfm rating or part number would be for the swap. I'm going to go w/a rebuilder carb, anybody got any suggestions for type and application fit to manifold ?
Not all 4V manifolds are the same, 55-56 use a small square bolt pattern for the earlie Holley teapot/Carter/Rochester type carb and smaller intake ports. 57 and up use a spread pattern for the newer type 4150/4160 Holley and have larger ports. I run a Holley 390cfm on my 292 with a mild cam and its plenty of carb for everyday driving.
I don't recall what the CFM was on the originals, mine is a new one, vacuum secondaries, electric choke model. Most of the original type are harder to find and so worn out they aren't worth rebuilding unless you are a purist so I just bit the bullet and bought a new one.
Thanks Jim, was the Holley 390 original equipment back then ?
I doubt it. I had an original 57 Holley, can't remember the nymbers. Those 390s are expensive and have all the bad habits of every Holley, gaskets that seep and leak after a couple years, finicky electric choke.... For the money, I'd find an Autolite 4100 from a small block Ford. Much more reliable.
You want an intake with the square bore pattern. The factory manifold will have ECZ-9425-B on it.
However, these are getting ridiculously expensive - for only a little more, you can get an even better aftermarket aluminum manifold from http://www.ford-y-block.com
A more cost effective option is to get the ecz-9425-A manifold and use an adapter for the square bore carburetor. This will leave some performance potential on the table but with much less cost, and should still be a nice upgrade.
For the money, the Summit carburetors are hard to beat. The 500cfm should work great, and give you a little room to work with for other upgrades. The most important thing with any carb is to tune it.
You want an intake with the square bore pattern. The factory manifold will have ECZ-9425-B on it.
However, these are getting ridiculously expensive - for only a little more, you can get an even better aftermarket aluminum manifold from
A more cost effective option is to get the ecz-9425-A manifold and use an adapter for the square bore carburetor. This will leave some performance potential on the table but with much less cost, and should still be a nice upgrade.
For the money, the Summit carburetors are hard to beat. The 500cfm should work great, and give you a little room to work with for other upgrades. The most important thing with any carb is to tune it.
Just how ridiculously expensive are they? I just made a deal on a 239 with one on it and a brand new Edelbrock carb. I know of a few more around, not saying they can be bought but you never know.
Like most things, you can still find them at a good price, if you are patient or get it with an entire engine but for the most part, they go for about $350.00.
I doubt you have a 239 with the B intake on it. The port mismatch is too significant. It's either an early intake with an adapter or it's not a 239 that the intake is on.
Like most things, you can still find them at a good price, if you are patient or get it with an entire engine but for the most part, they go for about $350.00.
I doubt you have a 239 with the B intake on it. The port mismatch is too significant. It's either an early intake with an adapter or it's not a 239 that the intake is on.
It is a 239, setting in a 54 glass top (or at least it has 239 heads with the freeze plug in the end), and it's definitely a cast iron square bore intake without an adapter. I haven't checked the numbers yet.