Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Replacing Carburetor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 11:56 AM
  #1  
jeff1975's Avatar
jeff1975
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Replacing Carburetor

I have a 1975 F100 with a 302cid and am in need of a carb rebuild. After reading several posts Im realizing that the best move is to just get a replacement carburetor. Does any have an suggestions on the best replacement carb ? Should I upgrade to a 600cfm ? Should I replace the intake also to gain more performance ? Looking for suggestions and see if anyone else has made this upgarde ? Thanks Im a newbie to the post but you guys have lots of good insight.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 07:05 PM
  #2  
Roger Carter's Avatar
Roger Carter
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 968
Likes: 5
From: Corbett, Oregon
I have to agree with UTfball. A properly sized and tuned Holley works as well as any other make of carb.
My preference for a relatively stock small block is the Holley List #4548. This was a Ford service part, usually with a Ford part number of D0PF-9510-xx. It is a 450 cfm carb, which is about the size of the older Ford 4100 4 barrel carbs. I have found the 4548's to have better all around driveability and superior fuel economy than a 600 cfm carb, again, on a stock small block.
Hope this helps.
Roger Carter
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #3  
jeff1975's Avatar
jeff1975
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Thanks for the advice. I was looking at the Edelbrock and Holley but think I will look go with the Holley after your post. How much of a difference in performance should I expect by swapping out the intake also ? Does the carburertor and intake need to be the same manufacturer ?
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #4  
Roger Carter's Avatar
Roger Carter
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 968
Likes: 5
From: Corbett, Oregon
Again, I agree with Ben. I have always had success with Edelbrock Intakes. You will probably want to use an Edelbrock Performer intake for your application (stock long block). If weight isnt a concern a stock 289/302 cast iton 4V intake from the mid 60's would be a good choice. Price for either, used, is about the same.
Another thought, and I am not trying to throw rocks at Edelbrock Carbs. The Edelbrock carb design does not lend itself to a Ford application as well as a Holley does. Throttle linkage, AT kickdown, fuel inlet location, air cleaner, all require additional work to allow then to fit on most Fords. Just a heads up and food for thought.
Good Luck
Roger Carter
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #5  
Alvin in AZ's Avatar
Alvin in AZ
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 8
From: Gadsden Purchase
Originally Posted by UTfball68
I'm a huge advocate of Holley carbs...
Oh yeah? :)
Just how big around are you?

Alvin in AZ
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 08:36 AM
  #6  
jsutton's Avatar
jsutton
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 12
From: Northeast LA
I went with the 500 cfm Holley 4412 2 barrel. It bolted right on in place of the Motorcraft 2150 and had all the linkage for the tranny kickdown already installed on it. I chose it also because it will work with future upgrades I have planned like a new cam and some E7 heads. I can always use an adapter to put it on a 4 barrel intake also, so I don't have to spend another $300 for another new carb later on when I do the other upgrades.

Holley 0-4412S - Holley Model 2300 Carburetors - summitracing.com
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 08:55 AM
  #7  
billg302's Avatar
billg302
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
I have always had good luck with the Holley Avenger series carbs and Edelbrock Performer intake combos. I put the Holley 670 cfm street avenger w/manual choke and performer intake on my '83 Mustang, 302, mildly modified, and it ran awesome. The Holley had externally adjustable floats that were a dream to work with.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #8  
Alvin in AZ's Avatar
Alvin in AZ
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 8
From: Gadsden Purchase
Originally Posted by jsutton
I went with the 500 cfm Holley 4412 2 barrel.
Holley 0-4412S - Holley Model 2300 Carburetors - summitracing.com
Cool. :)
Is it zinc or aluminum? :)

Alvin in AZ
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 07:10 PM
  #9  
Pro-Street/StateTK's Avatar
Pro-Street/StateTK
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: East Flat Rock NC
jeff1975


You may really want to think of what ( RPM range ) you want this intake to work best at!
Intakes are made for lots of different ( RPM ranges ).


P.S. I also lean towards Holleys, I like the Classic gold, because the zinc finsh oxidizing!
And the zinc finsh gets dull in places, I like to keep carbs on the small side and jet up when needed!



Wally Womack
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 08:59 PM
  #10  
jeff1975's Avatar
jeff1975
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Jsutton, Did you notice a big difference in performance ? Did you replace your intake also ? I was looking at the 4412 and think thats the way i may go but was wondering what the cost would be to make it a 4 barrel down the road if i decide to upgrade.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 09:25 AM
  #11  
jsutton's Avatar
jsutton
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 12
From: Northeast LA
Originally Posted by jeff1975
Jsutton, Did you notice a big difference in performance ? Did you replace your intake also ? I was looking at the 4412 and think thats the way i may go but was wondering what the cost would be to make it a 4 barrel down the road if i decide to upgrade.
Maybe a little bit, but the only real difference I noticed was how much better it idles. I haven't upgraded anything yet except the coil and wires, other than that it's still the rebuilt 83 grand marquis short block with my D7OE heads and 2 barrel intake. If I would have had a 4 barrel intake I would have bought a 600 cfm 4 barrel, but I didn't have the money for the intake and carb so I went with the one that would work on my intake and wouldn't have to buy another carb in couple of years when I do make my changes. I can just put an adapter on a four barrel intake and use this one for many more years. Then when I do need another carb I'll get a 4 barrel.

My decision on the 4412 was mainly what is going to be dependable and could I use now and later! I love it and I'm very happy with my choice, but like I said earlier if I would have had the extra money I would have gotten the 4 barrel combo.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 11:46 AM
  #12  
Roger Carter's Avatar
Roger Carter
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 968
Likes: 5
From: Corbett, Oregon
Be aware that a 2 barrel carb is rated differently than a 4 barrel, meaning that the CFM rating of a 2V is not equal to a 4V carb.
Typically, a 2 barrel is rated at 3" vacuum and a 4 barrel is rated at 1.5". In other words, a 500 CFM 2 barrel flows much more than a 500 CFM 4 barrel. I use a rule of thumb that a 2 barrel CFM X 1.4 = 4 barrel CFM. (500 X 1.4 = 700 CFM). Again, this is my rule of thumb.

I have ALWAYS found that when sizing a carb for a stock, or near stock, application, smaller is better. This applies to driviability, economy and most of all, user satisfaction.
Hope this is helpful.
Roger Carter
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 01:51 PM
  #13  
kirkallen143's Avatar
kirkallen143
New User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Actually the Holley 4412 only flows 354cfm. R.C. I think you multiplied when you should have divided.

Kirk
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 04:26 PM
  #14  
1977f150xlt's Avatar
1977f150xlt
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 2
From: London, Ontario Canada
i would go with a edelbrock 600 cfm performer 4 barrel, the nice thing with a edelbrock is no fuel leaks, theres only one gasket and its above the fuel level, and i bolted mine right out of the box and turned the key and instant start! no tuning, there might be some tuning once it hits the road of course, but it idles like a dream, and its made in the U.S.A. and not china! or Mexico! i am unsure of holleys build location i hope its in the U.S.A.! anyways you can buy new or buy a reman from edelbrock for 249.99 that has electric choke or go with manual for less, and i had no problems installing it on my 302, and i have had experience with holleys going out of tune and are a pain in the rear end! go with a edelbrock carb and intake and hear that all edelbrock power roar! thats my two cents, any one else use a edelbrock carb before?
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 04:49 PM
  #15  
hairyboxnoogle's Avatar
hairyboxnoogle
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,945
Likes: 13
I like weiend intakes myself. Get an intake with an Idle-5000 rpms or so powerband. And if you get a cam, you do want the powerbands to match, brand does not affect this. As far as carbs go. Somewhere around 500 cfm should do nice. If you wheel alot id get the truck avenger. IMHO, ive never heard of any intake adding 15hp to any stock engine. if you were to only change your intake on your 302 you would net probly 3-4 hp, and maybe .2 mpg. But, combine an intake with a carb, cam and exaust, and that intake will add 15 hp maybe. Especially if you have some compression and headwork. Just remember this. Everything you do to an engine, is influenced by everything else.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE