1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

Carburetor for a 1969 or 1970 Camper Special

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-20-2016, 03:27 PM
Jeremiah Hurley's Avatar
Jeremiah Hurley
Jeremiah Hurley is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carburetor for a 1969 or 1970 Camper Special

I am knew here, but am looking for a little help. I have inherited a '69 or '70 Camper Special with a 390 in it. I am trying to find the best carburetor for that engine. The truck will be driven, but not necessarily a daily driver. I am not looking for the highest performance possible. Mainly looking for the most effective and efficient for the longevity of the engine. Thanks for reading.
 
  #2  
Old 12-20-2016, 03:50 PM
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Tedster9 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes on 65 Posts
Welcome to FTE

Carb selection can be pretty contentious, but if you're not so interested on wringing all the top end highspeed performance out of it, a stock size carburetor will offer crisp throttle response and good low end torque. That's why Ford chose the carburetors they did. Smaller venturis means greater velocity through the carb and better fuel atomization.

If you dig around the Ford service manuals the stock venturi size carb will be listed, likely an Autolite. Probably 1.08" or 1.12" depending on gearing and transmission. These are excellent carburetors, manual will also list the correct jetting, power valve and other settings.

It's usually better to err on the side of too small versus too large when it comes to a carb, even if tuning for max power. Holley makes a 350 CFM that would work well if you want a little more zing than factory. Whatever carb you choose keep in mind nothing is "bolt and go" it will still have to be setup and adjusted for your particular engine if you want easy starts hot and cold, good driveability, and optimum power as well as economy. A lot of carbs are pig rich right out of the box, this is "safer" tho plugs will foul badly and fuel economy and emissions will be terrible.
 
  #3  
Old 12-20-2016, 04:05 PM
dfdiamond's Avatar
dfdiamond
dfdiamond is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the autolite 2100 or 2150 carbs are what came stock.
 
  #4  
Old 12-20-2016, 05:22 PM
JEFFFAFA's Avatar
JEFFFAFA
JEFFFAFA is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Phoenix, Az.
Posts: 14,198
Received 169 Likes on 149 Posts
2X Ted. Also I'll add that the Ford Autolite 2V carb is one of the best out there for drivability and low to midrange power. One that came on a 390 would have about 350CFM. My 1st choice for your situation would be to keep the stock carb and just rebuild and soak the parts once it's apart. Get the best quality carb kit out there for it. Still available from Ford. Part number D4AZ9A586A. Note, if it is a 1970 carb, it will have a choke pull off diaphragm in the top of it. This doesn't come in the kit. It's part number was D0AZ9J549C. Discontinued but the are NOS companies and Ford Dealers out there that still have it. Prolly available aftermarket also.
My second choice for your situation would be a Holley 350CFM 2V list #7448. This comes with a manual choke. And so will your truck if it's a 1969.
 
  #5  
Old 12-20-2016, 06:15 PM
orich's Avatar
orich
orich is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: **** hole San Jose ca.
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Why is it your looking for a carb, is the one on your truck now missing.
Or needs rebuilding.

Many people stop driving these trucks due to using unleaded gas that burns out the exh seats.

Most people think it is the carb cause the engine pops back out the carb.

The fix is rebuilding the heads with harden exh. seats.

Orich
 
  #6  
Old 12-20-2016, 09:56 PM
nkf's Avatar
nkf
nkf is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lots of good people here to help. Share what is going on. You never know what some will find to help.
 
  #7  
Old 12-21-2016, 12:43 AM
GaryKip's Avatar
GaryKip
GaryKip is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Lind, WA- Eastern WA
Posts: 4,092
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
If you decide to buy the replacement Holly carb that JEFFFAFA spoke about, it's on sale this month from Holley.
 
  #8  
Old 12-21-2016, 01:20 AM
matthewq4b's Avatar
matthewq4b
matthewq4b is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St Albert, Alberta
Posts: 5,831
Received 114 Likes on 97 Posts
A truck 360/390 should have had a 1.21/23 2100 Autolite

1.08's were used on 289 and 302's 1.12/4's would have been used on 351's and the 1.33's on the 429's

If it is a 2 BBL then the best option is the original 1.21/3" venturi Autolite 2100 carb.

The Autolite 2100 is dead nuts simple, reliable as dirt, and stupid easy to tune and rebuild.

Personally I would not even look at the Holley for a Ford 2BBL application. If you want more performance find a 1.33 venturi Autolite 2100

The 1.21 is 351 CFM the 1.23 id 356 CFM and the 1.33 is 425 CFM

Really to spend the extra money on a Holley 2BBL that offers no advantage what so ever over the Autolite 2100 is kind of pointless in my opinion.
 
  #9  
Old 12-21-2016, 09:33 AM
JEFFFAFA's Avatar
JEFFFAFA
JEFFFAFA is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Phoenix, Az.
Posts: 14,198
Received 169 Likes on 149 Posts
Originally Posted by matthewq4b
A truck 360/390 should have had a 1.21/23 2100 Autolite

1.08's were used on 289 and 302's 1.12/4's would have been used on 351's and the 1.33's on the 429's

If it is a 2 BBL then the best option is the original 1.21/3" venturi Autolite 2100 carb.

The Autolite 2100 is dead nuts simple, reliable as dirt, and stupid easy to tune and rebuild.

Personally I would not even look at the Holley for a Ford 2BBL application. If you want more performance find a 1.33 venturi Autolite 2100

The 1.21 is 351 CFM the 1.23 id 356 CFM and the 1.33 is 425 CFM

Really to spend the extra money on a Holley 2BBL that offers no advantage what so ever over the Autolite 2100 is kind of pointless in my opinion.
Generally speaking, the Holleys have a stronger power circuit than the Autolite 2100. And there are more choices of power valves for the Holley. Don't get me wrong Matt, I am a fan of the 2100. Awesome carb. Especially considering Ford came out with it way back in the late 50's. But the Holley 2300 is even more simple to rebuild and tune.



 
  #10  
Old 12-21-2016, 09:59 AM
matthewq4b's Avatar
matthewq4b
matthewq4b is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St Albert, Alberta
Posts: 5,831
Received 114 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by JEFFFAFA
Generally speaking, the Holleys have a stronger power circuit than the Autolite 2100. And there are more choices of power valves for the Holley. Don't get me wrong Matt, I am a fan of the 2100. Awesome carb. Especially considering Ford came out with it way back in the late 50's. But the Holley 2300 is even more simple to rebuild and tune.

Holley power valves work in the Autolites they are interchangeable so there is a just a broad selection for the 2100.
And when it comes to the power circuit that is only a consideration in high performance applications. And the Autolites will flow as much as stock Holley on the PV circuit more than the early style Holley PV's. The large window PV's are an Autolite thing originally.

Modifying the Autoilite PV circuit is more complicated than the Holley but can be done and really this is only a necessity in race applications.

The Autolites have a more sensitive and better fuel circuit signal due to the annular discharge boosters and thus are more efficient..

Both carbs were designed by the same engineering team the Autolite being a later design fixed some of the problems inherent in the earlier Holley design.

The only advantage the 2300 has over the 2100 is you don't have to pull the carb to change the PV. But you have to disassemble most of the carb and replace all the fuel bowl gaskets to change the Holley PV where as the Autolite is just 4 screws and you can reuse the gasket 99% of the time..

In a Ford application there are zero modifications needed to drop a 2100 on and you get to use the shop manual for tuning and set up no guessing required.

Given the choice between a 2100 or buying a new 2300 Holley this really is no contest in terms of reliability, service, tuning (the Autolite is actually easier and more accurate) and cost the 2100 is far and away a better choice.
 
  #11  
Old 12-21-2016, 10:10 AM
JEFFFAFA's Avatar
JEFFFAFA
JEFFFAFA is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Phoenix, Az.
Posts: 14,198
Received 169 Likes on 149 Posts
Originally Posted by matthewq4b

Modifying the Autoilite PV circuit is more complicated than the Holley but can be done and really this only a necessity in race applications.
The Autolites have a have a more sensitive and better fuel circuit signal due to the annular discharge boosters.

Both carbs were designed by the same engineering team the Autolite being a later design fixed some of the problems inherent in the earlier Holley design.
And haul/tow applications. 2X on the annular discharge booster venturis. That one was brilliant on Ford's behalf. More sensitive and also the fuel is atomized in to the air flow better because the fuel droplets are smaller. Easier to blend with the air. I didn't know about the same engineering team. I've often wondered about the Autolite 4100 and the Holley 4160 being rather similar. Also the original 1967 Autolite 4300 and the Rochester Q-jet.
BTW, good info on the carbs Matt. Tried to REP ya for it. I can't until I "spread it around more first".
 
  #12  
Old 12-21-2016, 02:57 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by dfdiamond
I think the autolite 2100 or 2150 carbs are what came stock.
No 2150's until 1975.
 
The following users liked this post:
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
knash0727
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
11
01-25-2010 02:21 PM
kadrocker
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
10
01-01-2010 08:26 PM
klatt_89
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
3
05-10-2007 08:32 AM
Bobber72
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
3
11-26-2003 12:23 AM
Titus Smith
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
09-17-1999 04:14 PM



Quick Reply: Carburetor for a 1969 or 1970 Camper Special



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.