6.2L V8 Discuss the 6.2L V8

6.2 update for 2017

  #31  
Old 08-08-2016, 11:41 AM
SportCustom's Avatar
SportCustom
SportCustom is offline
Cross-Country
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SportCustom

Horsepower:
385 @ 5500 rpm (2011-16 6.2L V8 gas engine)
385 @ 5750 rpm (2017 6.2L V8 gas engine)
Torque:
405 @ 4500 rpm (2011-16 6.2L V8 gas engine)
430 @ 3800 rpm (2017 6.2L V8 gas engine)

The extra torque at a lower rpm will be nice. But, if it is true that "torque gets you going and horsepower keeps you going," will this mean that the 6.2L will have to turn more rpm (5750 rpm for 2017 vs. 5500 rpm for 2011-16) to maintain forward speed under load? If so, it DOES appear that the 4.30 gears (vs. 3.73 ) is still my choice for towing under load on mountain inclines with a 2017 6.2L! Of course, the new TorqShift-G transmission in the F-250 should probably be considered in all of this somehow.

Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than myself on engine power specs vs. towing performance can shed some light on this.
Still very interested in hearing what y'all think about what effect max HP at a higher rpm in the new 6.2L than before will mean in performance (and even economy), especially when towing. Any thoughts?
 
  #32  
Old 08-08-2016, 12:02 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
What it ultimately means is they brought the torque curve up earlier, sacrificing some torque at the higher end.

HP = (torque * 5252)/RPM

That means it's making LESS torque up high, but at a difference of only 250 RPM, that's basically a statistical anomaly

What I see from these numbers is, everything being equal (like gearing and tranny), it'll pull better at lower RPMs without sacrificing any (or a small fraction of) top-end power.

If they're changing the tranny and adding more gears to it, I can only see that as even more of an advantage.

The lower peak torque number will also help it pull in overdrive at highway speeds. It might get better gas mileage on the flats pulling big loads.

Until someone gets one under their rear-end and pulls a load, all bets are off ...
 
  #33  
Old 08-08-2016, 01:40 PM
rvpuller's Avatar
rvpuller
rvpuller is offline
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Home Base Nebraska
Posts: 6,040
Received 425 Likes on 279 Posts
Until we see a torque curve it's going to be hard to see what the difference would be. I've been running gas motors for so long that going from 4500 to 3800 wouldn't be that big a selling point and 25 more ft lbs of torque won't make me run out and buy a new one.

I remember when I was looking at buying a 6.2 the curve that 5 Star put out was pretty flat from 3200 to 4500 and when I'm pulling that's where it pulls the best but after 4500 it really drops off. The HP and Torque curves intersect at about 4500, HP climbs and Torque drops off fast. It will be interesting to see a HP and Torque curve at the rear wheels.

Denny

I would add that if I was a first time buyer the increased torque at lower rpm would be a plus when making the decision to go to the 6.2.

Remember the max power is only needed for short periods of time when pulling the rest of the time you are using a small amount of available power.
 
  #34  
Old 08-09-2016, 06:15 PM
SportCustom's Avatar
SportCustom
SportCustom is offline
Cross-Country
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rvpuller
I would add that if I was a first time buyer the increased torque at lower rpm would be a plus when making the decision to go to the 6.2.

Remember the max power is only needed for short periods of time when pulling the rest of the time you are using a small amount of available power.
I agree that the increase in torque at a lower rpm is good for towing (and fun!), but increasing the rpm for max HP seems to be counter to towing performance on the highway.

I too think it will be good to see the power curves on the 17. It could be that the new curves are flatter and my fears are for naught.
 
  #35  
Old 08-09-2016, 07:24 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
Again, it's only 250 RPM... that ain't much. If it was 1000, I'd be worried.
 
  #36  
Old 08-09-2016, 07:33 PM
SportCustom's Avatar
SportCustom
SportCustom is offline
Cross-Country
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Krewat
Again, it's only 250 RPM... that ain't much. If it was 1000, I'd be worried.
You're probably right. I wouldn't think that Ford would do anything to negatively impact towing performance and economy for 2017 SD trucks with the 6.2L engine.

As you said, "Until someone gets one under their rear-end and pulls a load, all bets are off ...".
 
  #37  
Old 08-09-2016, 11:53 PM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Boise
Posts: 2,823
Received 33 Likes on 26 Posts
My long time friend at my Ford dealer just got back from their dealer event in Washington. He said out of all the new SD stuff they saw/drove/towed, the new 6.2 F250 was the biggest improvement in his opinion. It was night and day better for performance. This Gen2 6.2 is going to be sweet.
 
  #38  
Old 08-09-2016, 11:55 PM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Boise
Posts: 2,823
Received 33 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by SportCustom
Still very interested in hearing what y'all think about what effect max HP at a higher rpm in the new 6.2L than before will mean in performance (and even economy), especially when towing. Any thoughts?
I can't see myself running at 5500 or 5750 rpms sustained up any grade, so I think the difference will be un-noticeable.
 
  #39  
Old 08-10-2016, 11:12 PM
Squisher's Avatar
Squisher
Squisher is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,024
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Night and day heh? I'll be sure to test drive one when they hit the lots around here. And see for myself.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lead Head
6.2L V8
27
06-20-2018 01:49 PM
RangersF250
6.2L V8
6
04-28-2015 06:35 AM
68cabby
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
18
11-07-2012 08:12 PM
Charger73400
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
1
01-02-2005 10:23 AM
hellraiser
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
1
02-25-2003 09:29 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 6.2 update for 2017



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.