Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

Burning Up Solenoids

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 09:15 AM
  #1  
Plowboy34's Avatar
Plowboy34
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 437
Likes: 4
From: SE Missouri
Burning Up Solenoids

86 F-250 460, solenoids keep getting stuck so starter stays engaged. I have put 10+ solenoids in last year. Am I missing something here or is there a common problem that may cause this. I have replaced starter 3 times just to make sure it isn't the problem. I know stuff isn't made like it use to be but I would think I would get one good one out of 10 plus.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 09:41 AM
  #2  
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 97
From: Waterloo, Iowa
I'd make sure the cables are fresh and connections to block and frame and firewall are bulletproof. Supposedly neglected grounds contribute to this. Here's how to test

http://www.aa1car.com/library/voltage_drop_testing.htm
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 10:11 AM
  #3  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,912
Likes: 4,123
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
There has also been posts to use Motorcraft part and not a parts store one.
Or one from a junk yard but you don't know if that has been replaced or not.


I wonder if a marine one would be any better? Thinking a lot more money just don't know if better?
Dave ----
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 10:20 AM
  #4  
Brnfree's Avatar
Brnfree
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 65
Went through a series of solenoids myself until I replaced the hot battery cable from the battery to the solenoid with a brand new heavier gauge cable after reading somewhere that old cables can corrode internally, causing internal resistance and thus causing solenoid problems.

I've had people question the battery cable theory but since changing the cable the NAPA mileage plus solenoid I've got in there now has held up for a couple maybe three years now.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 12:00 PM
  #5  
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 1,174
Originally Posted by Plowboy34
I have put 10+ solenoids in last year. Am I missing something here or is there a common problem that may cause this.

Wow, what brand(s) are you using?
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 12:07 PM
  #6  
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 1,174
Originally Posted by Brnfree
Went through a series of solenoids myself until I replaced the hot battery cable from the battery to the solenoid with a brand new heavier gauge cable after reading somewhere that old cables can corrode internally, causing internal resistance and thus causing solenoid problems.

I've had people question the battery cable theory but since changing the cable the NAPA mileage plus solenoid I've got in there now has held up for a couple maybe three years now.

I don't doubt your problem hasn't returned, but the new cable thing had me scratching my head. I was one of those skeptics.


I have an idea of what may have been happening. Let's say the suspect cable was dropping a certain amount of available voltage when under load. This would certainly cause a slow turning starter, but why would it damage the solenoid? The suspect cable was acting like a giant resistor, and actually decreasing current flow through the solenoid contacts, not increasing it. Less current flow should equal less potential for damage.


Then I realized the reduced voltage at the solenoid contacts also means less voltage available to the solenoid coil, the electromagnet that actually moves the contacts. Less voltage on the electromagnet means less clamping force on the contacts, and thus more potential for arcing. That's a bingo! That's my theory, and I'm sticking to it...
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 02:05 PM
  #7  
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 97
From: Waterloo, Iowa
I think maybe the high resistance in the overall starting circuit probably causes the switch contacts (that's basically what a relay or solenoid is) to get "sticky" or more or less arc weld themselves together.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 03:03 PM
  #8  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,912
Likes: 4,123
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by kr98664
I don't doubt your problem hasn't returned, but the new cable thing had me scratching my head. I was one of those skeptics.


I have an idea of what may have been happening. Let's say the suspect cable was dropping a certain amount of available voltage when under load. This would certainly cause a slow turning starter, but why would it damage the solenoid? The suspect cable was acting like a giant resistor, and actually decreasing current flow through the solenoid contacts, not increasing it. Less current flow should equal less potential for damage.


Then I realized the reduced voltage at the solenoid contacts also means less voltage available to the solenoid coil, the electromagnet that actually moves the contacts. Less voltage on the electromagnet means less clamping force on the contacts, and thus more potential for arcing. That's a bingo! That's my theory, and I'm sticking to it...
Originally Posted by Tedster9
I think maybe the high resistance in the overall starting circuit probably causes the switch contacts (that's basically what a relay or solenoid is) to get "sticky" or more or less arc weld themselves together.
Less volts = more amps
More amps = arc weld the solenoid contacts!


That's my story and I am sticking to it
Dave ----
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 03:49 PM
  #9  
ArdWrknTrk's Avatar
ArdWrknTrk
pedant
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,576
Likes: 39
From: EXTREME southwest CT
Club FTE Silver Member

I had tried diode suppressed, silver contact, continuous duty.......

Switch to a '90's truck PMGR starter and never have to deal with this again.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 03:52 PM
  #10  
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 97
From: Waterloo, Iowa
Originally Posted by FuzzFace2
Less volts = more amps
No, Less volts = less amps
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 03:59 PM
  #11  
ArdWrknTrk's Avatar
ArdWrknTrk
pedant
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,576
Likes: 39
From: EXTREME southwest CT
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Tedster9
No, less volts means less amps
If your starter motor is 2000W, it doesn't care where the power comes from.
12V x 166A or 8V x 250A.
It is going to draw what it needs.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 04:03 PM
  #12  
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 97
From: Waterloo, Iowa
Yes it will draw as much as it can, but less volts means less amps.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2016 | 04:37 PM
  #13  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,912
Likes: 4,123
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
How come you look at the same HP motor wired for 120v or 220v how come you have lower amps on the 220?


I believe it is the same for lighting for the same watt light.
That is what I was basing it on.
Dave ----
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2016 | 12:01 AM
  #14  
ctubutis's Avatar
ctubutis
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 22,415
Likes: 92
From: Denver Metro Area, CO
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by FuzzFace2
...but you don't know if that has been replaced or not.
You should be able to look at the ID numbers on it, it should have a oval on it someplace if it's an OEM part.
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2016 | 12:12 AM
  #15  
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 1,174
Gentlemen, it may be time to put on my orthopedic diplomat's hat and say everybody is correct in regards to voltage vs. amperage. Sort of. Under certain specific conditions. But in some ways we are comparing apples to oranges.

Let's look at the amperage increase when the voltage is lower. For example, with an old 6 volt vehicle. In the 1950s, auto makers converted en masse from 6 to 12 volt systems. One huge advantage was amperage was halved to do the same amount of work (wattage). Less amperage meant much smaller conductors could be used, leading to huge cost savings.

Consider a 6v vehicle with a certain size engine. The 6v starter might have drawn 300 amps, a number I picked out of thin air. I'm too lazy to do the math, but the 6v starter consumed X watts to spin that engine. Next year's 12v model may have still had that same size engine, and it still required X watts to spin it at the same speed. Only now, thanks to the increased efficiency of a 12v system, the amperage is halved to only 150 instead of 300. So whoever said amperage rises with lower voltage is correct. Here's the catch: It's only in that type of situation. There's some factor at play but I'm not quite sure what it is. Maybe it's only when the conductors are in optimal condition or something like that, or how the measurents are taken.

Now let's look at our actual scenario, a 12v vehicle repeatedly burning up solenoids for reasons unknown. One poster who also was going through solenoids mentioned an undersized cable that seemed to be acting like a big resistor. Replacing that cable worked for him. Let's run a controlled scientific experiment. I've got an old VAT-40 carbon pile load tester. For those unfamiliar, it's basically a giant variable resistor that can handle huge amounts of current. Imagine I've removed the short cable that runs from the battery (+) post to the starter solenoid. In its place, I've connected my VAT-40 in series so all current has to go through it.

I'll begin by adjusting the VAT-40 to zero resistance, so it mimics a perfect battery cable. I'll engage the starter and take an amp reading as a baseline. Let's say it draws 150 amps. Bear with me. Next I'm going to adjust the VAT-40 to ADD resistance into the circuit, to mimic a faulty cable.

With extra resistance in series in the starter circuit, raise your hand if you think the amperage will increase. Thank you, the raised hands makes it easier to know who to slap. The starter will turn at a slower pace. Amperage will decrease, not increase.

I'm going to dial in even more resistance. Anybody want to guess what will happen? Pat yourself on the back if you said the starter will slow down even more and the amperage will decrease. Eventually I'm going to dial in an infinite amount of resistance (an open, same as if I'd disconnected the cable completely). The starter will not even try to turn and amperage will be a perfect zero.

Now if I had connected a voltmeter across the starter, you'd have seen the available voltage drop with each successive test as the series resistance was increased. Only in this case, the amperage also dropped as the voltage dropped. So whoever said amperage would drop as voltage dropped was also right. Here's another caveat: Only in this scenario.

Clear as mud? Maybe the missing factor will come to me in a dream tonight. And then I can add some dramatic conclusion that ties it all together with the toasted solenoids.

Semi-humbly submitted.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE