When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Anyone know the correct OEM part numbers for brake pads and rotors for a 2012 Expedition? I'm am so tired of chasing better replacement parts, I want to go back to Motorcraft. Haven't found a Raybestos rotor that doesn't warp, and haven't found a low dust pad that doesn't throw dust like crazy. I think I was better off with the OEM parts.
Thanks in advance.
Front Rotor: 1125 (BRR-227 or BRRF-93) ... can be had for $75 or less
Rear rotor: 2C026 (BRR-154 or BRRF-31) ... $67 or less
Front Pad: 2001 (BRSD-1414, BRF-7, or BR-1414) ... $60 or less
Rear Pad: 2200 (BR-1279-B, BRSD-1279-B, or BRF-1279) ... $48 or less
This is a front axle job. Can't find any BRRF93 rotors or BRF-7 pads. So the rotor is the 227, and the only choice is between the BRSD or BR 1414. Any feelings one way or the other? They will both stop, I'd rather go with whichever is lower dust.
This is a front axle job. Can't find any BRRF93 rotors or BRF-7 pads. So the rotor is the 227, and the only choice is between the BRSD or BR 1414. Any feelings one way or the other? They will both stop, I'd rather go with whichever is lower dust.
The SD stands for Super Duty. Here is some info on Motorcraft's Super Duty pads to help you decide. I would imagine the regular set produces lower dust.
btw I believe the difference in the rotor part numbers are in regards to packaging. Based on the info on Ford's website, the rotors look like identical parts with different part numbers for the retail packaged version.
Thanks, I had found the info on the SD and had also surmised the dusting would be better with the straight BRs, although it sounds like the SD may be more gentle on the rotors. Toss up. I think I'm going with BRs to start and we will see how it goes.
Thanks for the dialogue.