Notices
2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2016 Price Increase

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 07:47 AM
  #31  
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,463
Likes: 724
From: Calgary Canada
since the 2015 production started pretty late at KC, makes some sense to run it longer. They don't want to report a year of low sales, so they need to produce more trucks to sell.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 09:34 PM
  #32  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Thread Starter
|
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 59
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by seventyseven250
since the 2015 production started pretty late at KC, makes some sense to run it longer. They don't want to report a year of low sales, so they need to produce more trucks to sell.
Honestly there was no reason to keep issuing 2015 VINs after August.

Josh
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 10:02 PM
  #33  
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,873
Likes: 357
From: Mts. S. of San Francisco
Originally Posted by Bullitt390
Honestly there was no reason to keep issuing 2015 VINs after August.

Josh
It does make sense if Ford didn't want to suspend production altogether. By phasing the model year change-over, they can continue production in KC while Dearborn is tooling for the new models. You end up with a few more of the 2015 models, but it doesn't result in a product drought while both plants switch over at the same time.

I know if I was in charge of production, I would phase in the switch-over across however many plants I had to do it with.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 10:20 PM
  #34  
Bullitt390's Avatar
Bullitt390
Thread Starter
|
Certified Thread Hijacker
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,441
Likes: 59
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by GlueGuy
It does make sense if Ford didn't want to suspend production altogether. By phasing the model year change-over, they can continue production in KC while Dearborn is tooling for the new models. You end up with a few more of the 2015 models, but it doesn't result in a product drought while both plants switch over at the same time.

I know if I was in charge of production, I would phase in the switch-over across however many plants I had to do it with.
I believe it's hurt sales. People are accustomed to next year's vehicles debuting late summer. To have the dealer lots full of 2015s in October and November with no 2016s doesn't look good.

I'm not the only one that has scoffed at buying an "old" 2015 and instead ordered a 2016.

Josh
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 11:04 PM
  #35  
Dim Sum's Avatar
Dim Sum
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 34
From: Annandale, VA
Well, the fact that the 16s have Sync 3 is enough to justify waiting on the 2016 if you're buying a higher trimmed truck.

The reviews of Sync 3 are very positive.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2016 | 04:40 AM
  #36  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,019
Likes: 1,518
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Bullitt390
I believe it's hurt sales. People are accustomed to next year's vehicles debuting late summer. To have the dealer lots full of 2015s in October and November with no 2016s doesn't look good.

I'm not the only one that has scoffed at buying an "old" 2015 and instead ordered a 2016.

Josh
Yes sir but Ford didn't ship the dealer's 2009's till January 2009 and they pulled this mess again in 2015. Even though the order banks were open, dealer inventories weren't robust till 3 months after all the other car makers had their new models out.

So in effect, the 2009 and 2015 F-150's only enjoyed nine months of sales from dealer stock before the new model year was rolling.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2016 | 10:51 AM
  #37  
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,873
Likes: 357
From: Mts. S. of San Francisco
Originally Posted by Tom
The 36-gallon fuel tank was a $295 option on my truck, and it was built in February. Sometime between then and now it's increased to $395 on the same MY 15 truck.
My truck was built in May, and the sticker says I paid $395.

It's still worth it IMO.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 07:56 AM
  #38  
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 7
From: Lewisberry, Penn
It's still worth it IMO.
Frankly that's what matters.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 08:18 AM
  #39  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
I agree, I'd pay $395 for it. Come to think of it, I'd rather pay that for the fuel tank than the $470 the E-locker set me back. Not that it's not a neat toy and all, but I really can't imagine that I'll use it much. Don't remember using it in my '13.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2016 | 05:30 AM
  #40  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,019
Likes: 1,518
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
After I test drove the '16 KR and finished leaving my DNA in the form of drool all over the truck, I did go through the Monroney sticker line by line.

Admittedly, the line by line price didn't matter anymore, it was the bottom line that got my full attention. The truck had the 3.31 Elocker and the $395 long range tank. The fact that the tank was there made the line price just not matter. My focus was on the $63K+ and how I'd go about whittling that down if I were serious about this rig.

As for the tank itself, my 2011 eco has the standard 26 gallon tank that came on the previous gen trucks. The long range tank wasn't available on the eco trucks till 2012. I would have loved to have been able to increase my cruising range by another 200+ miles. If I towed anything, it would be even more important.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2016 | 07:30 AM
  #41  
JKBrad's Avatar
JKBrad
Moderator
Veteran: Army
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,216
Likes: 1,231
From: San Antonio, TX
Club FTE Gold Member
You wouldn't believe how many King Ranch and Platinum trucks are on the road down here. Obviously Ford has no trouble moving them. For left over '15s, the rebates are half as much for the fancy trucks as they are for an XLT.

I would think it would take about $57k to buy a '16 model truck that stickers at $63k.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2016 | 07:48 AM
  #42  
cwtex04's Avatar
cwtex04
More Turbo
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 659
Likes: 312
From: Fort Worth
Just bought a 2016 KR 4x4 , 6.5 bed ,max tow 3.5EB with everything you can think of . Sticker was 65 ,they dropped 8k off of the sticker . I got 31,500 for my 2011 KR F250 4x4 ,6.7, with 82,000 on it. I was happy with the deal and got 2.24 interest on top of that. Deals are out there if your willing to look.




cwtex04
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2016 | 08:04 AM
  #43  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Thanks for the data cwtex04, good to see they are dealing on the higher trim levels.

Originally Posted by tseekins
. The fact that the tank was there made the line price just not matter. My focus was on the $63K+ and how I'd go about whittling that down if I were serious about this rig
I'd love an optioned up truck like that, but at this point I can't afford that much truck. I paid a little over half of that MSRP for my XLT crew cab, and I'm quite happy with it. Pick a more reasonably priced truck, work out a deal, and pitch your wife a number in the 30's.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2016 | 11:58 AM
  #44  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,019
Likes: 1,518
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Tom
Thanks for the data cwtex04, good to see they are dealing on the higher trim levels.



I'd love an optioned up truck like that, but at this point I can't afford that much truck. I paid a little over half of that MSRP for my XLT crew cab, and I'm quite happy with it. Pick a more reasonably priced truck, work out a deal, and pitch your wife a number in the 30's.
With my kids grown and gone and I can swing it now that I have a solid trade with 2011 truck but damn, $63K for a truck just doesn't sit well with me.

For $63K, we could get his and her Fusions, well equipped and keep my beautiful XLT.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2016 | 09:55 PM
  #45  
Scott Stielow16's Avatar
Scott Stielow16
Junior User
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Aiea, Hawaii
I noticed the price increase at the beginning of last year 2015. I just decided to wait until the end of year sales. In November is when i bought my 2015 F150 with all the discounts came to about $9,000 off compaired to the beginning of the year. I'm happy the way everything worked out this last year.
Scott
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE