Changing Front Springs E150
#61
#62
ALL conversion vans were done outside the factory. Ford supplies an empty box, and then the converter puts in the full interior, running boards and junk, often does paint, and adds the raised roof if applicable. Using substandard junky parts and cheap labor. This is one reason why conversion vans died. No safety rating on anything behind the front seats, no side air bags, etc. Carpeting and fabrics were not automotive grade. They were done like campers. Consumer Reports stopped reporting on vans because buyers thought "Ford" built their van and the conversion stuff was notoriously junky. Cheap rear A/C and heat unit also. If you have children or passengers behind the front seat, none of the seating is NHTSA approved and the plastic top might fall off if you roll the van over That said, I drove conversion vans for 30 years and they served me well and nobody died.
Your van was converted by a company called Regency and they are still around doing camper conversions. I would bet money that they will be of no help to you and will have no parts or information for your van. But they will sell you a new Sprinter conversion. https://www.regencyrv.com/
I am now driving a Grand Caravan with real crash protection. It was built totally at the Dodge plant.
I don't have the mfr info, but recall there was an RV package from Ford that included chrome bumpers, leather steering wheel with cruise and intermittent wipers, a power seat base, aluminum wheels and white letter tires, and whatever they called a handling package--typically the larger OEM shocks, maybe a slightly larger front sway bar. If you have stuff like the leather steering wheel you have the RV package--look up a 2003 E150 brochure and the option is probably listed there. Shock fit would be the same as any E150 and KYB's are good shocks.
Your van was converted by a company called Regency and they are still around doing camper conversions. I would bet money that they will be of no help to you and will have no parts or information for your van. But they will sell you a new Sprinter conversion. https://www.regencyrv.com/
I am now driving a Grand Caravan with real crash protection. It was built totally at the Dodge plant.
I don't have the mfr info, but recall there was an RV package from Ford that included chrome bumpers, leather steering wheel with cruise and intermittent wipers, a power seat base, aluminum wheels and white letter tires, and whatever they called a handling package--typically the larger OEM shocks, maybe a slightly larger front sway bar. If you have stuff like the leather steering wheel you have the RV package--look up a 2003 E150 brochure and the option is probably listed there. Shock fit would be the same as any E150 and KYB's are good shocks.
#63
Here are my questions at this point, any advice or assistance is more than welcome! The van has 15 inch aluminum alloy wheels (5 lug) and it came with new Cooper light truck tires that have a C load rating. I've read that E load rated tires help with swaying also, I welcome opinions. Would a larger wheel size would help too?.
#64
Cooper tires
The only thing larger diameter wheels will help is your choice of tires. 15's are getting REAL hard to find GOOD QUALITY tires now a days. I have 235/70-15's on the front of mine and 275/60-15's rear (front wheels are 15x8.5, rears are 15x10) I went with the wider wheels in the rear to fill out the fender flares. These are performance radials, not truck tires and they handle better than the original tires I bought it with (light truck tires) Cooper tires ? I wouldn't touch them with a 10 ft pole. Last set I bought ? one rear tire blew out in the driveway (parked after a 7 mile trip from the tire store), the other rear ? Lasted a month before coming apart (Cooper Cobras) the front two ? One was out of round so bad I had to get it replaced after a couple months, the replacements were Mastercraft (also made by Cooper) these too were garbage. Replaced with BF Goodrich T/A's. These lasted two years (this is not a daily driver)and maybe 6,000 miles. I now have Yokohama's on it and so far, so good. If I hadn't put new wheels all around on it two years ago, I'd go to 16" wheels to get a better tire selection (quality wise)
#65
Interesting point about good quality 15's getting hard to find. The previous owner bought the Cooper tires that are on it. I have read many nightmare-ish reviews like yours about Cooper tires, although some reviewers were happy with them. I'm wary of them and I check them over every day.
#66
To my 95 E150 conversion I added rear Hellwig sway bar, Monroe load leveler rear coilover shocks, 1 1/2" rear wheel spacers each side (now track width equal to front), stock size 235/75/15 Michelin Defender tires and had it aligned with between 5 and 6 degrees positive caster. Drives straight as an arrow and is a pleasure.
Also added Hellwig rear sway bar and Monroe coilovers to rear of 02 GMC Safari a few years back. Huge improvement. FWIW both times Hellwig was back ordered for 3-4 months. Probably due to age of vehicles, maybe produce as needed.
Also added Hellwig rear sway bar and Monroe coilovers to rear of 02 GMC Safari a few years back. Huge improvement. FWIW both times Hellwig was back ordered for 3-4 months. Probably due to age of vehicles, maybe produce as needed.
#67
"Wide oval performance radials" from the 1970's are historic garbage and are made in other markets because there is so little demand. No performance tires are limited to a load range T, and using 60 series tires on the rear of a van or car is a silly fashion statement from the 1970's. Got a mullet too? I put BFG T/A's on my Ford pickup in 1978, and ran General XP 2000's and Kelly Chargers on my vans in the prior century. These were old-tech radials and have been cancelled or their manufacture has been moved out of the US.
You can buy Michelin Defender LTX M/S tires, which were the OEM design, in a 235/75x15 P-rated XL load design and they are excellent tires. Coopers are "mostly" American made but they are crude and heavy 2nd string tires compared to quality tire brands like Michelin. Cooper also makes 3rd string tires under different brands for loss leaders for auto parts and tire stores. I'd still trust Coopers over Chinese rubbish tires.
OP: have you ever driven other high-top vans? There is a reason (instability) why they are no longer made or sold--there are now rollover tests for new vehicles and high-top conversion vans would never come close to passing. A 10 foot tall van is going to blow around in the wind. Anti-sway bars may help a bit. If you are running 40+ lbs of air in your tires, unlikely that load range E would make any difference aside from rattling out your fillings and making the van sound like an old school bus going over bumps.
I have owned 5 conversion vans and driven dozens and the point of the conversion is usually to provide a more lavish looking interior than the mfr at a lower price. Hence the cheap seats. If you have factory seats in a conversion van, I would ask what was converted? Also, the rear AC unit may use the mfr dash controls but the unit itself is aftermarket unless the van was originally a Club Wagon. And the anchoring of seats to the floor, addition of seat belts, and lack of any kind of side airbags makes conversion vans pretty unsafe. Actually, some budget camper conversions might use the factory front seats and put the camper stuff in the back.
Many people are oblivious about what the factory built and what the converter built. A factory van with a factory interior and factory rear A/C was called a Club Wagon and did not need to be converted. Conversion vans were empty boxes sold by Ford to converters to install a gaudy and cheap interior, running boards, cheap and huge windows, and various poptops and other stuff. Plus striped paint and stuff. In general they had a very short life expectancy, as would a camper if you lived in it full time. Staples and drywall screws, not auto-quality assembly.
You can buy Michelin Defender LTX M/S tires, which were the OEM design, in a 235/75x15 P-rated XL load design and they are excellent tires. Coopers are "mostly" American made but they are crude and heavy 2nd string tires compared to quality tire brands like Michelin. Cooper also makes 3rd string tires under different brands for loss leaders for auto parts and tire stores. I'd still trust Coopers over Chinese rubbish tires.
OP: have you ever driven other high-top vans? There is a reason (instability) why they are no longer made or sold--there are now rollover tests for new vehicles and high-top conversion vans would never come close to passing. A 10 foot tall van is going to blow around in the wind. Anti-sway bars may help a bit. If you are running 40+ lbs of air in your tires, unlikely that load range E would make any difference aside from rattling out your fillings and making the van sound like an old school bus going over bumps.
I have owned 5 conversion vans and driven dozens and the point of the conversion is usually to provide a more lavish looking interior than the mfr at a lower price. Hence the cheap seats. If you have factory seats in a conversion van, I would ask what was converted? Also, the rear AC unit may use the mfr dash controls but the unit itself is aftermarket unless the van was originally a Club Wagon. And the anchoring of seats to the floor, addition of seat belts, and lack of any kind of side airbags makes conversion vans pretty unsafe. Actually, some budget camper conversions might use the factory front seats and put the camper stuff in the back.
Many people are oblivious about what the factory built and what the converter built. A factory van with a factory interior and factory rear A/C was called a Club Wagon and did not need to be converted. Conversion vans were empty boxes sold by Ford to converters to install a gaudy and cheap interior, running boards, cheap and huge windows, and various poptops and other stuff. Plus striped paint and stuff. In general they had a very short life expectancy, as would a camper if you lived in it full time. Staples and drywall screws, not auto-quality assembly.
#68
"OP: have you ever driven other high-top vans? There is a reason (instability) why they are no longer made or sold--there are now rollover tests for new vehicles and high-top conversion vans would never come close to passing. A 10 foot tall van is going to blow around in the wind.
#69
High top conversion vans built on Sprinters, Transits, and Ram/Fiat vans use Euro chassis that are built to be tall and narrow and driven on mountain roads. And any camper worth its salt will be built on a 1-ton or higher weight capacity chassis. We have friends with converted Sprinters and chassis/cab Econoline conversions also.
Your profile pic shows a Sportmobile or Turtle Top van...cool. My first 2 conversions were Turtle Tops--a '73 Ford E200 and then an '86 GMC 2500. The tops on those were pretty low when folded, not like the fixed "raised roof" that was the standard in "luxury" conversions.
The Econoline in question here was based on the 1975 first-gen body/frame E-van and in half ton form was pretty wimpy and wobbly even without a high top. The frame on the 150 was pretty flexy in itself--the Euro vans are unibodies are are much stiffer. One thing is not like the other. I have a retired Ford engineer friend who worked on many Ford suspensions, the E-van among them, and had some really good stories about how things were done inside Ford.
You can buy tall motorhomes built on E450 and E550 chassis-cabs. But doing "luxury" conversions on E150's was the game in the 70's thru the 2000's. Take a stripper box van and put a bunch of cheap stuff on it, so long as you could keep the weight within the GVW... Loss leaders for people who wanted a mobile living room. High tops on E150's were not a recipe for a stable vehicle, and when they are 20 years old, may be pretty loose and sloppy.
Ford also did REALLY dumb stuff like making a E150 cargo vans with an EXTENDED body. I can still picture those things, overloaded by a factor of 4 or 5, dragging their tails down the road. Maybe it's not a good idea to build a vehicle with 1000 cubic feet inside and a payload of 1000 lbs
Your profile pic shows a Sportmobile or Turtle Top van...cool. My first 2 conversions were Turtle Tops--a '73 Ford E200 and then an '86 GMC 2500. The tops on those were pretty low when folded, not like the fixed "raised roof" that was the standard in "luxury" conversions.
The Econoline in question here was based on the 1975 first-gen body/frame E-van and in half ton form was pretty wimpy and wobbly even without a high top. The frame on the 150 was pretty flexy in itself--the Euro vans are unibodies are are much stiffer. One thing is not like the other. I have a retired Ford engineer friend who worked on many Ford suspensions, the E-van among them, and had some really good stories about how things were done inside Ford.
You can buy tall motorhomes built on E450 and E550 chassis-cabs. But doing "luxury" conversions on E150's was the game in the 70's thru the 2000's. Take a stripper box van and put a bunch of cheap stuff on it, so long as you could keep the weight within the GVW... Loss leaders for people who wanted a mobile living room. High tops on E150's were not a recipe for a stable vehicle, and when they are 20 years old, may be pretty loose and sloppy.
Ford also did REALLY dumb stuff like making a E150 cargo vans with an EXTENDED body. I can still picture those things, overloaded by a factor of 4 or 5, dragging their tails down the road. Maybe it's not a good idea to build a vehicle with 1000 cubic feet inside and a payload of 1000 lbs
#70
#71
You both should come drive my high top 96 Explorer conversion van then. Perfectly stable at 90 mph with new front springs, shocks and performance radials (235/70 front on 8.4 aluminum slots, 275/60-15 rear on 15x10 slots) And it's not 10 feet tall. Just a tad over 8 ft. And no I don't have a mullet. The guy who said that needs a brain exam and learn some manners. Sure as **** don't know what he's talking about.
#72
I had a scheduled brain exam but it slipped my mind. I don't know why you think it's bad manners for me to ask if you have a mullet though...
In our neighborhood (where a lot of auto execs and engineers live) I'd rather be seen with a mullet than with a 25 year old raised roof van with the wheels and tires from Joe Dirt's Camaro How does your van do in an autocross? You really need the bigger tires on the front where all the weight is.
You might want to work on your sense of humor just a bit.
In our neighborhood (where a lot of auto execs and engineers live) I'd rather be seen with a mullet than with a 25 year old raised roof van with the wheels and tires from Joe Dirt's Camaro How does your van do in an autocross? You really need the bigger tires on the front where all the weight is.
You might want to work on your sense of humor just a bit.
#73
I had a scheduled brain exam but it slipped my mind. I don't know why you think it's bad manners for me to ask if you have a mullet though...
In our neighborhood (where a lot of auto execs and engineers live) I'd rather be seen with a mullet than with a 25 year old raised roof van with the wheels and tires from Joe Dirt's Camaro How does your van do in an autocross? You really need the bigger tires on the front where all the weight is.
You might want to work on your sense of humor just a bit.
In our neighborhood (where a lot of auto execs and engineers live) I'd rather be seen with a mullet than with a 25 year old raised roof van with the wheels and tires from Joe Dirt's Camaro How does your van do in an autocross? You really need the bigger tires on the front where all the weight is.
You might want to work on your sense of humor just a bit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Funke1
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
1
07-28-2015 01:41 AM
jamnjm
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
14
05-09-2011 02:34 PM