Notices
Bronco II Ford Bronco II

do i need a cat converter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2015 | 12:07 PM
  #1  
spiritwild's Avatar
spiritwild
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
do i need a cat converter?

Have an 87 bII, do I need a cat installed on my truck? We don't have to pass emission tests here.

Just didn't know if it would affect the engine any with back pressure or something along those lines .

Don't have a problem replacing it just wasn't sure if it was needed for anything other than emmisions.

Less the old beast looks like a diesel without.

Thanks .
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2015 | 07:44 PM
  #2  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,495
Likes: 2,809
Club FTE Gold Member
Lake and Porter counties test:

BMV: Indiana's Vehicle Emissions Testing Program

You may not have to test, but it may limit your resale if that is a consideration at all.

Is your cat bad, is that what you are saying? Or is it good and you just want to get rid of it?

If it's bad, well, toss it and be up front when you sell it.

If you just want to pull it, I would unbolt it, up to and including the whole darn system if it's all welded. Then get another down pipe/y-pipe etc from a wreck. Keep it and reinstall for sale, pass it on with sale or sell it after you dump this one.

As far as the way your BII runs, for your year, you should not have a sensor after the cat. Double check that. You do have one before the cat, so make sure that one is in place, connected etc.

It should still run ok without the cat. You don't need backpressure. More exhaust flow may change things a bit, but you are EFI, right? That system should be able to compensate for easier flow on the exhaust side methinks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2015 | 08:59 AM
  #3  
dixie460's Avatar
dixie460
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,533
Likes: 17
From: SW Florida
Nope, no engine actually needs a cat converter to run.

Backpressure is BAD. You don't want backpressure at all, you just want good velocity thru the system to scavenge the upstream exhaust gas. The reason people think you need backpressure is because they put 3" exhaust on a little motor and lose performance. This is not because it needs backpressure, it's because the engine can't produce enough exhaust volume to completely fill the 3" pipe and therefore the velocity goes down.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2015 | 11:37 AM
  #4  
Josh S's Avatar
Josh S
Tuned
10 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 399
Likes: 3
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Dixie, Immediately after removing the cat on my '94 Ranger 2.3L there's been an occasional backfire that I've always associated with the change in back pressure caused by removing the cat. It occurs when lifting my foot off the fuel petal after sustained highway driving. If not due to the change in back pressure what do you believe is the real cause? You challenged something I've believed for a long time and I'm genuinely interested.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2015 | 06:44 AM
  #5  
spiritwild's Avatar
spiritwild
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
I don't have sensors past the cat so there is no issue there. As far as what I call back pressure is more along the lines of vaccum and volume. I don't think the converter is of much use after this long, I was just more concerned about upsetting the "pulse" of the exhaust. would I need a resonator instead of straight pipe.

I understand I don't need a cat, other than for controlling emissions I'm just not sure what kind of volume restrictions the thing may have. I don't want it to run like spit at low rpm

I suppose it's going to be a trial and error thing. I may play around with another resonator because another concern is noise.

Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2015 | 12:22 PM
  #6  
dixie460's Avatar
dixie460
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,533
Likes: 17
From: SW Florida
Originally Posted by Josh S
Dixie, Immediately after removing the cat on my '94 Ranger 2.3L there's been an occasional backfire that I've always associated with the change in back pressure caused by removing the cat. It occurs when lifting my foot off the fuel petal after sustained highway driving. If not due to the change in back pressure what do you believe is the real cause? You challenged something I've believed for a long time and I'm genuinely interested.
An actual backfire is just like it sounds, when instead of combustion and related gases leaving the cylinders thru the exhaust it goes out the intake instead. With carbureted engines you'd see this as a flame out the top of the carb combined with a loud bang. It can happen with EFI too but the flame is usually hidden by the air intake tube.

I think what you're hearing instead is just a bit of unburned fuel exiting the cylinders into the exhaust, due to suddenly letting off the throttle and severely limiting the air to the engine when running under load. This happens even with stock exhaust but you don't normally hear it because the factory cat muffles a lot of that sound along with the actual factory muffler. The cat also operates at something like 3 times the temperature of the exhaust exiting the engine (because it's job is to burn everything that comes out of the cylinders) and because of that it can cook off unburnt fuel as well, before it hits the tailpipe where you can hear it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2015 | 12:26 PM
  #7  
dixie460's Avatar
dixie460
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,533
Likes: 17
From: SW Florida
Originally Posted by spiritwild
I don't have sensors past the cat so there is no issue there. As far as what I call back pressure is more along the lines of vaccum and volume. I don't think the converter is of much use after this long, I was just more concerned about upsetting the "pulse" of the exhaust. would I need a resonator instead of straight pipe.

I understand I don't need a cat, other than for controlling emissions I'm just not sure what kind of volume restrictions the thing may have. I don't want it to run like spit at low rpm

I suppose it's going to be a trial and error thing. I may play around with another resonator because another concern is noise.

Thanks.
If you leave the stock pipes alone except for removing the cat then you probably won't lose anything. If you shorten them so that they dump under the cab then you'll need to play with pipe size to get the right velocity going. Mine dump just after the cab so I run 2" exhaust pipe which actually has an inside diameter of 1 7/8". Works fine for my 351, didn't lose any low end torque.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2015 | 06:48 AM
  #8  
Josh S's Avatar
Josh S
Tuned
10 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 399
Likes: 3
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Thanks Dixie, rep added
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jrock909
Exhaust Systems
19
Mar 30, 2024 12:56 PM
8vettes
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
3
Feb 11, 2011 02:41 PM
93-331-29PSI
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
11
Mar 5, 2009 05:21 PM
Craze
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
17
Jun 11, 2004 09:35 AM
2000ranger
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
4
Jun 15, 2003 01:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE