Notices

1973 360FE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2015 | 03:40 PM
  #1  
460jared96's Avatar
460jared96
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 348
Likes: 2
From: British colombia
1973 360FE

Hey all, I'm looking for the factory HP and torque specs for a 1973 360fe. Also how is the reliability of this engine? Any known issues? Any known advantages?

thanks,
Jared
 
Reply
Old May 28, 2015 | 05:44 PM
  #2  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,419
Likes: 2,777
Club FTE Gold Member
Post 7. Ratings went to SAE Net after '72:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/2...rd-360-fe.html

Reliability: When new, great. 1972 and later have hardened valve seats. The 360 doesn't make enough power to harm itself, so they slog on for years. When 40+ years old, who knows?

Known issues: Gas hog, oil leaks at the back of the intake manifold, cracking exhaust manifolds, OEM neoprene valve seals crumble like cheese and clog oil returns. Pistons are about .120 down the hole and no easy or cheap fix is to be found. The usual fix is to use a 390 crank and rod with 360 (1960s car 390) spec pistons. Not an easy or inexpensive engine to work on. Stock iron intakes are 80+ lbs.

Known advantages: Reliable power if in good condition and you can afford to feed it. The block will accept a nearly endless stream of OEM and aftermarket performance parts, with a practical limit of about 445 cubic inches and 450 horse....

Survival FE Engine Kits
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2015 | 05:42 AM
  #3  
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
Fleet Owner
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 24,552
Likes: 70
From: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Club FTE Silver Member

Jared, The 360 is basically a 390 bore engine with a 352 rotating system as mentioned. On the drivers side front they have the reverse image 105 foundry mark rather than 352 on the older ones.

Build it out, add headers, RV cam and a small 4 barrel and you can have an awesome truck engine, that drinks like a sailor.


John
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2015 | 08:13 AM
  #4  
bigdog pitbull's Avatar
bigdog pitbull
New User
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
I just did that..Added 600 edelbrock, headers, and comp cam 262h. Very noticeable difference in performance.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2015 | 04:27 PM
  #5  
460jared96's Avatar
460jared96
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 348
Likes: 2
From: British colombia
Originally Posted by jowilker
Jared, The 360 is basically a 390 bore engine with a 352 rotating system as mentioned. On the drivers side front they have the reverse image 105 foundry mark rather than 352 on the older ones.

Build it out, add headers, RV cam and a small 4 barrel and you can have an awesome truck engine, that drinks like a sailor.


John

Awesome! Thanks for the info. From what I understand these are good engines. I see a lot of people doing the the cam, 4barrel and headers so I take it makes quite the improvement.
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2015 | 04:28 PM
  #6  
460jared96's Avatar
460jared96
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 348
Likes: 2
From: British colombia
Originally Posted by bigdog pitbull
I just did that..Added 600 edelbrock, headers, and comp cam 262h. Very noticeable difference in performance.
We're you just running it stock before? How much of a power difference do you notice after those upgrades?
 
Reply
Old May 29, 2015 | 04:29 PM
  #7  
460jared96's Avatar
460jared96
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 348
Likes: 2
From: British colombia
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
Post 7. Ratings went to SAE Net after '72:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/2...rd-360-fe.html

Reliability: When new, great. 1972 and later have hardened valve seats. The 360 doesn't make enough power to harm itself, so they slog on for years. When 40+ years old, who knows?

Known issues: Gas hog, oil leaks at the back of the intake manifold, cracking exhaust manifolds, OEM neoprene valve seals crumble like cheese and clog oil returns. Pistons are about .120 down the hole and no easy or cheap fix is to be found. The usual fix is to use a 390 crank and rod with 360 (1960s car 390) spec pistons. Not an easy or inexpensive engine to work on. Stock iron intakes are 80+ lbs.

Known advantages: Reliable power if in good condition and you can afford to feed it. The block will accept a nearly endless stream of OEM and aftermarket performance parts, with a practical limit of about 445 cubic inches and 450 horse....

Survival FE Engine Kits
Thanks for the info!! I'm starting to familiarize myself with these engines (and just carbureted ones in general) as I had a efi 460 in my previous truck.
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2015 | 05:04 AM
  #8  
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
Fleet Owner
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 24,552
Likes: 70
From: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Club FTE Silver Member

You will not see that results in a 360. It was an early attempt at emissions and is considered a dog. They have come a long way baby. A 352 or 390 will respond much better.


John
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2015 | 06:55 AM
  #9  
bigdog pitbull's Avatar
bigdog pitbull
New User
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
I was running stock before. My seat of the pants dyno can tell a huge difference. Its not a top fuel dragster and thats not what I wanted. I want to be able to put around town and occasionally pull my motorcycle trailer. I would definitely do it again. Its cool when I stop somewhere now and most times am asked "what you got in that thing, sounds good" Thanks for all the info I get from this board!!! Very helpful.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
460jared96
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
23
Jul 8, 2015 01:53 AM
Mister_King
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
Nov 25, 2014 08:06 AM
travisg96
Engine Swaps
6
May 21, 2008 04:22 PM
bigern6697
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
20
Dec 4, 2003 07:48 PM
Superfarmer 250
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
Aug 21, 2003 10:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 AM.