When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This is an idea that has been bantered about for quite some time. The answer I always get from someone @ Ford is that it comes down to profitability. A diesel option in this segment is not profitable with the projected number of sales. There does seem to be a lot of interest in diesel powered light trucks but is it enough? With Nissan and Chevrolet offering them now it will be interesting to see how well they sell. Will Ford Follow suit? Who knows. They have two engines that would possibly work well in a F150 chassis. Will the cost of the engine and the exhaust aftertreatment system be worth the expense? I for one would love to see this. Ford killed the Ranger in North America while the rest of the world got a brand new Ranger with the I-5 Duratorq diesel (same engine now offered in the Transit in North America). The numbers were just not there to consider the Ranger, perhaps the F150 is a more attractive option. Yes, we will see how this plays out soon enough.
They have a platform, they have an approved powertrain, and now they are losing sales to the competition. Done right a small diesel pickup would be a fleet favorite, but Ford seems to be uninterested in fleet sales anymore.
I wouldn't say THAT. Ford's fleet sales are huge. I am sure if the numbers work they will consider it. The reason we never saw the Fiesta with the diesel (for example) was due to the cost of the aftertreatment system and that was a tiny engine... but the car is also tiny and an inexpensive POS too. LMAO!
Tom, I have seen that diesel and it is not impressive though I admit I have never driven one. The Dodge guys in my shop say it is a pile of crap but I don't know what people expect from these smaller engines. They wont be huge power houses like the big engines we have become accustomed to. You cant compare them to a Power Stroke, Cummins or a Duramax.
This is an idea that has been bantered about for quite some time. The answer I always get from someone @ Ford is that it comes down to profitability. A diesel option in this segment is not profitable with the projected number of sales. There does seem to be a lot of interest in diesel powered light trucks but is it enough? With Nissan and Chevrolet offering them now it will be interesting to see how well they sell. Will Ford Follow suit? Who knows. They have two engines that would possibly work well in a F150 chassis. Will the cost of the engine and the exhaust aftertreatment system be worth the expense? I for one would love to see this. Ford killed the Ranger in North America while the rest of the world got a brand new Ranger with the I-5 Duratorq diesel (same engine now offered in the Transit in North America). The numbers were just not there to consider the Ranger, perhaps the F150 is a more attractive option. Yes, we will see how this plays out soon enough.
Ford may say it is a profitability issue but I would have to question that statement as both nissan and GM are doing it. If it wasn't profitable would they being doing it, probably not!
I saw a Mighty Max turbodiesel today in Kent. He was showing it off as a diesel a bit, made me wish I was driving my truck but I was in a customers car instead.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.