Interesting

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 16, 2014 | 06:54 AM

Shadowrider123

Thread Starter

Fleet Mechanic

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 1,972

Likes: 103

Interesting

Looking Back: 1961-63 Ford F-100 "Unibody" Pickups - PickupTrucks.com News

I always wondered why Ford came out with a new cab but not a new bed in 61.

It seemed that Ford was banking on the unibody to be the sales leader in trucks.

Dec 17, 2014 | 04:41 AM

jowilker

Fleet Owner

Joined: Jun 1999

Posts: 24,552

Likes: 74

From: Creedmoor, North Carolina

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadowrider123

I always wondered why Ford came out with a new cab but not a new bed in 61.

It seemed that Ford was banking on the unibody to be the sales leader in trucks.

Correctamondo Sir.

I think is it interesting that the truck was a huge flop back in the day and very sought after today.

John

Dec 17, 2014 | 06:23 PM

tripleframe

Cargo Master

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 2,214

Likes: 645

Ford management did have reservations about the integral body from the get go, a did not release it for the 1961 F 350 pickup or the 4X4 models. The idea was to take the "Ranchero" concept one step farther for light duty full size pickups. The South American market didn't like it either, they simply sliced the integral body and got a separate bed with the same styling. Why Ford didn't follow the South American pattern after learning of customer resistance is a mystery.

Dec 17, 2014 | 07:57 PM

The Masked Rider

Posting Guru

Joined: Jan 2011

Posts: 1,670

Likes: 8

I absolutely loved the uni I had way back when. Only problem I had was having to replace the rear window, twice. Too much body twisting I guess. If I used the truck for just running around town and not as it was designed for, I most likely wouldn't have had any problems. But, back then, we actually used our trucks.
Wish i still had it today. ;-(

Dec 18, 2014 | 10:01 AM

sseebart

Senior User

Joined: Jun 2014

Posts: 291

Likes: 1

From: California

Quote:

Originally Posted by tripleframe

The South American market didn't like it either, they simply sliced the integral body and got a separate bed with the same styling. Why Ford didn't follow the South American pattern after learning of customer resistance is a mystery.

I have wondered this myself--it doesn't sound terribly more difficult than tooling up with the old bed, and it's far better looking.

Hijack alert: at about 0:46 into this video, you can see the operation of the clutch pedal, which has an accordion/bellows style firewall seal. My 62 just uses a slab of rubber with a slit in it there. Anyone know if that seal is available?

~Steve

Dec 18, 2014 | 10:18 AM

limegoldf100

Senior User

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 321

Likes: 0

I had a '63 F-250 with the "wrong" bed. Never understood why Ford couldn't have done something better than that. Also wondered why flaresides used the '53-'56 fender style through '79. GM changed the fenders with each generation so that the back matched the front.