Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

4.5 v6 powerstroke ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 01:12 PM
  #1  
DanielT28's Avatar
DanielT28
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 104
From: idaho
4.5 v6 powerstroke ?

Seen a badge on a box van that had that. Never seen that before personally
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 01:14 PM
  #2  
DanielT28's Avatar
DanielT28
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 104
From: idaho
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 01:26 PM
  #3  
Bonanza35's Avatar
Bonanza35
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,399
Likes: 188
From: Norco,CA
Club FTE Silver Member

Was it a new truck or what? Never saw that either.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 02:18 PM
  #4  
dsquared's Avatar
dsquared
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, CA
I have never heard of it, either....but:


Hooniverse Weekend Edition ? Did you ever hear of the Ford LCF? | Hooniverse


Been around a while!!
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 05:36 PM
  #5  
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
i ain't rite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 65,511
Likes: 5,567
From: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Club FTE Gold Member
yup. the LCF ( Low Cab Forward) was a light cab chassis truck made from 2006 to 2009.
basically put, the 4.5 V6 is a 6.0 with 2 cylinders removed.
it was also only used in the LCF.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 06:25 PM
  #6  
Jesser02EX's Avatar
Jesser02EX
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 2
From: Oklahoma
That link was a funny read!
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 08:00 PM
  #7  
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Frmr Ford Trans Engr
25 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 24,723
Likes: 2,650
From: SE Florida
It was also going into the F-150, but Navistar screwed that up, too, and Ford dropped the program. I worked on that for a couple months.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 05:23 AM
  #8  
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
i ain't rite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 65,511
Likes: 5,567
From: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
It was also going into the F-150, but Navistar screwed that up, too, and Ford dropped the program. I worked on that for a couple months.
i had been waiting for it to happen, i think it would have been a winning proposition, even with the problems the 4.5 had.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 07:35 AM
  #9  
Jesser02EX's Avatar
Jesser02EX
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 2
From: Oklahoma
A diesel F150, that would be nice...
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 08:24 AM
  #10  
Pocket's Avatar
Pocket
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,293
Likes: 10
From: Parker, CO
Originally Posted by tjc transport
yup. the LCF ( Low Cab Forward) was a light cab chassis truck made from 2006 to 2009.
basically put, the 4.5 V6 is a 6.0 with 2 cylinders removed.
it was also only used in the LCF.
We have 2 of them at our warehouse. They are turds. Zero power and problematic.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 09:15 AM
  #11  
Smokiesman's Avatar
Smokiesman
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 1
From: Bryson City NC
Originally Posted by Pocket
We have 2 of them at our warehouse. They are turds. Zero power and problematic.
Well I guess that answers that question !

Smokie
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 10:02 AM
  #12  
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
i ain't rite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 65,511
Likes: 5,567
From: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Pocket
We have 2 of them at our warehouse. They are turds. Zero power and problematic.
the local redbull distributor here has 40 or 50 of them they run all over the tri state area.
they love them for their tight turning radius and handling. but they also only have 10 foot boxes on them.

almost all have over 250,000 basically trouble free miles on them.
the first few had turbo failures, and a couple needed the computers re-flashed.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 08:21 PM
  #13  
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Frmr Ford Trans Engr
25 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 24,723
Likes: 2,650
From: SE Florida
Originally Posted by tjc transport
i had been waiting for it to happen, i think it would have been a winning proposition, even with the problems the 4.5 had.
No, it wouldn't.

The F-150, being an under 8500 GVWR truck, has much stricter emission standards than the LCF. When Navistar gave us an engine calibration that would meet the emissions laws the 0-60 time went to 22 seconds. With the go pedal on the floor I couldn't keep up with traffic. It was horrible.
 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 08:46 PM
  #14  
Pikachu's Avatar
Pikachu
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,340
Likes: 588
From: Amarillo, TEXAS!
In the brochure it would have read
0-60: Yes

 
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 11:35 PM
  #15  
retiredsparky's Avatar
retiredsparky
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 979
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver
Originally Posted by Pikachu
In the brochure it would have read
0-60: Yes

Maybe more accurately it would say 0-60: Downhill with a tailwind!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.