Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Intake woes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 06:06 PM
  #1  
bluegoose95401's Avatar
bluegoose95401
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Intake woes

So I recently purchased an edelbrock performer for my 390 off of eBay for like 170 thought it was a good deal so I bought it going to put it on I noticed the hole for the water pump bypass seems to be taped to a bigger thread either that or there just really worn out. I think I can make it work by putting a 10an to 3/4 npt add apter and hb welding it in place from there adding a 3/4 to 1/2 in reducer to make it fit the water pump. That being said after I bought the manifold I started hearing that most people have abandoned use of this intake due to poor performance, am I going to be spending to much time trying to fix something that's not really worth the time. I hear the rpm manifold is so posed to be the end all be all of FE intakes would I be better off buying one of thoes instead ?
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 07:30 PM
  #2  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by bluegoose95401
So I recently purchased an edelbrock performer for my 390 off of eBay for like 170 thought it was a good deal so I bought it going to put it on I noticed the hole for the water pump bypass seems to be taped to a bigger thread either that or there just really worn out. I think I can make it work by putting a 10an to 3/4 npt add apter and hb welding it in place from there adding a 3/4 to 1/2 in reducer to make it fit the water pump. That being said after I bought the manifold I started hearing that most people have abandoned use of this intake due to poor performance, am I going to be spending to much time trying to fix something that's not really worth the time. I hear the rpm manifold is so posed to be the end all be all of FE intakes would I be better off buying one of thoes instead ?
$170 is a good deal for a 2105. I was at the Goodguys West Coast Nats and they were selling for $200 to $25. The 2105 is better than stock and 55 pounds lighter but doesn't flow like a 7105 because the former is dual plane whereas the 7105 is a single plane and intended for high(er) RPM use. For these heavy trucks, building for torque and with an FE moreso.

Bring it to a shop and have it welded up. If not, let me know and we'll figure something cuz IIRC you're relatively local.
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 08:02 PM
  #3  
bluegoose95401's Avatar
bluegoose95401
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by HIO Silver
$170 is a good deal for a 2105. I was at the Goodguys West Coast Nats and they were selling for $200 to $25. The 2105 is better than stock and 55 pounds lighter but doesn't flow like a 7105 because the former is dual plane whereas the 7105 is a single plane and intended for high(er) RPM use. For these heavy trucks, building for torque and with an FE moreso.

Bring it to a shop and have it welded up. If not, let me know and we'll figure something cuz IIRC you're relatively local.
I was preaty sure the rpm was a dual plan also. Or so it says on the sumit page. Would going with the rpm be an upgrade over the preformer or just awaits of money
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2014 | 08:44 PM
  #4  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
My bad .. you're right. It is a dual plane and tuned for 1500-6500 RPM. The Performer is tuned for idle to 5500 RPM. The price difference is about $60 new.

Still, an FE would likely never exceed 5500 RPM. Mine screams for mercy even at 4,500 RPM so I'd never use that extra capacity.

Your call.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bshackelford711
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
Jun 3, 2005 01:08 PM
ScottJM
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
7
Aug 14, 2004 08:20 AM
yomow
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
4
Feb 26, 2004 07:16 AM
Annihilator
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
6
Nov 27, 2003 04:17 PM
77ford
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
Apr 4, 2001 11:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE