When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What's with the 20psi on stock headbolts? I know I haven't been around much lately, but when I first got my IDI, everyone said 15psi would put the heads through the hood. I'm familiar with the nothing but hot air past 12psi argument(on the regular turbo arrangements), but the inability to handle the pressure always seemed to go hand in hand. Has something changed? Not intending to step on any toes here, just curious if the IDI world has learned a new trick.
The info was always hearsay.... typical in the IDI world.... I've seen 6.9's make over 20psi on bolts... that doesn't mean that every 6.9 will hold it on bolts, but the paradigm has shifted.... there are large numbers of IDI's running decent boost these days, because the wall has come down, its not an unknown anymore. The there have been a few to push the IDI in the past, but they don't hang around forums.... There are a few of us pushing the limits these days, and we do. Bottom line, you can't just think you can read a compressor map, and spout about how inefficient a certain turbo is.... it takes a certain amount of screwing around to completely understand things... I teach myself damn near everyday....
you will chase your tail, more fuel, tiny bit more boost, more psi more heat, more heat prechamber less expansion less efficient, more fuel, if you run the numbers, more boost from that turbo means more heat, IMO start with the IC, then play with the pump and turbo. or get taller gears, put in a cam, mount a hx40 and a trans brake, 8inch stack thru the hood and practice the tree. go racing its just cost money
I agree with racin on most accounts. Would i run 20psi on a 6.9 DD.. probably not unless i was looking for an excuse. I was running around 22 on my 7.3 and didnt even know it, no problems. Im understanding that just because a map shows "this" its more of a loose interpretation of a good starting point. Regardless, i dont think anyone has fully tapped out an 093/088 like racin was saying. No one has hit the wall of turbo explosion, wont clear the fuel, undrivable EGTs, or simply the fact that you cannot get anymore power from it period. A ****ty turbo and a great IC is not an ideal situation, nor is a great turbo and no IC... basically, if it works it works... if it dont..... well it dont. Example plot out a 7.3 on a hx35 map. it will tell you its OFF THE MAP at 2500 rpms and 15psi... by no small amount either. Yet i was running 22psi and pulling it to 3800. Also, thats kinda what i was getting at with studs, theyre a great idea, but might as well wait until you need them, or pull the engine for some reason, no sense really in pulling it just to stud it. I would suggest doing a cam at the same time.
IMO tires are a great way to make up for low gears, when it comes to MPG width is a bigger factor then diameter. Narrow is better for MPG, tall can do a lot for overall ratio.
Aftercooler, older term, used more for water cooling, used more in the commercial heavy duty trucking/equipment world.
I agree with racin on most accounts. Would i run 20psi on a 6.9 DD.. probably not unless i was looking for an excuse. I was running around 22 on my 7.3 and didnt even know it, no problems. Im understanding that just because a map shows "this" its more of a loose interpretation of a good starting point. Regardless, i dont think anyone has fully tapped out an 093/088 like racin was saying. No one has hit the wall of turbo explosion, wont clear the fuel, undrivable EGTs, or simply the fact that you cannot get anymore power from it period. A ****ty turbo and a great IC is not an ideal situation, nor is a great turbo and no IC... basically, if it works it works... if it dont..... well it dont. Example plot out a 7.3 on a hx35 map. it will tell you its OFF THE MAP at 2500 rpms and 15psi... by no small amount either. Yet i was running 22psi and pulling it to 3800. Also, thats kinda what i was getting at with studs, theyre a great idea, but might as well wait until you need them, or pull the engine for some reason, no sense really in pulling it just to stud it. I would suggest doing a cam at the same time.
That's nice to know I haven't been running on the ragged edge these last few years at 12psi.
As far as head studs, I know it's probably not the best way to go about it but I recall a couple people installing them without removing the heads. They removed one bolt and replaced it with a stud, did them all one at a time. Last I heard they had several thousand miles without any issues but I don't recall if they were running higher than usual boost pressures.
Oh okay, I appreciate it. Wouldn't happen to know much about the 6.9 idi would you? Okay so I'm new to the whole forum thing, not really good with performance on diesels, especially around the 6.9 idi era. I have a 85 f250 6.9 idi, was leaking from every where, so I pulled the engine, trans, and transfer case. Now that engine is out, I really want to beef it up. I was reading on a forum that is you put a turbo on a 6.9 idi that you would have to install beefed up connecting rods? Please help me with this. Again I'm not sure if this is the right area, but I seen y'all we're discussing 6.9 idi performance upgrades
Thanks, Ryan
Oh okay, I appreciate it. Wouldn't happen to know much about the 6.9 idi would you? Okay so I'm new to the whole forum thing, not really good with performance on diesels, especially around the 6.9 idi era. I have a 85 f250 6.9 idi, was leaking from every where, so I pulled the engine, trans, and transfer case. Now that engine is out, I really want to beef it up. I was reading on a forum that is you put a turbo on a 6.9 idi that you would have to install beefed up connecting rods? Please help me with this. Again I'm not sure if this is the right area, but I seen y'all we're discussing 6.9 idi performance upgrades
Thanks, Ryan
Make a new thread for your 6.9l IDI build in this forum.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.