Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

Is 16.5 mpg average?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 06:37 AM
  #16  
kefrko's Avatar
kefrko
Tuned
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 343
Likes: 5
From: Plumsteadville PA
Are you guys cleaning the line that goes from the sensor to EBPV in a regular basis? (assuming you still have your EBPV) and does that really help improve mpg or just an old wives tale? I was thinking about taking a look at mine after the drop in mileage
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 06:41 AM
  #17  
kefrko's Avatar
kefrko
Tuned
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 343
Likes: 5
From: Plumsteadville PA
Originally Posted by Tugly
Anywhere from 15 to 19.5 here... that 15 included a whole bunch of warm-up time when the lows were single-digits, and I don't plug in at work. 16.5 is good for winter driving at 70-80 MPH, but it's possible to do a little better. I got 18 on a recent long haul at 70-75 MPH
Unrelated but how do you include pics in your posts? Do you upload them to a website and then copy the address? I am having a hard time figuring it out. I took some pics of the AIS install on stuff I saw and had questions about. You can just PM if you want, to keep the hijacking to a minimum. Thanks
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 06:58 AM
  #18  
JOHN2001's Avatar
JOHN2001
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 15
From: Temperance, MI
Originally Posted by kefrko
Are you guys cleaning the line that goes from the sensor to EBPV in a regular basis? (assuming you still have your EBPV) and does that really help improve mpg or just an old wives tale? I was thinking about taking a look at mine after the drop in mileage
If it were BS no one would recommend it. Reading your post that was the first thing that came to my mind. Some guys do it often some guys do it when theres a drop in mpg. Ive pulled mine apart twice now and it wasn't bad either time. I cleaned it up and put it back on. All I can say is if you haven't done it and you're having mpg drops it's free to do.

You can find the answer to your other post by a simple search.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 07:03 AM
  #19  
Toreador_Diesel's Avatar
Toreador_Diesel
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,269
Likes: 774
From: Houston, Texas
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by SaintITC
My bone stock '97 2WD (with reman stock injectors) bested at 23mpg highway completely empty, and routinely hit 19-20 on mixed driving, including inner city Philly commute to work. On the summer camping trips from Philly to Lake George in upstate NY, filled with gear and towing a boat, she'd get about 16-17. My '99 4x4 has never seen anything better than 18, and that was on the highway drive back from Denver. My local was 14-15. I expected a drop with the switch to 4x4 (all else is essentially the same), but with all the "improvements" from 97 to 99 I'm surprised the drop is as bad as it is.
Gearing between the 97 and 99 is very different.

Chances are, your 97 has 3.55 gears and your 99 has 3.73 gears.

Ford realized what they did in the mid 90s worked and decided to try it again in the late 2000s with great success....and better fuel economy.

That's why you saw 2009-2014 trucks shipping with options for 3.31 and 3.55 gears. You still make awesome power, but get great fuel economy at the same time.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 07:26 AM
  #20  
Dan V's Avatar
Dan V
Lead Driver
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,648
Likes: 894
From: north of Minneapolis, MN
Originally Posted by Toreador_Diesel
That's why you saw 2009-2014 trucks shipping with options for 3.31 and 3.55 gears. You still make awesome power, but get great fuel economy at the same time.
Well that, and they have a whole 'nother gear to work work. It don't care if my truck made 400hp, when I'm hooked up to 13k I need the lower axle.

Driving a GCVW of 20-21k lbs at 65 mph with 3.73 SUCKS. I'd much prefer an Allison 6spd and then select 5th when I'm towing. As it stands with the 4R100 4th is too high and 3rd is too low.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 09:21 AM
  #21  
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
i ain't rite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 65,625
Likes: 5,636
From: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by kefrko
Are you guys cleaning the line that goes from the sensor to EBPV in a regular basis? (assuming you still have your EBPV) and does that really help improve mpg or just an old wives tale? I was thinking about taking a look at mine after the drop in mileage
that would probably cost me close to a grand to do. it was never done when i got the truck with 145k miles on it, and if i tried to remove the tube i would be putting a new manifold, tube, and sensor on the truck because everything is so corroded it would just fall apart
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 09:53 AM
  #22  
mueckster's Avatar
mueckster
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,298
Likes: 25
From: Damon (South East Texas)
I have only cleaned my EBP tube and sensor twice in the 12 yrs/ 217k miles of my truck's life. I have an Aeroforce Scanguage and monitor my EBP, Boost, and Autometer mechanical boost readings. As long as they coincide with each other, I do not mess with the tube or sensor. The first time cleaning there was some build up in the tube, but the second was not bad at all and didn't warrant its removal.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 10:03 AM
  #23  
Pikachu's Avatar
Pikachu
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,388
Likes: 604
From: Amarillo, TEXAS!
I pulled the sensor once, at about 215k miles and started the engine. I could feel exhaust puffing out of it so I put the sensor back in and that was the extent of it.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 10:28 AM
  #24  
Shake-N-Bake's Avatar
Shake-N-Bake
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,096
Likes: 28
From: Mesa AZ
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by 2Gringos
We're on the road in our first trip in an 02 F250 4x4 we bought this week. On relatively flat road between Houston and Dallas, and driving cautiously like aro/und 65-70, I got 16.44 mpg. Today, from Ft. Worth to Raton NM, driving 75-80 mph and climbing 6,000 ft. thru the day, I got 14.8 mpg.

Are these pretty much standard mileage numbers? Should I be able to improve upon this? Truck wasn't loaded, other than two adults and normal luggage.
Sound right in line with what I would expect for the conditions you describe. Have a safe trip!
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 10:29 AM
  #25  
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 18,849
Likes: 179
From: Puget Sound
Originally Posted by Toreador_Diesel
Gearing between the 97 and 99 is very different.
While not disputing this, I think the substantial weight difference between an OBS and a SD play a huge role.

Originally Posted by kefrko
Unrelated but how do you include pics in your posts? Do you upload them to a website and then copy the address? I am having a hard time figuring it out. I took some pics of the AIS install on stuff I saw and had questions about. You can just PM if you want, to keep the hijacking to a minimum. Thanks
Many here use Photobucket and post a link. I have not done this... I have a blue box next to my name. This is my way of saying "Thank you" to the forum for putting all these knowledgeable and friendly people within easy reach from my desk at home. In return, the forum gives me the space and an easy method to keep/share all my photos and diagrams.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 01:36 PM
  #26  
lartross's Avatar
lartross
More Turbo
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 504
Likes: 1
From: Cameron, Ok
I spent countless hours and money trying to improve my gas mileage. I still get 14 ish around town and up to 16 on the road...but, it runs like a scalded cat!
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 03:58 PM
  #27  
2Gringos's Avatar
2Gringos
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Thanks for the info. I'm spending a lot of time perusing old threads here, and starting to see that people are replacing "chips" and advertising all kinds of claims. I'm still newbie enough that this is a little confusing to me. I mean, I well understand how mods to a computer program would work with a gasoline engine. Those have spark, ignition timing and advance to play with. I'm not clear on what a "chip" could do with a diesel, though. Without spark, timing, advance, etc. to manipulate, what's left? Fuel flow?

I drove up Raton Pass NM this morning, and up the other inclines on the way to Denver. I noticed that the truck does bog down somewhat on steeper hills on the relatively mildly graded interstate. I wonder how much slower it will be with a 27 ft. trailer behind it. So I'm definitely interested in anything that can help that. I know this probably isn't that politically correct, but while I am of course interested in the best mileage I can get, that's not the top priority. My top priority is to be able to haul an Airstream up any hill in the Rockies that's safe enough to go up. If mileage suffers, so be it. I DON'T want to ever be that slow bozo pulling a trailer up a hilly road at 20 mph with three miles of PO'd drivers stuck behind him.

Thanks for the help.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 04:29 PM
  #28  
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 18,849
Likes: 179
From: Puget Sound
The "Custom Tunes" link in my signature covers much of what you bring up. Give it a click.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 08:15 PM
  #29  
helifixer's Avatar
helifixer
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,257
Likes: 7,695
From: Chino Valley, Arizona
my '97 4X4 5 speed with 4.10 gears gets 17.89 until I hook up a trailer, at 30,000 lbs I drop to about 5 or 6 towing in the mountains (see pic in signature) towed that from northern Colorado to central Arizona.

my '99 service truck 2WD about 10,000 lbs all the time gets 20, the worst was 18.6 on a long trip running 80+ mph

my 2000 excursion gets about 16, my wife commutes with it 15 miles to work, on the highway at 80 it will average about 18
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 12:15 AM
  #30  
Shake-N-Bake's Avatar
Shake-N-Bake
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,096
Likes: 28
From: Mesa AZ
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Dan V
Well that, and they have a whole 'nother gear to work work. It don't care if my truck made 400hp, when I'm hooked up to 13k I need the lower axle.

Driving a GCVW of 20-21k lbs at 65 mph with 3.73 SUCKS. I'd much prefer an Allison 6spd and then select 5th when I'm towing. As it stands with the 4R100 4th is too high and 3rd is too low.
My experience has been a little different. I think the 4R100 gear ratios work great with the 3.73 axle when towing light to medium loads in the 18k-21k lbs range (gross). The 3.73 works for me up to around 25.5k lbs before I need to think about speeding up to 70 mph or slowing down and locking out OD. 26k-30k does real good with a 4.30 gear and anything over 30k lbs really needs the 4.88 in my opinion....
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tdraym
2017 - 2022 Super Duty
12
Dec 18, 2018 08:25 AM
thelonius
2017 - 2022 Super Duty
18
Aug 13, 2017 11:08 AM
lwk362393
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
5
Jul 12, 2013 08:30 AM
Davidvc1964
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
20
Jul 5, 2013 02:59 PM
renoduckman
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
5
May 26, 2011 05:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE