When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Are there any problems with a variable venturi carburetor?
I'd never heard of a variable venturi carburetor before but found a site referring to them, what are their problems, how well do they work when properly set, and do they need a computer box to work correctly? I understand they might give better gas mileage, is this true? Would one work on my 400 with the stock manifold?
Are there any problems with a variable venturi carburetor?
They are crap, almost all of them were replaced with regular carbs. They had a TPS sensor and an ICM so they were connected to the ECM. I would highly recommend staying away from them. It was Fords first attempt at a fuel injection crossbreed.
Jimmy
Are there any problems with a variable venturi carburetor?
Not all of the variable-venturi carbs had TPS and mixture control. They were used on 351W police cars with the DS2 ignition system (no ECM) for several years.
The VV carbs were introduced at about the same time as CFI (Ford's brand of throttle body fuel injection). If anything, the carbs with TPS and mixture control were a last stab at avoiding fuel injection with a closed-loop ECM.
I agree that you should avoid them if you can. The reason is that they are overly complicated for what they do (harder to work on), and they have little or no performance enhancement potential. They are nowhere near as "tunable" as the 2150 2V.
Are there any problems with a variable venturi carburetor?
Yeah, I used to have a 80 Crown Vic with the 351 VV and finally converted it to the Holley replacement. It ran sweet after that. It would probably be jetted to lean for a 400 anyway.
Are there any problems with a variable venturi carburetor?
Variable venturis are a good idea and not a new one, the ford VV's were just a pain to work on. SU's have been around for years and aren't really too bad you had to keep oil in the tanks on top of the carbs as that was how the maintained the seal in the pistons witout precision machining. You would know when they were out of oil as your Volvo, MG, or whatever it was would start ******* out on you because the air would leak around the dry piston and the venturi wouldn't open.
The mikunis and other motorcycle carbs are variable venturi also but they depend on very close tolerance machining instead of oil and are popular on four bangers.
You can also get a Predator carb, it looks like a big cube it is variable venturi also but the venturis are operated by the throttle linkage if I remember right instead of vacumm. and I think it comes in a big 950 cfm two barrel, but with variable venturis you don't need four barrels
Are there any problems with a variable venturi carburetor?
The Predator carb does work on vac just like the SU's do but it's based on a spring control at the top of the carb. You simply adjust the spring for different resistance. They are a square 1 barrel design and flow up to about 960.
They use a replaceable cam for fuel control and are about as simple as they get.
The real downside is that they don't get good mpg, most that have tried them get 2~4mpg more from a holley. They do however offer excellent low/mid range torque and still great top end power.
I've been running mine for about 2 years and it's very tuneable and responsive, but the mpg hit does suck.
I used to work in a carb shop back when the ford vv started coming in and yes they are poor carbs. Good theory, poor design.
Are there any problems with a variable venturi carburetor?
I had read somewhere that the predators were really only good for broadband power not economy, all of my experience with variable venturis was with SU's and motorcycles. I was happy with my volvo in Germany but I kept a can of Three in One in the trunk just for the carbs.
Not all of the variable-venturi carbs had TPS and mixture control. They were used on 351W police cars with the DS2 ignition system (no ECM) for several years.
The VV carbs were introduced at about the same time as CFI (Ford's brand of throttle body fuel injection). If anything, the carbs with TPS and mixture control were a last stab at avoiding fuel injection with a closed-loop ECM.
I agree that you should avoid them if you can. The reason is that they are overly complicated for what they do (harder to work on), and they have little or no performance enhancement potential. They are nowhere near as "tunable" as the 2150 2V.
I was factory certified on the variable Venturi carburetors in the early 80s there were two models the 2700 which was all mechanical and the 7200 which had a stepper motor controlled by the computer and the stepper motor was screwed into the side stuck straight out and had a wiring harness connected to it the stepper motor richened and leaned the main mixtures by adding more air to lean the mixture or stopping the air to riches the mixture the 7200s were on 78 Lincoln Versailles with the EEC 1 system with no oxygen sensor and the 79 EEC 2 system with an oxygen sensor all other 77 78 and 79 cars used the 2700 mechanical carb all 1980 to 1985 vehicles with the VV used Fords MCU computer system (not EEC III or IV)including 302 and 351 police cars , I set up a 2700 VV on a 77 Lincoln Versailles that got 28 mpg they are not difficult or complicated to repair and adjust as long as you have a few special tools and training
The Predator carb does work on vac just like the SU's do but it's based on a spring control at the top of the carb. You simply adjust the spring for different resistance. They are a square 1 barrel design and flow up to about 960.
They use a replaceable cam for fuel control and are about as simple as they get.
The real downside is that they don't get good mpg, most that have tried them get 2~4mpg more from a holley. They do however offer excellent low/mid range torque and still great top end power.
I've been running mine for about 2 years and it's very tuneable and responsive, but the mpg hit does suck.
I used to work in a carb shop back when the ford vv started coming in and yes they are poor carbs. Good theory, poor design.
the variable Venturi are excellent carbs very good design just the mechanics are untrained or incompetent
I had one in an '80 Crown Vic 302. Loved it except first start. The Venturi would ice up, even in mid summer, so had to always have alcohol in the system.
Yeah, I used to have a 80 Crown Vic with the 351 VV and finally converted it to the Holley replacement. It ran sweet after that. It would probably be jetted to lean for a 400 anyway.
Me 2, I had an 85 Crown Victoria police car great car sucky carb. It would not idle, sometimes it would sometimes I would just die going down the road it would look like an old F4 jet at times too with all the black smoke. Once I replacedv he junk vv carb with a Holley it ran sweet like a different car!