Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

EBPS/EBPV delete dilemma

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2013 | 09:33 AM
  #1  
Tact's Avatar
Tact
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 582
Likes: 2
From: Eads, TN
EBPS/EBPV delete dilemma

I'm trying to research how to get better mpg on my '03 7.3, and I once again came upon this debate/dilemma. I've read and read and read till I'm thoroughly confused on what exactly to do about these...the sensor and valve. Cap or not/one or both, buy a bypass and install, clean the sensor and tube again?

Will I even see any improvements? Last time I cleaned the sensor and tube I couldn't tell of any improvement in mpg or performance. I have even read that by deleting the sensor or valve that it actually hurt their mpg and performance.

Is there any true knowledge on this and is it even beneficial to mess with? What is the CORRECT method of deleting them if it will be beneficial?
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2013 | 10:09 AM
  #2  
BWST's Avatar
BWST
Got Data?
10 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,250
Likes: 1,382
From: Lake Stevens, WA
Club FTE Gold Member
I hear you on the confusion, but I think the evidence leans in favor of keeping the EBPS and keeping that tube clean. If you can get access to AE and verify the sensor reading and MAP are within a volt or so, that is a good thing. Mine was off by 3 volts before I changed it. My MPGs have never been great (13-14), but I've tried to get the truck to 100 percent anyway.

deleting the valve is more of a preference for how you use the truck. I dont think it's a factor for MPG. I deleted it and went with a hi-flow outlet and non-EPBV turbo pedistal to eliminate a source of oil leak (my actuator was leaking), and to eliminate the possible restriction from the valve in the exhaust stream, helping EGTs a tiny bit. I may eventually put it back in to use with a decel tune as an exhaust brake. I live in Seattle and so it does not get cold enough here to use the valve as it was intended, as a warm-up assist.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2013 | 10:20 AM
  #3  
spongecop's Avatar
spongecop
Semper Fi
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 771
Likes: 1
Club FTE Silver Member

I did mine over a year ago and have not noticed any MPG change. Was just easier to gut it when I rebuilt my turbo to avoid future oil leaks. In TX so so cold issues here.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2013 | 11:15 AM
  #4  
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
9 ECHO 1
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 12,467
Likes: 58
From: Missouri
Club FTE Silver Member

If it were me I would delete the valve. But LEAVE THE SENSOR. You cant (or shouldnt) delete it. The people who write tunes (and the factory tune) use the EPBS to determine fueling.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2013 | 12:18 PM
  #5  
Tact's Avatar
Tact
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 582
Likes: 2
From: Eads, TN
Originally Posted by A/Ox4
If it were me I would delete the valve. But LEAVE THE SENSOR. You cant (or shouldnt) delete it. The people who write tunes (and the factory tune) use the EPBS to determine fueling.
If I were to delete the valve, what is the proper/easiest way?
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2013 | 12:22 PM
  #6  
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
9 ECHO 1
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 12,467
Likes: 58
From: Missouri
Club FTE Silver Member

Proper way is to buy a non EBPV flange and install that. Its also easiest, but more expensive.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2013 | 12:27 PM
  #7  
Tact's Avatar
Tact
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 582
Likes: 2
From: Eads, TN
Originally Posted by A/Ox4
Proper way is to buy a non EBPV flange and install that. Its also easiest, but more expensive.
That ain't what I was looking for.

I'm searching for the procedure but haven't found it yet. If anyone can post up a link to the thread where it has been deleted?
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2013 | 12:30 PM
  #8  
A/Ox4's Avatar
A/Ox4
9 ECHO 1
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 12,467
Likes: 58
From: Missouri
Club FTE Silver Member

Here are the two parts:

Riffraff Diesel: Garrett GTP38 High Flow Outlet

Riffraff Diesel: Garrett Non-EBPV/ Blank Pedestal 99.5-03

The other option is welding. I have seen these two items bundled on ebay for $100 before.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2013 | 12:36 PM
  #9  
Mr. Finch's Avatar
Mr. Finch
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 1
personally i have left mine alone, it doesnt leak, and i just take a blowgun and snake to the tube once in a while. i live in northern illinois, and a warm truck gets better mileage than a cold one, so personally i feel having better mpgs from a faster warm up out ways the "loss" in mpg from the "drag" in the exhaust (if it is really enough to affect anything).
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2013 | 09:52 PM
  #10  
MTDewX's Avatar
MTDewX
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 1
From: Montana
I have read some have welded the holes closed cause they didn't want to buy a delete pedestal. not sure all the details on it, I considered it, but dont weld and own a van now so I can't even delete mine. so I spend the same $100 that would have been for a pedestal for the rebuilt kit.

side thought, cleaning the tube is easy, but the sensor can be tricky to not ruin the diapram inside.

I just bought a new sensor after I pulled my tube. RUSTED beyond cleaning. so I got a new tube and sensor.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
creich68
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
Dec 9, 2015 08:21 PM
e350daBeast
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
16
Jul 16, 2014 08:24 PM
jasonch
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
3
Nov 24, 2009 10:12 PM
hucka1a
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
May 31, 2008 01:14 PM
JIM ROLAND
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
5
Oct 11, 2007 11:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 PM.