180* Carb on a DP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-22-2013, 02:09 PM
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
F-250 restorer is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 6,575
Received 137 Likes on 117 Posts
180* Carb on a DP

Am I crazy? Better flow for the primaries. The secondaries, that come on only for short bursts, would have a much quicker flow to the chambers. Any thoughts? k
 
  #2  
Old 10-22-2013, 03:06 PM
Harte3's Avatar
Harte3
Harte3 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It will certainly do no harm to try it. At worst, a small loss in performance. At best, a small gain in performance.
 
  #3  
Old 10-22-2013, 03:33 PM
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
AbandonedBronco is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,937
Received 80 Likes on 73 Posts
I've thought about the idea before but I figure they designed it so they know what they're doing. The smaller passages are designed to increase velocity, especially as lower speeds when you need the torque. At those speeds you're not really going to need the large capacity anyway. Then, when it's opened up, the richer, fuller secondaries have the big space to go through. Makes sense to me.
But, as said, won't hurt to try!
 
  #4  
Old 10-22-2013, 06:53 PM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Then try it with a 1" open spacer and see what that does. No worries to switch back later if it's a dud. You'll never know 'til you give it a go.
 
  #5  
Old 10-23-2013, 11:30 AM
Harte3's Avatar
Harte3
Harte3 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I've always wondered what the difference, if any, in the volume between the primary side and secondary side. It's not something that can be found in the Offy specs. I think the only way to determine that would be by blocking the ports on the head side and filling the primary side and the secondary side with water and noting any difference in the amount of water used from side to side.
 
  #6  
Old 10-23-2013, 04:48 PM
fordman75's Avatar
fordman75
fordman75 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: South central, Minnesota
Posts: 5,824
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Harte3
I've always wondered what the difference, if any, in the volume between the primary side and secondary side. It's not something that can be found in the Offy specs. I think the only way to determine that would be by blocking the ports on the head side and filling the primary side and the secondary side with water and noting any difference in the amount of water used from side to side.
From what I saw on the one I had I was guessing the it was around a 70/30 split. But like you said without physically measuring each runner who knows for sure.
 
  #7  
Old 10-24-2013, 11:21 PM
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
F-250 restorer is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 6,575
Received 137 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by AbandonedBronco
The smaller passages are designed to increase velocity, especially as lower speeds when you need the torque. At those speeds you're not really going to need the large capacity anyway.
I don't understand how velocity of air flow will increase torque. The chamber, valves, engine will be taking in the needed amount of AF mix regardless of the velocity, right? I'm not certain, but that sounds a lot like the back pressure myth. It seems like limiting the engine performance the same way putting a small cfm carb on would, by limiting air flow.

I believe the DP was made for near oem engine, slightly raising flow above stock for a 2 or 4v carb, but keeping the cfm down so the flow is not lazy.

**Oh yeah, I wanted to take this opportunity to say how happy I am that I'm "gaining momentum toward becoming a positive member of this forum." That just gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling all over.
 
  #8  
Old 10-25-2013, 06:40 AM
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
AbandonedBronco
AbandonedBronco is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 7,937
Received 80 Likes on 73 Posts
I think it's the same thing as the smaller primaries. The increase in air speed helps the fuel atomize better when air speed could normally be sluggish, which gives a better pedal response at low RPMs.
But yeah, it was made for near stock engines.

Awww, I've always thought you've had a sunny disposition.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
78bigunns
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
6
07-13-2012 01:28 AM
POPAJON
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
12
01-08-2011 10:35 PM
redneckfarmers
Performance & General Engine Building
5
07-07-2008 10:39 PM
Andy_Bracy
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
19
12-16-2005 08:08 PM
'81 Wildhorse
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
05-13-2004 08:29 PM



Quick Reply: 180* Carb on a DP



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.