Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

One Comment and One Question on Compression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2013 | 06:46 PM
  #1  
JRB65's Avatar
JRB65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
One Comment and One Question on Compression

Ive been driving the truck a lot lately (74 F100 Shortbed Styleside) FE360.. This thing gets such bad gas mileage I thought someone was steeling gas from me... Ok now the question, What should the compression be per cylinder on this truck?

JRB65
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2013 | 08:46 PM
  #2  
JRB65's Avatar
JRB65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
Drivers Side 120, 120, 120, 115
Passenger Side 120, 120, 120, 115

Its a 1974 FE360 BB and I dont know the history on any rebuilds so I dont know if these are good numbers or not. I did read somewhere that you want the difference between the Cylinders to not be more than 10% total from high to low. If I just knew the actual number Im supposed to be reading???? Is 120PSI what I should be getting on this engine???

Thanks,

JRB65
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2013 | 09:04 PM
  #3  
mikeo0o0o0's Avatar
mikeo0o0o0
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 247
From: Stanley, VA
Club FTE Gold Member
The compression is okay. Usually Ford didn't specify an exact figure because of all the variables, in particular, cranking speed. What Ford did specify was that the high and low cylinders be within, IIRC, 20% of each other.
Yours, with a high to low of 5 lbs. (4.16%) is well within the specs. Your compression is fine.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2013 | 09:53 PM
  #4  
JRB65's Avatar
JRB65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by mikeo0o0o0
The compression is okay. Usually Ford didn't specify an exact figure because of all the variables, in particular, cranking speed. What Ford did specify was that the high and low cylinders be within, IIRC, 20% of each other.
Yours, with a high to low of 5 lbs. (4.16%) is well within the specs. Your compression is fine.
Thanks mikeo0o0o0,
I kinda figured the way this thing is running that it must be pretty good, No smoke out the back and all the plugs had a light brown apperance. For a 40 year old engine this thing is pretty tight. I did find a list of compressions for a 390 and they were all around 130 to 140PSI and I had heard the 360 was a low compression engine so I figured 120 was probably good. Anyways thanks again,

JRB65

Just on a side note im getting ready to start working on my 1950 ****** 4X4 Pickup and Im putting a 1948 Flathead Ford V8 in it. Ive always wanted to build one of these old Flatheads. It should be a lot of fun to put together..
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2013 | 10:27 PM
  #5  
mikeo0o0o0's Avatar
mikeo0o0o0
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 247
From: Stanley, VA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by JRB65
Ive always wanted to build one of these old Flatheads. It should be a lot of fun to put together..
............
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2013 | 10:49 PM
  #6  
Pickupmanx2's Avatar
Pickupmanx2
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,650
Likes: 977
From: Near Yosemite CA
Good numbers, as with 360/390's the rear two seem like they are always lower, I would check your timing, do a tune-up, plugs/wires/cap rotor, points if applicable and adjust your carb with a vacuum gauge. You didn't state, but what is your trans and rear end ratio?
With all my trucks I have and have had, they had a happy spot, most of the older ones are in the 55-60 range, they ain't happy goin fast! And as I told Chanman when he bought "Ed" my 73 SCS, "welcome to life in the slow lane!"
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2013 | 11:13 PM
  #7  
JRB65's Avatar
JRB65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Pickupmanx2
Good numbers, as with 360/390's the rear two seem like they are always lower, I would check your timing, do a tune-up, plugs/wires/cap rotor, points if applicable and adjust your carb with a vacuum gauge. You didn't state, but what is your trans and rear end ratio?
With all my trucks I have and have had, they had a happy spot, most of the older ones are in the 55-60 range, they ain't happy goin fast! And as I told Chanman when he bought "Ed" my 73 SCS, "welcome to life in the slow lane!"
Pickupmanx2,
It has a C6 and a Ford 9 with 3.20/1 gears. It runs down the road at 60 to 70 pretty nice but if you get much above that it tends to run a lot of RPM's. 60 is about 2200 and 70 is about 2500. It seems like you dont have to get these engines really wound up to make a lot of torque. Pulls hills really nice.
JRB65
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2013 | 11:21 PM
  #8  
Pickupmanx2's Avatar
Pickupmanx2
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,650
Likes: 977
From: Near Yosemite CA
Originally Posted by JRB65
Pickupmanx2,
It has a C6 and a Ford 9 with 3.20/1 gears. It runs down the road at 60 to 70 pretty nice but if you get much above that it tends to run a lot of RPM's. 60 is about 2200 and 70 is about 2500. It seems like you dont have to get these engines really wound up to make a lot of torque. Pulls hills really nice.
JRB65
Yep, they are good engines, torquey and run strong, and like the gas!
3.20 should be good, what kind of mileage are you getting? My 73 SCS had 390 and 3.73's got around 10 up here, maybe 12-13 in the flats.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 9, 2013 | 09:06 AM
  #9  
mark a.'s Avatar
mark a.
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,922
Likes: 153
Is the vacuum advance hooked up ?
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2013 | 09:43 AM
  #10  
JRB65's Avatar
JRB65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Pickupmanx2
Yep, they are good engines, torquey and run strong, and like the gas!
3.20 should be good, what kind of mileage are you getting? My 73 SCS had 390 and 3.73's got around 10 up here, maybe 12-13 in the flats.
Need to go on a little trip to chech that, but I would guess 10-12 range but not sure. Im going across town today so maybe I will check it.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2013 | 09:45 AM
  #11  
JRB65's Avatar
JRB65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by mark a.
Is the vacuum advance hooked up ?
Yep the Vacuum advance is hooked up, but what I need to do is hook up the timing light and have My Son rev it up to 2000 and see if its actually working. I would guess the way its accelerating that it is.

JRB65
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hjohn29
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Aug 13, 2014 03:25 PM
phil_idi
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
15
May 20, 2013 10:13 PM
raymechanic
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
18
Aug 27, 2005 06:12 AM
I_Thnk_Ford
Performance & General Engine Building
11
Mar 8, 2004 12:57 PM
meck
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
4
Oct 23, 2002 01:31 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE