When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So I've heard rumors that the 390 in the old thunderbirds get around 15-17 on the highway...I have a 390 out of a cougar i and its all rebuilt,pretty much stock except for the bolt ons,headers,intake,and truck avenger carb....oh and a mild rv cam and adjustable rocker arms....I'm running the stock gears out of a 79 bronco with 35" toyo M/T tires, and I have a 4" lift,what should my MPG be with these specs? I can't drive it yet because it's goin through the last stages of resto...
Originally Posted by 1972RedNeck
My brother, in his '76 highboy, can get an easy 14MPG. Dad, in his '75 highboy, who drives like "Uncle Fudd", can get 16 MPG doing 70 MPH. Both have identical 390's (dad's is a smidgen higher compression) and 4.10's.
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Dana 60's w/3.07 & 3.23 first offered in 1980. Harder to find than 3.54's.
I thought that the Dana 60 case couldn't fit any gears higher than a 3.33. For any numerically lower ratio, you had to have a Dana 61, correct?
This is all f-100 half ton gears....9" rear ends no dana 60s just Dana 44 front. And my truck had 3.0 gears stock,but I swapped in the bronco stuff so not anymore
well my 2wd got 17 with a wore out 360, until blowby was uncontrollable cuz the rings were no more and it quickly dropped to 9mpg's. its a camper special with 3.73's (dana 60) stock with performer intake and headers, electric fan and msd.
i just got done with a new 390 so i hope its the same or better?!? once broke in i want to go synthetic but need a great ZDDP additive before ill trust it.
last year randy's ring and pinion still had a set of 3.07 for the dana 60, it required a different size carrier than what mine has tho. they made two sizes.
i would switch out to a 9 inch but i love having 8 LUG and the fact that a dana 60 is close to bulletproof. im going with bigger tire sizes to makeup for the gear ratio instead. my goal is getting my 70 mph RPM a lot lower than 3000+. i think im gonna have to break down and get an overdrive.
It could also make a difference between 4-speed vs 5-speed and between auto vs manual.
The manual will get better mileage and the 5 speed will get better than the 4-speed because if you are in 4th with high RPMs going 65 you can shift to 5th and be going 70 with low RPMs.
well my 2wd got 17 with a wore out 360, until blowby was uncontrollable cuz the rings were no more and it quickly dropped to 9mpg's. its a camper special with 3.73's (dana 60) stock with performer intake and headers, electric fan and msd.
i just got done with a new 390 so i hope its the same or better?!? once broke in i want to go synthetic but need a great ZDDP additive before ill trust it.
R/ The OP has a 4x4 so it's your apples to his oranges.
However for comparison, my brother's 2WD 69 F100 (360/C6/3.00) got 15.7 mpg at 65 mph from SF to San Diego. That's darn good for an FE. And I used to have a 2WD 76 F150 (302/C4/3.00) and it regularly got 17 mpg with a light foot. Towing anything were horrible experiences.
Any EXTREMELY cheap ideas for getting alittle better fuel mileage? Tonneau cover? Additives?
What kind of mileage are you reasonably expecting from a 70's era pickup truck? if you can muster 10mpg or better, you're already ahead of the game, you're driving a FE powered two ton plus four-wheel drive truck with the aerodynamics of a refrigerator, you can't expect miracles.
My '75 highboy with a mildly built 390, 4spd, 4.10's and 35's only gets 8mpg, that's all in town, stop-n-go, 25-55mph... but i drive it very aggressively, all the time, it's too fun of a truck to drive any other way, so i drive it like i stole it.
Personal driving style goes a long way in the mpg department, i experimented once with a full tank of gas to see what kind of numbers i could get, i drove around like an 87 year old retired librarian who plays the organ at her church every Sunday, i got roughly 10.5mpg from that tank of gas, but what fun is in that.
Well I can honestly say I might just drive my Cummins as much as possible while I'm in school till I get a good job...once I land a decent job ill have to get some EFI ideas goin
I have a 75 f250. I ran it with 3.74 gear with a 360, 2v, and got 10 mpg, rain or shine ... on the freeway, with oem tires/rims. I changed to 3.31 gears for about $500, and got 10 mpg on the freeway. I changed to a 390 and got ... yep, you guessed it, 10 mpg on the freeway.
Then I saw the light: I beefed up a 300 inline six to the same hp as the 390 with a 2v carb, etc. With the 300 I get over 15, 16 or 17 mpg on the freeway. With the addition of a ZF trans, I should get close to 20 mpg on the freeway.
I have a 75 f250. I ran it with 3.74 gear with a 360, 2v, and got 10 mpg, rain or shine ... on the freeway, with oem tires/rims. I changed to 3.31 gears for about $500, and got 10 mpg on the freeway. I changed to a 390 and got ... yep, you guessed it, 10 mpg on the freeway.
Then I saw the light: I beefed up a 300 inline six to the same hp as the 390 with a 2v carb, etc. With the 300 I get over 15, 16 or 17 mpg on the freeway. With the addition of a ZF trans, I should get close to 20 mpg on the freeway.
I've been lookin for a 300 really hard they are just hard to come by in California but I know the 10 mpg thing as well my grandpa had a 1990 dually with a 460 and wether you were haulin *** or driving like grandma you got 10 mpg....that was a 5 speed though. And it was EFI
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.