Fuel Pump Answers!
Chet
Translate that statement into number(s).
I am curious (not really any of my business) of how much you are willing to invest in order to try (no guarantees) to get to your target/goal/specific/etc.
This thread reads as though you are investing at least $4000 (this time) to tweak it to get closer to the results you want.
I find the situation interesting.
I'm telling you what works, time and time again, not just on "my" truck, but every truck out there.
Get a fuel pressure gauge, and watch it. You will NOT... REPEAT NOT need ANY FUEL SYSTEM MODS to run AC's. None.
100% stock fuel system, dirty fuel filter and all... It will run fine. Up to and well beyond the max rating for the injector...
This goes for 238/80 hybrids as well.
If you want to **** away money on a fuel system at that hp level then by all means do... Your very fond of your PCV potato gun, fill it up again...
YOU DO NOT NEED FUEL SYSTEM MODS TO RUN AC's.
Motorcraft: PF1
Ford: F81Z9C407AC
Bosch original: 0 580 464 074
Bosch replacement: 69136
<!-- / message -->
I conducted every internet search possible - zip. I called Ford and they don't have that data. I finally called Bosch (manufacturer) and they have the data, but the pump is proprietary - which makes the data proprietary. He could tell me the pump is spec'd for 50-65 PSI, but no more. I can do a test to see what it pumps at 60 PSI, but this is starting to get silly. Maybe I can conduct a flow test when I'm bored, but I think I'll just settle for a fuel pressure gauge and go from there.
Some might say "But-Tugly, you can get a Walbro 392 or a Bosch 044". I have complete charts on these units and they are really great performers... but they are not rated for durability like the original Bosch pump for the 7.3L. I looked at Air Dogs and Fass systems, but they are rated at 100 GPH and I don't know their durability - plus they're expensive. The 5/16" fuel line to the engine is rated at 72 GPH max. Ford had the original pump special-made for them and I'm not sure we can find a better one for longevity. Many have used twin stock pumps to get the flow and durability they seek, and this has the added benefit of limp-home capability if a pump goes out. Clay has them on the shelf for $150 and I could just tee in a second pump if mine isn't up to the task. That is just too cool.
I work for the so called Walbro (new name is called TI Automotive). I work the test center for TI and have a book at work with all of the specs on any pump we make. I am not going to lie, the 392 is probably the most reliable pump we build. We use them everywhere around the test center in hundreds of different fuels and they never quit. We primarily use them to transfer fuel so pressure is minimal but they are awesome pumps. Actually kind of hard to get your hands on because everyone knows how good they are. We keep a secret stash on hand for when we need them. I will try to look up the spec of them tomorrow and provide you with the data.
Quote:
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by Tugly
...that gets good economy empty...
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Translate that statement into number(s).
I get 17-19 MPG now and I just want to keep those numbers at this point. My injectors are due and I've had a lot of feedback that says the ACs won't hurt my economy (maybe even help), but they will help in many other ways and I now understand why. Numbers:
Quote:
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by Tugly
...I have specifics I'm shooting for to attain my goals, is that what you're asking instead?..
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Instead-interesting. This is growing rather than narrowing (sorry-not intended).
I am curious (not really any of my business) of how much you are willing to invest in order to try (no guarantees) to get to your target/goal/specific/etc.
This thread reads as though you are investing at least $4000 (this time) to tweak it to get closer to the results you want.
I find the situation interesting.
Consider this: {violin music} I never wanted to mod. I just want a reliable vehicle that would pull my next (much bigger) boat, so I bought a Superduty PSD. The word BOAT already used up the acronym for Break Out Another Thousand, so I came up with the Buck$Zooka shortly after I started modding Stinky. I belong to a boating forum and they like the way I word my whines, so they published Stinky's adventures.
Wife wants a canopy - bang. I want a head unit with backup camera - bang. Huff and puff and my transmission slips away - BANG!. What's that noise? Two injectors see the heavenly headlight and I learn the whole exhaust system is well... exhausted - BANG!. I'm trying to keep Stinky healthy, but I keep learning of issues with the truck's design, miles, or age. I got the truck cheap, but I could have bought a really nice boat with the Buck$Zooka ammo that Stinky digested in the last 12 months. This Buck$Zooka round is $4000 up-front and I can't even do all the work myself. I have to drive it over a mountain pass to rip Stinky's guts out... in one day. Many reps should go to 2000ca250 for volunteering to help a fellow FTE member in distress. If this goes well, I'll have an enjoyable drive home. If not, there's a mountain pass between home and my $20,000 worth of upgrades/repairs/mods to the truck... that I paid for in one year... with cash.
If I seem a bit uppity, it's because I am... until Stinky is safe at home and I get my deposit for the cores back. What am I doing with the refund? Tires are due. If the world ends on 12/21/12 like people fear, I'm gunna be pissed because I could have skipped the whole thing and just kept what I had.
I work for the so called Walbro (new name is called TI Automotive). I work the test center for TI and have a book at work with all of the specs on any pump we make. I am not going to lie, the 392 is probably the most reliable pump we build. We use them everywhere around the test center in hundreds of different fuels and they never quit. We primarily use them to transfer fuel so pressure is minimal but they are awesome pumps. Actually kind of hard to get your hands on because everyone knows how good they are. We keep a secret stash on hand for when we need them. I will try to look up the spec of them tomorrow and provide you with the data.
Speaking of data, I looked at the 160/stock flow model and I know my truck has the capability to drain the sticks if tuned to do so. I went with the 100% nozzless to have more options in tuning.
Great link! I guess all that reading has paid off: The "experts" already had the conclusions I arrived at. Tried to rep but....
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
I seem to recall you mentioning that somewhere on a post I read once... I'm trying to remember where that thread was.
The numbers. You gave me the numbers on the Ex. Assuming there's no in-tank pump like some have... I liked the numbers.
0 psi = 47 gph = 1.9 amps
10 psi = 44 gph = 2.5 amps
20 psi = 22 gph = 3.1 amps
30 psi = 6 gph = 3.7 amps
Let me know if you are looking for any more info.












