Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Old Vs New

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 09-17-2012, 04:00 PM
El Camino Man's Avatar
El Camino Man
El Camino Man is offline
Logistics Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Id love to have a brand new truck but I am yet to be impressed enough to dump $30,000 into one.

I like Dodges take at the truck world. They make a low dollar truck with only what you need, and nothing more. Its called the Express. 2 door, short bed, manual windows, manual locks, 2wd and a HEMI! Costs? $20,000. All power, no extra BS. Of course you can order it with 4 doors, 4wd, etc etc but costs goes up with it. Yes, you can order a truck from Ford or Chevy for $20,000 but it looks like a work truck... Prolly wrong site to say that but you get the point lol
 
  #32  
Old 09-17-2012, 08:29 PM
norfolknova's Avatar
norfolknova
norfolknova is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: 7th realm of hell, Va.
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back at the end of 2006 I bought a left over 2006 F250 4x4 with a 5.4 3v engine. Got it for a deal at 34K out the door with X-Plan and rebates. I was making a lot more money in 2006 than I make now, so I sold it earlier this year and bought my 92 F250 4X4 with 351W. The 2006 was an easy 2000 lbs heavier than the 92, and the 2006 would run circles around the 92. I will take new technology anyday over old technology. The only difference is the 2006 had a more powerful computer.

matt

I will admit the best part about the 92 F250 is the No truck payment part
 
  #33  
Old 09-17-2012, 08:31 PM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Diesel_Brad is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 21,431
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by El Camino Man
Id love to have a brand new truck but I am yet to be impressed enough to dump $30,000 into one.

I like Dodges take at the truck world. They make a low dollar truck with only what you need, and nothing more. Its called the Express. 2 door, short bed, manual windows, manual locks, 2wd and a HEMI! Costs? $20,000. All power, no extra BS. Of course you can order it with 4 doors, 4wd, etc etc but costs goes up with it. Yes, you can order a truck from Ford or Chevy for $20,000 but it looks like a work truck... Prolly wrong site to say that but you get the point lol

Then go buy a FIAT if they are so great
 
  #34  
Old 09-17-2012, 09:54 PM
rangergirl94's Avatar
rangergirl94
rangergirl94 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Geneva,Ohio
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
That 30k work truck shoot out they did wow you cant get a ford worth of **** anymore for 30k
 
  #35  
Old 09-17-2012, 11:06 PM
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx
AlaskanEx is offline
Bleed Ford Blue

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 13,574
Received 128 Likes on 43 Posts
as i have seen, there is a reason dodge is the cheapest...just sayin
 
  #36  
Old 09-18-2012, 04:25 AM
RJJP's Avatar
RJJP
RJJP is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Clare, MI
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having been under the hood of all but the newest body style (since the dent side), I have to say my dads 05 (F250 5.4) is the easiest to work on, my 97 (F150 4.6) was the hardest, for a while there the hard part was the cluster**** of BS that they put in for emissions, on my 92 (F250 7.3 IDI Turbo) it's the physical size of the motor that makes it a pain, but I'm not sold on the new crap yet, something about it just doesn't sit right with me (besides the fact that I find most of them butt ugly)...
But I do know for a fact that my fathers 05 F250 (5.4) cannot safely handle the loads that my 92 (or my old 93 F250 300 I6) can.
 
  #37  
Old 09-18-2012, 08:18 AM
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Head is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,867
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
But I do know for a fact that my fathers 05 F250 (5.4) cannot safely handle the loads that my 92 (or my old 93 F250 300 I6) can.
This is a joke right? I'm sorry, you may not like the styling of the Super Duty trucks, or how the engine feels, but they are better in every single possible way than an OBS. Twice the power of your 300, much heavier frame, axles and suspension.
 
  #38  
Old 09-18-2012, 08:45 AM
El Camino Man's Avatar
El Camino Man
El Camino Man is offline
Logistics Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad
Then go buy a FIAT if they are so great
I know, i know, theyre owned by Fiat lol. My point is, Ford needs to make a half ton cheap truck, then more people, including me, would be more apt to buy one.
 
  #39  
Old 09-18-2012, 09:10 AM
burnout400m's Avatar
burnout400m
burnout400m is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,179
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Lead Head
This is a joke right? I'm sorry, you may not like the styling of the Super Duty trucks, or how the engine feels, but they are better in every single possible way than an OBS. Twice the power of your 300, much heavier frame, axles and suspension.
As much as I like the old stuff, that's the truth. The 5.4 v8 and the and the 6.8(?)l v10 redline way higher than anything before.

Originally Posted by El Camino Man
I know, i know, theyre owned by Fiat lol. My point is, Ford needs to make a half ton cheap truck, then more people, including me, would be more apt to buy one.
That's what I'm sayin'. Maybe they could bring back the F100 with a stripped down base model. Cloth bench seat, manual windows, no headliner, rubber floors, and lose every single little thing that isn't essential like the system that tells you the tire pressure is low. Since most everyone has an MP3 player or a satellite radio thing they can plug into the aux input on the stereo why not have a head unit that is nothing more than an aux input with a volume ****? There's a bunch of base model trucks at my work and most don't have power windows or mirrors but they all have am/fm, cd, and satellite built in on a truck that's supposed to be as bare-bones as it gets.
 
  #40  
Old 09-18-2012, 09:31 AM
Spktyr's Avatar
Spktyr
Spktyr is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by burnout400m
As much as I like the old stuff, that's the truth. The 5.4 v8 and the and the 6.8(?)l v10 redline way higher than anything before.

With modern engines and transmissions, revving higher is not a big deal for a new gas truck. Not to mention that that 5.4 makes more torque *everywhere* than your truck.


Link if image does not work: http://jastrauss.fastmail.fm/1990_p16.jpg

Those were Ford at-the-crank numbers and graphs. Here's the as-measured wheel power for the new 5.0:


Link if image does not work: http://www.f150online.com/forums/mem...3-untitled.jpg

And the 2009 5.4L:


Link if pic does not work: http://www.f150online.com/forums/mem...perf-hp-tq.jpg

Add about 15% to those to get comparable at the crank numbers. Here's an at-the-crank graph for a late 5.4:

Link if pic does not work: http://www.gearvendors.com/images/f5.gif

To say nothing of what the Lightning (and the related early Raptor with the 5.4) got at the crank:

Link if pic does not work: https://www.ford-trucks.com/specs/lightning_torque.jpg
 
  #41  
Old 09-18-2012, 10:34 AM
ewalt98's Avatar
ewalt98
ewalt98 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bitterroots of Montana
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by El Camino Man
I know, i know, theyre owned by Fiat lol. My point is, Ford needs to make a half ton cheap truck, then more people, including me, would be more apt to buy one.
I agree with that, and have a one word response: "Ranger"!
 
  #42  
Old 09-18-2012, 11:19 AM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Diesel_Brad is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 21,431
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Tire pressure monitors have been STANDARD since 07ish. You can thank the federal government and all the a holes that roller their explorers.

As for making a stripped truck, they DO.

Ford's is $23,670.

Fiat's is $22,120

Government Motors is $22,595

They all have vinyl floors, vinyl seats, manual windows. AKA STRIPPED
 
  #43  
Old 09-18-2012, 12:15 PM
White 97 xlt's Avatar
White 97 xlt
White 97 xlt is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cleveland, TN
Posts: 4,728
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ewalt98
I agree with that, and have a one word response: "Ranger"!
Just one problem here,,, they quit making Rangers. "Change that to don't sell new Rangers in the USA" .... So it is not an option anymore if you are looking for a cheap "new" truck.
 
  #44  
Old 09-18-2012, 01:02 PM
rangergirl94's Avatar
rangergirl94
rangergirl94 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Geneva,Ohio
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Not to mention no manual trannys and the 300 i6 wont move a load fast! It wont move itself empty any faster this does not mean it is struggling!! It isnt
 
  #45  
Old 09-18-2012, 01:08 PM
ewalt98's Avatar
ewalt98
ewalt98 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bitterroots of Montana
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by White 97 xlt
Just one problem here,,, they quit making Rangers. "Change that to don't sell new Rangers in the USA" .... So it is not an option anymore if you are looking for a cheap "new" truck.
Yep, I was agreeing with El Camino Man that Ford needs to make a good cheap 1/2 ton. We had that option with the Ranger...
 


Quick Reply: Old Vs New



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.